Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Kanonistów Polskich

Vol. 35 No. 38 (2025)

Articles

The Influence of the Reverential Fear to the Marriage Invalidity. The Gloss on the Sentence of the Roman Rota of the Calissien Case of 13 October 2016 coram Vito A. Todisco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32077/bskp.9395  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-05-26

Abstract

The article contains three parts. The first part reveals the factual course of the Callisien case, which is the subject of the sentence of the Roman Rota coram Vito A. Todisco of 13 October 2016 declaring the nullity of a marriage on the grounds of reverential fear. The second part explains the grounds for the nullity of a marriage on the grounds of force and fear in the light of the provisions of Canon 1103 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the basic legal concepts of force, common fear and reverential fear in the light of the doctrine and jurisprudence of the Roman Rota. The third part analyses the essential elements of the justification of the Rota of Rome sentence mentioned in the title, in particular: the plaintiff’s credibility and her aversion to the defendant.

References

  1. Beal, John P. 2000. „Reverential Fear.” W New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law, red. John P. Beal, James A. Coriden, i Thomas J. Green, 1321-322. New York–Mahwah: Paulist Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eichmann, Eduard, i Klaus Mörsdorf. 1953. Lehrbuch des Kirchenrechts. Vol. II. Paderborn: Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  3. Góralski, Wojciech. 2011. „Zgoda małżeńska.” W Komentarz do Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego, t. III/2: Księga IV, Uświęcające zadanie Kościoła, red. Józef Krukowski, 294-310. Poznań: Pallottinum. [Google Scholar]
  4. Krukowski, Józef. 1968. Wpływ bojaźni z szacunku na wartość umowy małżeńskiej (Studium historyczno-prawne). Lublin: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski. [Google Scholar]
  5. Maroto, Filippo. 1919. Institutiones Iuris Canonici. Vol. I. Matriti: Commentarium pro religiosis. [Google Scholar]
  6. Michiels, Gommarus. 1949. Normae generales iuris canonici. Parisiis–Tomaci–Romae: Typ. Soc. S. Joannis Evangelistae Desclée et Socii. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mörsdorf, Klaus. 1962. „Die Autorität der rotalen Rechtsprechung.” Archiv für Katholisches Kirchenrecht 11:515-32. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pontius, Basilius. 1640. De sacramento matrimonii tractatus. Lugduni: apud F. Vivienum. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sánchez, Tomás. 1672. De matrimonii sacramento. Venetiis: apud Nicolaum Pezzana. [Google Scholar]
  10. Viladrich, Pedro J. 2011. „Komentarz do kan. 1103.” W Codex Iuris Canonici. Kodeks Prawa Kanonicznego. Komentarz. Powszechne i partykularne ustawodawstwo Kościoła katolickiego. Podstawowe akty polskiego prawa wyznaniowego. Edycja polska na podstawie wydania hiszpańskiego, red. Piotr Majer, 827-830. Kraków: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.