Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 35 No. 38 (2025)

Articles

Workaholism as a Cause of Consensual Incapacity to Marry in the Jurisprudence of the Roman Rota. Procedural implications

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32077/bskp.9446  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-05-26

Abstract

In the presented article, the issue of the influence of workaholism on the consensual incapacity to marry in the jurisprudence of the Roman Rota became the subject of attention. The Author’s analysis of the rotal judgments showed that in the vast majority of them, with the exception of one, the validity of the marriage was judged. However, the Author did not stop at this conclusion, but posed an important question: whether such a state of jurisprudence would prove that workaholism cannot be considered a cause of consensual incapacity. He answered this question in the negative, maintaining that rotational sentencing was mainly determined by the conditions of the cases. He also observed that there were explicit references to the canonical category of mental anomaly in the sentences examined. In favour of the thesis that workaholism could be a cause of psychological nature, he supported it with the results of research in psychology and medicine. He took the view that workaholism could prevent the undertaking of essential marital duties in the areas of spousal well-being and the well-being of offspring.

References

  1. Bayhan Karapinar, Pinar, Selin Metin Camgöz, Ozge Tayfur Ekmekci, i in. 2020. „Employee Wellbeing, Workaholism, Work–Family Conflict and Instrumental Spousal Support: A Moderated Mediation Model.” Journal of Happiness Studies 21:2451-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00191-x [Google Scholar]
  2. Dudek, Bohdan, Mateusz Hauk, i Dorota Merecz. 2011. „Ocena pracoholizmu jako behawioralnej tendencji – polska adaptacja kwestionariusza Mudracka i Naughtona.” Medycyna Pracy 62, nr 2:127-32. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dudek, Bohdan. 2008. „Pracoholizm – szkodliwy skutek nadmiernego zaangażowania w pracę.” Medycyna Pracy 59, nr 2:247-54. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dzierżon, Ginter. 2011. „Recepcja osiągnięć psychologii u psychiatrii w prawie małżeńskim.” Prawo Kanoniczne 54, nr 1-2:175-90. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fassel, Diane. 1990. Working Ourselves to Death: The High Costs of Workaholism, the Rewards of Recovery. San Francisco: Harper Collins. [Google Scholar]
  6. García Faílde, Juan J. 1990. Trastornos psíchicos y nulidad del matrimonio. Salamanca: Publicationes Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca. [Google Scholar]
  7. Golińska, Lucyna. 2010. „Pracoholizm – istota, konsekwencje i uwarunkowania.” Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia psychologica 14:97-107. [Google Scholar]
  8. Górski, Krzysztof. 2006. Das Personenbezogene Eheverständnis und Relatives Erfüllungsvermögen. Franfurt am Mein: Peter Lang Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hauk, Mateusz, i Jan Chodkiewicz. 2013. „The Role of General and Occupational Stress in the Relationship between Workaholism and Work-Family/Family-Work Conflicts.” International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 26, nr 3:383-93. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kamiński, Rafał. 2024. Narcyzm wrażliwy i jego wpływ na zdolność do zawarcia małżeństwa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego. [Google Scholar]
  11. Malinowska, Diana. 2014. Pracoholizm, zjawisko wielowymiarowe. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagielońskiego. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mierzejewski, Krzysztof. 2011. „Pracoholizm jako przyczyna niezdolności do zawarcia małżeństwa.” Ius Matrimoniale 16(22):27-57. [Google Scholar]
  13. Oates, Wayne. 1972. Confessions of a Workaholic. New York: World. [Google Scholar]
  14. Paździor, Stanisław. 1999. Przyczyny psychiczne niezdolności osoby do zawarcia małżeństwa w świetle kan. 1095. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne w Sandomierzu. [Google Scholar]
  15. Paździor, Stanisław. 2004. Przyczyny poważnego braku rozeznania oceniającego w świetle kan. 1095 n. 2. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Polihymnia. [Google Scholar]
  16. Robinson, Bryan. 2001. „Workaholism and Family Functioning: a Profile of Familial Relationships, Psychological Uutcomes, and Research Considerations.” Contemporary Family Therapy 23, nr 1:123-35. [Google Scholar]
  17. Robinson, Bryan. 2002. „Workaholism: Bridging the Gap Between Workplace, Sociocultural, and Family Research.” Journal of Employment Counseling 37, nr 3:37-41. [Google Scholar]
  18. Schultz, Anna. 2017. „Pracoholizm znamieniem współczesności?” Nauki Ekonomiczne 26:417-34. [Google Scholar]
  19. Torp, Steffen, Linda Lysfjord, i Hovda H. Midje. 2018. „Workaholism and Work – Family conflict among University Academics.” Higher Education 76:1071-1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0247-0 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.