Open Journal Systems

The Call of Simon Peter in Luke 5,1-11: A Lukan Invention?

Slawomir Szkredka

Abstrakt


Recent studies on the role of the eyewitnesses in the formation of the Gospel tradition argue for the singular importance of the original followers of Jesus. Luke himself might reflect their unique standing with his stated reliance on “the eyewitnesses and the servants of the word” (1,2). Still, Luke’s expansion of the Markan call of Peter seems, to many modern scholars at least, precisely that – a literary reworking of the original Markan story. Luke thus appears to resort to literary fiction to confirm the authority of those who guarantee the non-fictional character of his narrative. The conflicting nature of this operation needs to be reexamined. As this article argues, the recent studies on the Lake of Galilee, Simon Peter, and the role of the eyewitnesses offer enough evidence to suggest that in composing the story of the call of Peter, Luke relied on a source that depicted the call in connection with the fishing miracle. Secondly, existence of such a tradition opens new possibilities for reconstructing the past so differently narrativized by Luke and Mark.

Słowa kluczowe


New Testament; Gospel of Luke; Call of Simon Peter; Historical Peter; Luke’s Sources

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Abogunrin, S. O., “The Three Variant Accounts of Peter’s Call. A Critical and Theological Examination of the Texts” NTS 31 (1985) 587-602.

Adams, H., The Sinner in Luke (The Evangelical Theological Society Monograph Series; Eugene, OR: Pickwick 2008).

Arens, E., “El destinatario del evangelio de Lucas”, Revista Bíblica 60 (1998) 225-243.

Bailey, J. A., The Traditions Common to the Gospels of Luke and John (NT.S 7; Leiden: Brill 1963).

Bauckham, R. J., Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospel as Eyewitness Testimony (Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: Eerdmans 2006).

Bishop, E. F. F., “Jesus and the Lake”, CBQ 13/4 (1951) 398-414.

Bock, D. L., Luke (BECNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker 1994) I.

Bockmuehl, M., Simon Peter in Scripture and Memory (Grand Rapids, NI: Baker Academic 2012).

Bockmuehl, M., The Remembered Peter: In Ancient Reception and Modern Debate (WUNT 262; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010).

Bond, H. K. – Hurtado L. W., eds., Peter in Early Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2015).

Bovon, F., Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1–9:50 (tr. C. M. Thomas) (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press 2002).

Brown, R. E. –Donfried, K. P. – Reumann, J., eds., Peter in the New Testament: A Collaborative Assessment by Protestant and Roman Catholic Scholars (New York: Augsburg Publishing House 1973).

Brown, R. E., The Gospel According to John (XIII-XXI): Introduction, Translation, and Notes (AncB 29A; New York: Dou bleday 1970).

Busse, U., “Begegnung mit dem Wort nach Lk 5,1-11”, Luke and his readers: Festschrift A. Denaux (ed. R. Bieringer – G. van Belle – J. Verheyden) (Leuven: Peeters 2005).

Byrskog, S., “History or Story in Acts – A Middle Way? The ‘We’ Passages, Historical Intertexture, and Oral History”, Contextualizing Acts: Lukan Narrative and Greco-Roman Discourse (ed. T. Penner – C. Vander Stichele) (SBL Symposium Series 20; Atlanta: SBL 2003) 257-283.

Byrskog, S., Story as History. History as Story: The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History (WUNT II 123; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2000).

Delorme, J., “Luc 5,1-11: analyse structurale et histoire de la redaction”, NTS 18 (1972) 331-350.

Denaux, A. – Corstjens, R., The Vocabulary of Luke: An Alphabetical Presentation and a Survey of Characteristic and Noteworthy Words and Word Groups in Luke's Gospel (Leuven: Peeters 2009).

Dietrich, W., Das Petrusbild der Lukanischen Schriften (BWANT 94; Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer 1972).

Dunn, J. D. G., Jesus Remembered. Christianity in the Making (Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: Eerdmans 2003).

Eckey, W., Das Lukasevangelium unter Berücksichtigung seiner Parallelen. Teilband 1: Lk 1,1–10,42 (2. durchgesehene Auflage) (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Nuekirchener 2006).

Fitzmyer, J. A., The Gospel According to Luke I–IX. Introduction, Translation, and Notes (AncB 28; New York: Doubleday 1981).

Grethlein J. – Krebs, C. B., “The Historian’s Plupast: Introductory Remarks on Its Forms and Functions”, Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The ‘Plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian (ed. J. Grethlein and C. B. Krebs) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012) 1-16.

Hengel, M., Saint Peter: The Underestimated Apostle (tr. T. H. Trapp) (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2010).

Klein, H., Das Lukasevangelium (KEK; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2006).

Marshall, I. H., The Gospel of Luke. A Commentary on the Greek Text (NIGTC; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1978).

Mathieu, Y., La figure de Pierre dans l'oeuvre de Luc. (Évangile et Actes des Apôtres) une approche synchronique (Études bibliques. Nouvelle série, 052; Paris: Gabalda 2004).

Mciver, R. K., “Eyewitnesses as Guarantors of the Accuracy of the Gospel Traditions in the Light of Psychological Research”, JBL 131 (2012): 529-546.

Militsios, N., The Shaping of Narrative in Polybius (Berlin – Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2013).

Neale, D., None but the Sinners: Religious Categories in the Gospel of Luke (JSNT.S 58; Sheffield: Academic Press 1991).

Nolland, J. L., Luke 1–9:20 (WBC 35a; Dallas: Word Books 1989).

Notley, R. S., “The Sea of Galilee. Development of an Early Christian Toponym”, JBL 128/1 (2009) 183-188.

Ó Fearghail, F., The Introduction to Luke-Acts: A Study of the Role of Lk 1,1–4,44 in the Composition of Luke’s Two-Volume Work (AnBib 126; Rome 1991).

Perkins, P., “Peter: How a Flawed Disciple Became Jesus’ Successor on Earth,” Bible Review 20/1 2004: 12-23.

Perkins, P., Peter: Apostle for the Whole Church (Minneapolis: Fortress 2000).

Pesch, R., Der reiche Fischfang: Lk 5,1-11/Jo 21,1-14. Wundergeschichte – Berufungserzählung – Erscheinungsbericht (Kommentare und Beiträge zum Alten und Neuen Testament; Düsseldorf: Patmos 1969).

Pesonen, A., Luke, the Friend of Sinners (Diss. University of Helsinki; Helsinki

.

Plummer, A., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Luke (Edinburgh: T & T Clark 1896).

Radl, W., Das Evangelium nach Lukas. Kommentar. Erster Teil: 1,1–9,50 (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder 2003).

Redman, J., “How Accurate Are Eyewitnesses? Bauckham and the Eyewitnesses in the Light of Psychological Research”, JBL 129 (2010) 177-197.

Rossé, G., Il Vangelo di Luca. Commento esegetico e teologico (Collana scritturistica di Città Nuova; Roma: Città Nuova 1992).

Sabourin, L., L’Évangile de Luc. Introduction et commentaire (Roma: Pontificia Universitas Gregoriana 1985).

Schmidt, D. D., “Rhetorical Influences and Genre: Luke’s Preface”, Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke’s Narrative Claim upon Israel’s Legacy (ed. D. P. Moessner) (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International 1999) 27-60.

Schneider, G., Das Evangelium nach Lukas. Kapitel 1-10 (ÖTNT 3/1; Gütersloher – Würzburg: Gütersloher Verlagshaus 1977).

Scholz, D. J., Luke 5:1-11: The Call and Commission of Simon Peter (Diss. Marquette University; Milwaukee, WI 1997).

Schröter, J., “The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony? A Critical Examination of

Richard Bauckham’s Jesus and the Eyewitnesses” JSNT 31.2 (2008) 195-209.

Schürmann, H., Das Lukasevangelium. I. Kommentar zu Kap. 1,1–9,50 (HThKNT 3; Freiburg: Herder 1969).

Wiarda, T., Peter in the Gospels: Pattern, Personality, Relationship (WUNT II 123; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2000).

Wolter, M., Das Lukasevangelium (HNT 5; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2008).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


The Institute of Biblical Studies, Faculty of Theology, the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland