Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

No. 7 (2023)

Artykuły

Do women judge differently? Some remarks on feminist interpretation

  • Anna Demenko
Published: 2024-02-05

Abstract

The goal of the study is to present the issue, discussed in legal theory and sociology, of the impact of sex of the judge on his/her judgements. The basic concepts of feminist interpretation, their application in practice, as well as empirical research on the decision-making process in adjudication, are discussed. The empirical research does not support any unambiguous conclusions, though the existence of a characteristic female perspective, influencing the interpretation and application of law, can be observed.

References

  1. Bourreau-Dubois Cecile, Doriat-Duban Myriam, Jeandidier Bruno, Rayaka Jean-Claude, Does gender diversity in panels of judges matter? Evidence from French child support cases, „International Review of Law and Economics” 2020/63 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cabaj Janusz, Critical legal studies a liberalna koncepcja prawa, [Google Scholar]
  3. „Ius Novum” 2013/3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabaj Janusz, Feministyczna jurysprudencja liberalizm versus radykalizm, „Ius Novum” 2010/4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cabaj Janusz, Prawne aspekty feminizmu kulturowego, „Ius Novum” 2011/1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Coontz Phyllis, Gender and judicial decisions: Do female judges decide cases differently than male judges?, „Gender Issues” 2000/18 [Google Scholar]
  7. Crawford Bridget, Stanchi Kathryn, Berger Linda, Feminist Judging Matters: How Feminist Theory and Methods Affect the Process of Judgment, „University of Baltimore Law Review” 2018/47 [Google Scholar]
  8. Demenko Anna, Przestępstwa popełniane przez wypowiedź, Warszawa 2021 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fish Stanley, Intention is all there is: A critical analysis of Aharon Barak’s purposive interpretation in law, „Cardozo Law Review” 2008/29, s. 1111–1112 [Google Scholar]
  10. Frydman Sawa, Dogmatyka prawa w świetle socjologii: studjum pierwsze: o wykładni ustaw (w:) Ogólna nauka o prawie, red. B. Wróblewski, Wilno 1936 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilligan Carol, Innym głosem, Warszawa 2015 [Google Scholar]
  12. Haire Susan B., Moyer Laura P., Diversity Matters: Judicial Policy Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, Charlottesville–Londyn 2015 [Google Scholar]
  13. Harris Allison P., Sen Maya, Bias and Judging, „Annual Review of Political Science” 2019/22 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jedlecka Wioletta, Wpływ myśli feministycznej na zmiany współczesnego prawa – szkic problemu, „Wrocławskie Studia Erazmiańskie” 2015/9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kohen Beatriz, Family judges in the city of Buenos Aires: a view from within, „International Journal of the Legal Profession” 2008/15 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lerch Kent D., Justitia im Bett des Prokrustes (w:) Recht vermitteln. Strukturen, Formen und Medien der Kommunikation im Recht, [Google Scholar]
  17. red. K.D. Lerch, Berlin–Nowy Jork 2005 [Google Scholar]
  18. Leszczyński Jerzy, O charakterze dyrektyw wykładni prawa, „Państwo i Prawo” 2007/3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Majury Diana, Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada, „Canadian Journal of Women and the Law” 2006/18 [Google Scholar]
  20. Möllers Thomas M.J., Juristische Methodenlehre, Monachium 2017 [Google Scholar]
  21. Morawski Lech, Co może dać nauce prawa postmodernizm, Toruń 2001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Otto Dianne, Feminist Judging in Action: Reflecting on the Feminist Judgments in International Law Project: Loveday Hodson and Troy Lavers (Eds): Feminist Judgments in International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2019, „Feminist Legal Studies” 2020/28 [Google Scholar]
  23. Schultz Urlike, Do Female Judges Judge Differently? Empirical Realities of a Theoretical Debate (w:) Women Judges in the Muslim World A Comparative Study of Discourse and Practice, red. N. Sonneveld, M. Lindbekk, Leiden–Boston 2017 [Google Scholar]
  24. Solimine Michael E., Wheatley Susan E., Rethinking Feminist Judging, „Indiana Law Journal” 1995/70 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sulikowski Adam, Idee i metody współczesnych krytycznych studiów nad prawem, „Przegląd Prawa Publicznego” 2015/7–8 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sulikowski Adam, Prawo i płeć. Kilka uwag o potencjale krytycznym feministycznej jurysprudencji, „Wrocławsko-Lwowskie Zeszyty Prawnicze” 2017/8 [Google Scholar]
  27. Zajkowski Józef, Wstęp do badań nad pojęciem interesu w prawie i procesie cywilnym (w:) Ogólna nauka o prawie, red. B. Wróblewski, Wilno 1936 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.