The commented Supreme Court judgment of 31 May 2023, II CSKP 281/22, addresses, among other things, the issue of the form of confirmation of a juridical act performed by an unauthorised agent (falsus procurator). The judgment assumes that no provision of the Civil Code requires a specific form for this act, so a declaration of intent confirming a so-called limping transaction may be made in any form. Furthermore, it states - which is unacceptable in the commentator's opinion - that in principle this is the case, an exception to which principle may result from Article 99(1) of the Civil Code.
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.