Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020)

Articles

The Obligation to Attend Religion Classes as a Manifestation of Special Institutional Authority

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2020.13.2-12  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2020-12-31

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the issue of acceptability of defining religion classes as a compulsory subject in public schools run by religious legal persons. However, while taking into account the achievements of the ecclesiastical law doctrine, the author analyzes this issue from the point of view of the administrative law and indicates the possibility of appropriately applying to this case the regulations pertaining to public establishments and the special institutional governance. In realizing the established research goals the author considers such issues as a school as a public establishment, requirements regarding running public schools, the legal character of statutes of schools or the unique characteristics of the schools run by denominations having legal personality. As a result of the conducted legal analysis the author concluded that when taking into consideration the voluntariness of attending religion classes it is acceptable to, under the special institutional governance, recognize religion classes as a compulsory subject in the public schools run by entities other than local self-government units. However, such possibility exists only when there is no catchment area established for such schools which results in the voluntariness of selecting such schools as a place of realization of compulsory schooling as well as in the prospect of selecting a different public school in which parents or pupils of legal age may resign from attending religion classes.

References

  1. Abramowicz, Aneta. 2012. “Prawo do nauki religii w publicznych szkołach i przedszkolach a zasada równouprawnienia związków wyznaniowych.” Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego 15:235–54. [Google Scholar]
  2. Balicki, Adam, Magdalena Pyter, and Jan Kokot. 2016. Ustawa o systemie oświaty. Ustawa o systemie informacji oświatowej. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  3. Berdzik, Joanna. 2016. “Komentarz do art. 12.” In Ustawa o systemie oświaty. Komentarz, ed. Wojciech Lachiewicz, and Joanna Pawlikowska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. Legalis. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boć, Jan, ed. 1997. Prawo administracyjne. Wrocław: Kolonia Limited. [Google Scholar]
  5. Czarnik, Zbigniew, and Jerzy Posłuszny. 2011. “Zakład publiczny.” In System Prawa Administracyjnego. Vol. 6: Podmioty administrujące, ed. Jerzy Hauser, Andrzej Wróbel, and Zygmunt Niewiadomski, 415–500. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mezglewski, Artur. 2004. Szkolnictwo wyznaniowe w Polsce w latach 1944–1980. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mezglewski, Artur. 2008. “Zarys statusu jednostki w zakresie wolności sumienia i religii.” In Prawo wyznaniowe, ed. Artur Mezglewski, Henryk Misztal, and Piotr Stanisz, 82–120. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ochendowski, Eugeniusz. 2001. Prawa Administracyjne część ogólna. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Dom Organizatora. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pilich, Mateusz. 2015. Ustawa o systemie oświaty. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wierzbowski, Marek. 2001. Prawo administracyjne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  11. Więcek, Katarzyna. 2014. “Prawo Kościoła Katolickiego do zakładania i prowadzenia szkół.” Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego 17:233–53. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zimmermann, Jan. 2008. Prawo administracyjne. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.