Rządowy projekt zmian procedury karnej z 28.10.2024 r. – kilka uwag praktycznych

Robert Rynkun-Werner

doi:10.54383/0031-0344.2025.09.3

No. 9 (2025)

Artykuły

Government’s bill of 28 October 2024 to amend the criminal procedure – some practical comments

Robert Rynkun-Werner

PDF (Język Polski)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54383/0031-0344.2025.09.3 [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-09-30

Abstract

On 28 October 2024 a bill to amend the Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure and certain other statutes was added to the government’s list of legislative works as form No. UD 153.This study presents what the author considers the most important proposals for changes in the provisions on criminal procedure and their subjective assessment from the point of view of the procedural guarantees of the accused. The bill is at the initial stage of the legislative procedure, so it is not yet known what its fate will be and when it will finally reach the Speaker. Nevertheless, due to the importance of the amendment in question, it seems necessary to start a broad discussion about the major changes the bill entails, from the point of view of citizens and that of the provisions governing the profession of defence lawyer in criminal cases.

References

Bernatt Maciej, Bodnar Adam, Stosowanie tymczasowego aresztowania w Polsce – problem strukturalny – wyrok ETPCz z 3.02.2009 r. Kauczor v. Polsce, EPS 2010/6 [Google Scholar]
Posnow Włodzimierz, uwagi do art. 79 (w:) Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, red. J. Skorupka, Warszawa 2020 [Google Scholar]
Rynkun-Werner Robert, Glosa do uchwały składu siedmiu sędziów Sądu Najwyższego – Izba Karna z 19 stycznia 2012 r., I KZP 18/11, „Palestra” 2013/11–12 [Google Scholar]
Skorupka Jerzy, Tymczasowe aresztowanie w praktyce stosowania prawa, „Palestra” 2021/1–2 [Google Scholar]
Skowron Agnieszka, Funkcje tymczasowego aresztowania w kontekście uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 19 stycznia 2012 r. (IKZP 18/11) oraz najnowszych zmian Kodeksu postępowania karnego, „Palestra” 2017/7–8 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords

amendment
procedural guarantees
criminal procedure
right to defence

How to Cite

Rynkun-Werner , R. (2025). Government’s bill of 28 October 2024 to amend the criminal procedure – some practical comments. Palestra, (9), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.54383/0031-0344.2025.09.3

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Robert Rynkun-Werner, Operational control without control – some reflections on the canvas to the decision of the Constitutional tribunal of 28 of Jule 2022 in the case SK 60/21 , Palestra: No. 4 (2023)
Robert Rynkun-Werner, Poles on the Ukrainian front, or the unresolved problem of abolition , Palestra: No. 2 (2025)

Similar Articles

Artur Kowalczyk, Appointment of a litigation attorney or defence counsel for a suspect for the purpose of examination of a vulnerable witness. Critical remarks against the background of Supreme Court’s jurisprudence , Palestra: No. 10 (2025)
Patrycja Balcer-Czarnecka , Translation or interpretation assistance for the accused and the possibility of verifying findings of fact made in connection with the translator’s or interpreter's activities in criminal proceedings , Palestra: No. 10 (2025)
Andrzej Malicki, Przemysław Krawczyk , Key issues in the lustration procedure. Do we need to change the statute or the practice of its application? , Palestra: No. 1 (2024)
Adriana Gostępska, Securing the claim in challenge proceedings against a decision of the National Appeals Chamber , Palestra: No. 7 (2025)
Tomasz Jankowiak, Limits of defence against psychological violence under the institution of necessary defence , Palestra: No. 10 (2023)
Marek Antoni Nowicki , European Court of Human Rights – review of case law (October-December 2023) , Palestra: No. 2 (2024)
Piotr Dobrowolski, The right to a social grant in the contect of waiting to repeat a semester. An approving commentary on judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Gorzów Wielkopolski of 2 August 2023 (II SA/Go 222/23) , Palestra: No. 2 (2024)
Marek Antoni Nowicki, Review of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (July-September 2023) , Palestra: No. 10 (2023)
Patrycja Balcer, Janusz Raglewski, Dobrosława Szumiło-Kulczycka, Review of the case law of the Polish Supreme Court in the area of criminal law (July–December 2021) , Palestra: No. 3 (2022)
Marek Antoni Nowicki, Review of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (January–March 2022) , Palestra: No. 4 (2022)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

[1] Bernatt Maciej, Bodnar Adam, Stosowanie tymczasowego aresztowania w Polsce – problem strukturalny – wyrok ETPCz z 3.02.2009 r. Kauczor v. Polsce, EPS 2010/6 [Google Scholar]

[2] Posnow Włodzimierz, uwagi do art. 79 (w:) Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, red. J. Skorupka, Warszawa 2020 [Google Scholar]

[3] Rynkun-Werner Robert, Glosa do uchwały składu siedmiu sędziów Sądu Najwyższego – Izba Karna z 19 stycznia 2012 r., I KZP 18/11, „Palestra” 2013/11–12 [Google Scholar]

[4] Skorupka Jerzy, Tymczasowe aresztowanie w praktyce stosowania prawa, „Palestra” 2021/1–2 [Google Scholar]

[5] Skowron Agnieszka, Funkcje tymczasowego aresztowania w kontekście uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 19 stycznia 2012 r. (IKZP 18/11) oraz najnowszych zmian Kodeksu postępowania karnego, „Palestra” 2017/7–8 [Google Scholar]