The author undertook an unusual issue to discuss, namely the scope of criminal liability of an intermediary who invokes influence towards a party concerned and who turns out to be affected by insanity. Based on the scant number of publications and rulings, which usually refer only to a limited extent to the subject under study, an attempt is made to summarise the few and ambiguous positions presented there. On this basis, as well of as on the basis of own experience, the author presents conclusions indicating the non-obvious criminal-law situation of a person accused of such an act.
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.