Open Journal Systems

"Plemię żmijowe" (Łk 3,7) i pokrewne wypowiedzi w Łk-Dz. Diagnoza sytuacji współczesnych Jezusowi czy kondycji człowieka?

Krzysztof Mielcarek

Abstrakt


The negative phrase: “the brood of vipers” has no equivalent in the OT, neither it is present in the extra-biblical writings. The first evangelist is the one who uses the epithet most often. However, Luke does use it as well (Lk 3:7). The paper is a study of narrative strategies of both Gospel-writers within the context of the OT and the rabbinic literature in order to identify one of the important narrative threads of the third Gospel. Instead of stigmatizing the particular faction of the Israel’s religious society, Luke employs the primordial Christian tradition to stress sinfulness of human nature, which in the past resulted in rejecting the good news of Jesus.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/ba.2018.8.2.03


Słowa kluczowe


brood of vipers, generation, viper and snake in BH, LXX and NT, sinfulness, Luke’s theology

Pełny tekst:

PDF

Bibliografia


Bauer W., Danker F.W., Arndt W., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. (Chicago: University Press 2000)

Boice J.M., The Gospel of Matthew (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books 2001).

Bovon F., H. Koester, Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:19:50, (Hermeneia – a Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2002).

Büchsel F., γενεά, TDNT, vol. 1, 662-663.

Carmignac J., Les elements historiques des ‘Hymnes’ de Qumran, RevQ 2 9(1960) 205-222.

Charlesworth J.H., John the Baptizer and the Dead Sea Scrolls, The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The second Princeton Symposium on Judaism and Christian Origins. Volume three (red. J.H. Charlesworth) (Waco, Tx: Baylor University Press 2006)

Charlesworth J.H., The Good and Evil Serpent: How a Universal Symbol Became Christianized (Yale: University Press 2010).

Charlesworth J.H., Was John the Baptist a Member of the Qumran Community? Once More, Christian Origins and Hellenistic Judaism (red. S.E. Porter, A. Pitts; E-Books Online Collection: Brill 2013) 281-313, Chapter DOI: 10.1163/9789004236394_012 E-ISBN: 9789004236394.

Danker F.W., Jesus and the New Age According to St. Luke: A Commentary on the Third Gospel (St. Louis: Clayton Publishing House 1972).

Davies W.D., Allison D.C., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew (London–New York: T&T Clark International 2004)

Delcor M., Les hymnes de Qumran (Hodayot): Texte hébreu, introduction, traduction, commentaire (Paris: Letouzey et Ane 1962).

Ellis E.E., The Gospel of Luke (London: Nelson 1966; 2d ed.; London: Oliphants 1974).

Fitzmyer J.A., The Gospel according to Luke I-IX: Introduction, Translation, and Notes (AYB 28A) (New Haven; London: Yale University Press 2008).

Garcı́a Martı́nez F., Tigchelaar E., The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition (Translations) (Leiden–New York: Brill 1997-1998).

Hagner D.A., Matthew 1-13 (WBC 33A; Dallas: Word Incorporated 2002).

Joüon P., Muraoka T., A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew, (SB 27) (Rome: Editrice PIB 2006).

Keener C.S., ‘Brood of Vipers’ (Matthew 3.7; 12.34; 23.33), Journal for the Study of the New Testament 2SA (2005) 3-11 (DOI: 10.1177/0142064X05057771).

Kidder, S.J., 'This generation' in Matthew 24:34, Andrews University Seminary Studies 21/3 (1983) 203-209.

Knowles M.P., Serpents, scribes, and Pharisees, Journal of Biblical Literature 133/1 (2014) 165-178.

Koehler L., Baumgartner W., Richardson M.E.J., Stamm J.J., The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (electronic ed. Leiden–New York: Brill 1999 c1994-1996).

Liddell H.G., Scott R., Jones H.S., McKenzie R., A Greek-English Lexicon (Oxford–New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press 1996).

Lövestam E., Jesus and ‘This Generation’: A New Testament Study (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1995).

Marshall I.H., The Gospel of Luke: A Com¬men¬tary on the Greek Text (Exeter: Paternoster Press 1978).

Mędala S., List do arcykapłana z Qumran (4QMMT) a „jad żmijowy” faryzeuszów, Collectanea Theologica 64/3 (1994) 47-72.

Mickiewicz F., Ewangelia według świętego Łukasza, rozdziały 1–11. Wstęp, przekład z oryginału, komentarz (Nowy Komentarz Biblijny III/1) (Częstochowa: Edycja św. Pawła 2011).

Mielcarek K., Jezus – Ewangelizator ubogich (Warszawa: AND 1994).

Milik J.T., 4Q Visions de ‘Amram et un citation d’Origene, RB 79 (1972) 81-82.

Moessner, D.P. The 'Leaven of the Pharisees' and 'this generation': Israel's rejection of Jesus according to Luke, Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 34(1988) 21-46.

Muchowski P., Rękopisy znad Morza Martwego. Qumran, Wadi Murabba‘at i Nachal Chewer (Kraków: Enigma Press 2000).

Nelson N.D., 'This Generation' in Matt 24:34: A Literary Critical Perspective, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 38/3(1995) 369-385.

Nolland J., The Gospel of Matthew: A Commentary on the Greek Text (Grand Rapids, MI; Carlisle: Eerdmans; Paternoster Press 2005).

Paciorek A., Ewangelia według świętego Mateusza. Rozdziały 1–11 (Nowy Komentarz Biblijny NT 1/1; Częstochowa: Edycja św. Pawła 2005)

Rakocy W., Obraz i funkcja faryzeuszy w dziele. Łukaszowym (Łk-Dz): studium literacko-teologiczne (Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL 2000).

Schürmann H., Das Lukasevangelium: Erster Teil: Kommentar zu Kap. 1, 1-9, 50 (HTKNT 3/1; Freiburg: Herder, 1969).

Simonetti M., Matthew 14-28 (Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. New Testa-ment 1b) (Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press 2002).

Tannehill R.C., The Sword of His Mouth (Philadelphia/Missoula, MT: Fortress/Scholars 1975).

Wise M.O., Abegg, jr. M.G., Cook E.M., The Dead Sea Scrolls. A New English Translation (San Francisco, Ca: Harper Collins 1996, 2005, electronic edition).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


The Institute of Biblical Studies, Faculty of Theology, the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland

 


 

Licencja Creative Commons
Teksty w czasopiśmie są dostępne na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska.