Open Journal Systems

The specificity of linguistic anthropology in the thought of Alessandro

Nwauzor Lambert Uwaoma

Abstrakt


The major task of this paper is to present and discuss the specificity of linguistic anthropology in the thought of Alessandro Duranti. This discussion takes effect within the range of what Duranti calls the scope and theoretical concern in contemporary linguistic anthropology. In this discussion however, he presents a new interpretation and definition of human being in the perspective of linguistic anthropology. Thus, man is defined by the functionality of his language, as actualizing his social nature.
This work intends to present firstly, the scope of linguistic anthropology which would encompass definition, methods, object and purpose. This would be followed by a consideration of the main concepts that form the major areas of theoretical concern in Duranti’s contemporary linguistic anthropology namely: performance, indexicality and participation. In the concluding section, an attempt to examine Duranti’s project, especially in the light of the method of realistic metaphysics cultivated by the Lublin Philosophical School will be made.


Słowa kluczowe


Language, Anthropology, Man, Society, Culture

Pełny tekst:

PDF

Bibliografia


Bibliography proper to the article: The Specificity of Linguistic Anthropology in the thought of Alssandro Duranti

Armour-Thomas, E. & Goupaul-Nicol, S. (1998). Assessing Intelligence. Applying a Bio-cultural Model. USA: Sage Publications.

Austin, J.L. (1961). Philosophical Papers. London: Oxford University Press.

Bezuidenhout, A. (2006). ‘‘Language as Internal,’’ in Lepore and Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press .

Carnap, R. (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. Chicago.

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. West Port, CT: Praeger.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Programme ( Current Studies in Linguistics 28).Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Chomsky, N. (2000). The Architecture of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davis, J. (1994). Mother Tongue: How Humans Create Language. New York: Carol Pub. Group .

Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Gilson, E. (1988). Linguistics and Philosophy. An Essay on the Philosophical Constants of Language, Trans. John Lyon, U.S.A: University of Notre Dame Press.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York and Evanston: Harper and Row Publishers.

Hymes, D. (1963). Objectives and Concepts of Linguistic Anthropology, in D.G. Mandelbaum, G.W. Lasker and E.M. Albert (eds.), The Teaching of Anthropology. American Anthropological Association, Memoir 94.

Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: Dutton.

Malinowski, B. (1923). ‘‘The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages,’’ in C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards (eds.), The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt, Brace & world Inc.

Morrison, T. (1994). The Noble Lecture in Literature, 1993. New York: Knopf.

Peirce, C. (1940). Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs. In J.Buchler (ed.), Philosophical Writings of Peirce: Selected Writings. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Quine, W. (1981). Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yang, C. (2006). The Infinite Gift: How Children Learn and Unlearn the Languages of the World. New York: Scribner.

Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Redakcja Zeszytów Naukowych KUL, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

Teksty w czasopiśmie są dostępne na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Numery czasopisma sprzed roku 2017 w wersji PDF są do pobrania  > tutaj.