
The article is devoted to critical analysis of the opinion according to which there are no legal obstacles for an attorney (or legal counsel) acting as a guardian (currently a representative of the child) appointed under Articles 99 and n. of the Family and Guardianship Code to appoint a legal representative in civil cases. Arguments based on child’s wellbeing were taken into account. Legal position of the child’s representative (including his duties and powers) was assessed taking into consideration child’s wellbeing. It was determined that legal position of the child’s representative differs from the position of traditional guardian. Legal requirements for an apointment of the child’s representative and the actions performed by such a representative were also presented.
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.