Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Kanonistów Polskich

Vol. 33 No. 36 (2023)

Articles

The Construction of Canon 15 § 2 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law and its Implications

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32077/bskp.5331  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-05-31

Abstract

In the presented article, the Author undertook an analysis of Canon 15 § 2 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law from the point of view of its construction and its ratio legis. He showed that the principles included in the first part of the sentence of the regulation have the character of general rules. In his opinion, the adoption of such a solution results from the fact that the premises included in the provision refer to the prescriptive or prohibitory laws, which, in the aspect of nullity of the act, are of a less radical character than the invalidating or disqualifying laws (Canon 10), to which the legislator referred in Canon 15 § 1. Moreover, he proved by analysing the regulations outside the first book of the Code of Canon Law as well as the doctrinal heritage that, in relation to the area defined in Canon 15 § 2, in the canonical legal order there still exist prior principles resulting from the systemic assumptions and the general theory of a legal act resulting in the fact that, in certain circumstances, the general rules are not valid.

According to the Author, the introduction of the presumption iuris tantum in the second part of the sentence of Canon 15 § 2 was due to the fact that a non-notorious fact of another is not characterised by such obviousness as one’s own or another’s notorious fact.

References

  1. Aymans, Winfried, i Klaus Mörsdorf. 1991. Kanonisches Recht. T. 1. Paderborn–München–Wien–Zürich: Schöningh Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlingò, Salvatore. 2015. Nel silenzio del diritto. Risonanze canonistiche. Bologna: Mulino. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bunge, Alejandro. 2006. Las claves del Código. El libro I del Código de Derecho Canonico. Buenos Aires: San Benito. [Google Scholar]
  4. Calabrese, Antonio. 2006. Diritto penale canonico. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiappetta, Luigi. 1996. ll Codice di Diritto Canonico. Commento giuridico-pastorale. T. 1. Roma: Edizioni Dehoniane. [Google Scholar]
  6. De Paolis, Valesio, i Andrea D’Auria. 2008. Le norme generali di Diritto Canonico. Commento al Codice di Diritto Canonico. Roma: Urbaniana Univerisity Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dzierżon, Ginter. 2010. „Ignorancja i błąd a skuteczność ustaw unieważniających oraz uniezdalniających w kanonicznym porządku prawnym (kan. 15 § 1 KPK).” W W kręgu nowożytnej i najnowszej historii ustroju Polski. Księga dedykowana Profesorowi Marianowi Kallasowi, red. Sławomir Godek, Dariusz Makiłła, i Magdalena Wilczek-Karczewska, 743-40. Warszawa: InterLeones Halina Dyczkowska sp.j. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dzierżon, Ginter. 2021. „Interpretacja ustawy zgodnie z kan. 18 KPK.” Studia Redemptorystowskie 19:295-307. http://dx.medra.org/10.48290/sr2021.18 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gałkowski, Tomasz. 2020. Ogólne zasady prawa w prawie kanonicznym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego. [Google Scholar]
  10. van Hove, Adolf. 1928. Commentarium Lovaniense in Codicem Iuris Canonici. Cz. 1. T. 2: Prolegomena. Mechliniae–Romae: Summi Pontificis, SS. Congregationum Rituum et de Propaganda Fide nenon Archiep. Mechl. Typographus. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jimenez Urresti, Teodoro I. 1985. „Comento al can. 15 CIC.” W Código de Derecho Canónico. Edición bilingüe comentada, red. Lamberto De Echeveria, 26. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristanos. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jone, Heribertus. 1950. Commentarium in Codicem Iuris Canonici. T. 1. Paderborn: Officina Libraria Ferdinand Schöningh. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kroczek, Piotr. 2011. The Art of Legislation: the Principles of Lawgiving in the Church. Kraków: Unum Publishing House. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lombardía, Pedro. 2018. „Comento al can. 15 CIC.” W Código de Derecho Canónico. Edición bilingüe y anotada, 97-98. Pamplona: EUNSA. [Google Scholar]
  15. Michiels, Gommarus. 1929. Normae generales juris canonici. T. 1. Lublin: Universitas Catholica. [Google Scholar]
  16. Otaduy, Javier. 1996. „Comento al can. 15 CIC.” W Comentario exegético al Código de Derecho Canónico. T. 1, red. Angel Marzoa, Jorge Miras, i Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña, 347-50. Pamplona: EUNSA. [Google Scholar]
  17. Regatillo, Eduardo. 1961. Institutiones iuris canonici. T. 1. Santander: Editorial «Sal Terrae». [Google Scholar]
  18. Reiffenstuel, Anaclet. 1870. Ius canonicum universum. T. 7. Parisiis: Apud Ludovicum Vivés. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sánchez-Gil, Antonio S. 2006. La presunzione di validità dell’atto giuridico nel diritto canonico. Milano: Giuffrè Editore. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sánchez-Gil, Antonio S. 2012. „Presunción.” W Diccionario general de Derecho canónico. T. 7, red. Javier Otaduy, Antonio Viana, i Joaquín Sedano, 424-33. Pamplona: Aranzadi. [Google Scholar]
  21. Socha, Heribert. 1983. „Allgemeine Normen.” W Münsterischer Kommentar zum Codex Iuris Canonici. T. 1, red. Klaus Lüdicke, ad 15. Essen: Ludgerus Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  22. Syryjczyk, Jerzy. 2008. Sankcje w Kościele. Część ogólna komentarz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.