Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

No. 4 (2022)

Artykuły

Animal Rights Ombudsman: urgent need or redundant invention of the legislator?

  • Aleksandra Hurkała
Published: 2024-02-04

Abstract

The aim of the article is to make an assessment whether it is justified to establish a new authority: Animal Rights Ombudsman. It presents the legal instruments in the field of animal protection adopted so far and information about the activities of the authorities. The choice of the proposed name and the purposefulness of granting the Ombudsman immunity are analysed. The proposed powers of the Ombudsman are compared to the powers of other ombudsmen. The methods of linguistic-logical and argumentative analysis are used. Materials from the legislative process are used in the article. The analysis of the presented issue shows that the proposal is redundant and has certain flaws.

References

  1. Białocerkiewicz Jan, Status prawny zwierząt. Prawa zwierząt czy ochrona prawna zwierząt, Toruń 2005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Kuszlewicz Karolina, Ustawa o ochronie zwierząt. Komentarz, Warszawa 2021, LEX/el. [Google Scholar]
  3. Łętowska Ewa, Dwa cywilnoprawne aspekty praw zwierząt: dereifikacja i personifikacja (w:) Studia z prawa prywatnego. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesor Biruty Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowskiej, red. A. Szpunar, W.J. Katner, T. Pajor, M. Pyziak-Szafnicka, U. Promińska, E. Wojnicka, Łódź 1997 [Google Scholar]
  4. Probucka Dorota, Prawa zwierząt, Kraków 2015 [Google Scholar]
  5. Signerski Remigiusz, Immunitet sędziego, Warszawa 2016, LEX/el. [Google Scholar]
  6. Trociuk Stanisław, Ustawa o Rzeczniku Praw Obywatelskich. Komentarz, Warszawa 2020, LEX/el. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.