Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

No. 12 (2022)

Artykuły

Critital remarks about the regulation of § 36 of the Rules of Advocate’s Ethics

  • Mateusz Kisiela
Published: 2024-02-05

Abstract

The provision expressed in § 36 of the Bar Association Ethics and Dignity of the Profession Code, which requires attorneys to have any misunderstandings between them resolved first by the competent Bar authorities and then by a permanent arbitration court at the Supreme Bar Council or an arbitration court with the exclusive participation of attorneys, and imposes an obligation to introduce an arbitration clause in contracts of companies with the participation of attorneys, was introduced into the Bar Association Ethics and Dignity of the Profession Code in its current wording already 11 years ago – 19 pf November 2011, it nevertheless continues to stir controversy among commentators. The provision has met with numerous criticisms, which so far have not been taken into account by the bar’s resolution bodies and have not led to a possible change in the wording of the provision.

This article focuses around several criticisms of the provision in question, which may provide an impetus for the bar’s bodies to amend the provision in question and take into account the de lege ferenda proposals postulated in the doctrine.

References

  1. Budnik-Rogala Aleksandra (w:) Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, red. E. Marszałkowska-Krześ, Warszawa 2021 [Google Scholar]
  2. Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, t. 2, Komentarz do art. 2051–42412, red. A. Mar- [Google Scholar]
  3. ciniak, Warszawa 2019 [Google Scholar]
  4. Król Małgorzata, Etyka adwokacka i radcowska, Komentarz, orzecznictwo, kazusy i opinie, Warszawa 2017 [Google Scholar]
  5. Naumann Jerzy, Zbiór Zasad Etyki Adwokackiej i Godności Zawodu. Komentarz, Warszawa 2020 [Google Scholar]
  6. Orzeł-Jakubowska Aleksandra (w:) Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, red. P. Rylski, Warszawa 2022 [Google Scholar]
  7. Pietraszewski Mateusz, Zapis na sąd polubowny w umowach spółek z udziałem adwokatów (w:) Kodeks spółek handlowych. Po dziesięciu latach, [Google Scholar]
  8. red. J. Frąckowiak, Wrocław 2013 [Google Scholar]
  9. Suliński Grzegorz, Dopuszczalność poddania sporu ze stosunku spółki pod rozstrzygnięcie sądu polubownego, „Przegląd Prawa Handlowego” 2005/12, s. 29 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.