Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

No. 4 (2025)

Artykuły

The authorities' attitude towards the self-government of advocates in 1983–1985

  • Kamil Niewiński
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54383/0031-0344.2025.04.4  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-04-28

Abstract

The article is a continuation of the publication that appeared in “Palestra” (No. 3/2022). It concerned the path to the adoption of the Act - the Law on the Bar of 26 May 1982. This publication deals with the first three years of the functioning of the profession's self-government on the basis of the new provisions. This period witnessed events important for the Bar: elections to the new self-governing authorities and the first Bar convention since 1959. It is relevant to present the attitude of the authorities of the Polish People's Republic towards advocates. The authorities partially yielded to the demands of the Bar in 1982. However, they did not intend to give up their control over the Bar. The ideas carried by the so-called “Solidarity Carnival” (1980-1981) were still alive in the community. For this reason, the period from 1983 to 1985 brought increased supervision by the authorities over the actions of advocates as a professional group. They tried to influence the results of elections to the self-government and the course of the convention. The article shows by what methods the authorities tried to discipline advocates as a group and whether these actions had the effect expected by the authorities.

References

  1. Ambroziewicz Piotr, Jaka jest adwokatura?, „Prawo i Życie” 1984/19 [Google Scholar]
  2. Czas próby. O adwokatach – obrońcach ludzi i wartości, Komitet Helsiński w Polsce, zeszyt nr 5, Warszawa 1984 [Google Scholar]
  3. Fiedorczyk Piotr, Poznański Zjazd Adwokatury z 1981 r. w świetle materiałów Ministerstwa Sprawiedliwości, „Palestra” 2022/3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Krzemiński Zdzisław, Historia warszawskiej adwokatury, Warszawa 2005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Metelska Agnieszka, Adwokatura warszawska w latach nadziei i przełomu (1956–1989) (w:) Adwokatura warszawska w latach nadziei i przełomu (1956–2009), red. A. Flisek, Warszawa 2009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Niewiński Kamil, Nadzieje a rzeczywistość – samorządność i nadzór Ministra Sprawiedliwości w ustawie – Prawo o adwokaturze z 26.05.1982 r., „Palestra” 2022/3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Redzik Adam, Zarys historii samorządu adwokackiego w Polsce, Warszawa 2007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Tomaszek Andrzej, Hańba domowa czy brudna polityka? O „rezygnacji” Marii Budzanowskiej, „Palestra” 2024/2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Tomaszek Andrzej, Ktokolwiek widział, ktokolwiek wie, „Palestra” 2023/5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Zaborski Marcin, Maciej Bednarkiewicz 1940–2016. Adwokat, którego bał się gen. Czesław Kiszczak, „Palestra” 2019/1–2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Żuławski Jacek, Adwokatura w ostatniej dekadzie PRL. Historia samorządności, Kraków 2012. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.