The specificity of linguistic anthropology in the thought of Alessandro


The major task of this paper is to present and discuss the specificity of linguistic anthropology in the thought of Alessandro Duranti. This discussion takes effect within the range of what Duranti calls the scope and theoretical concern in contemporary linguistic anthropology. In this discussion however, he presents a new interpretation and definition of human being in the perspective of linguistic anthropology. Thus, man is defined by the functionality of his language, as actualizing his social nature.
This work intends to present firstly, the scope of linguistic anthropology which would encompass definition, methods, object and purpose. This would be followed by a consideration of the main concepts that form the major areas of theoretical concern in Duranti’s contemporary linguistic anthropology namely: performance, indexicality and participation. In the concluding section, an attempt to examine Duranti’s project, especially in the light of the method of realistic metaphysics cultivated by the Lublin Philosophical School will be made.

Słowa kluczowe

Language; Anthropology; Man; Society; Culture

Bibliography proper to the article: The Specificity of Linguistic Anthropology in the thought of Alssandro Duranti [Google Scholar]
Armour-Thomas, E. & Goupaul-Nicol, S. (1998). Assessing Intelligence. Applying a Bio-cultural Model. USA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
Austin, J.L. (1961). Philosophical Papers. London: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Bezuidenhout, A. (2006). ‘‘Language as Internal,’’ in Lepore and Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press . [Google Scholar]
Carnap, R. (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. Chicago. [Google Scholar]
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. West Port, CT: Praeger. [Google Scholar]
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Programme ( Current Studies in Linguistics 28).Cambridge, MA: MIT press. [Google Scholar]
Chomsky, N. (2000). The Architecture of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Davis, J. (1994). Mother Tongue: How Humans Create Language. New York: Carol Pub. Group . [Google Scholar]

Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology, New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman. [Google Scholar]
Gilson, E. (1988). Linguistics and Philosophy. An Essay on the Philosophical Constants of Language, Trans. John Lyon, U.S.A: University of Notre Dame Press. [Google Scholar]
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York and Evanston: Harper and Row Publishers. [Google Scholar]
Hymes, D. (1963). Objectives and Concepts of Linguistic Anthropology, in D.G. Mandelbaum, G.W. Lasker and E.M. Albert (eds.), The Teaching of Anthropology. American Anthropological Association, Memoir 94. [Google Scholar]
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: Dutton. [Google Scholar]
Malinowski, B. (1923). ‘‘The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages,’’ in C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards (eds.), The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt, Brace & world Inc. [Google Scholar]
Morrison, T. (1994). The Noble Lecture in Literature, 1993. New York: Knopf. [Google Scholar]
Peirce, C. (1940). Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs. In J.Buchler (ed.), Philosophical Writings of Peirce: Selected Writings. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [Google Scholar]
Quine, W. (1981). Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Yang, C. (2006). The Infinite Gift: How Children Learn and Unlearn the Languages of the World. New York: Scribner. [Google Scholar]
Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]




Uwaoma, N. (2018). The specificity of linguistic anthropology in the thought of Alessandro. Zeszyty Naukowe KUL, 61(3), 169-187.

Nwauzor Lambert Uwaoma

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.

Przesyłając artykuł do publikacji, autor oświadcza, że posiada pełnię autorskich praw majątkowych oraz osobistych do utworu, a jego opublikowanie nie naruszy praw osób trzecich.

Przesłanie przez autora artykułu do publikacji w czasopiśmie „Zeszyty Naukowe KUL”  traktowane będzie jako udzielenie licencji do eksploatacji praw autorskich do przesłanego utworu na zasadach licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)