Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025)

Articles

Hyperpositivism as a Safety Valve in a Post- Communist Legal System: the Case of Poland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.9273  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-07-31

Abstract

The present paper suggests that hyperpositivism, considered a metanormative legal survival of the Communist rule in the Polish legal system, might serve as a safety valve preventing activities by public authorities that could destabilise the system. Hyperpositivism may entail a mental (even if only imaginary) barrier that stops those applying law from departing too far from the lexical meaning of a legal text. While the dangers of extreme formalism (or “ultra-formalism”) in the application of law, characteristic of hyperpositivism, are well-known, it might be the case that in a post-Communist system that has not matured yet after the transition to democracy, this feature of the system is a necessary element that keeps a precarious homeostasis in it. Its hasty removal – without other checks being established – may lead to chaos. The present paper indicates that recent months have seen some more abrupt cracks in the barrier of hyperpositivism, which are motivated rather instrumentally by the willingness to remove the legal changes made by the previous government and, allegedly, to restore the rule of law in Poland. In this process, non-formalist readings of legal texts have led some public authorities to ignore the decisions or even the existence of others. This seems to be destabilising the state in a geopolitical situation where stabilisation and consolidation should be sought instead. Without engaging in the ongoing political dispute, the paper, using the case study and dogmatic methods and drawing on a review of selected legal theoretical and comparative law literature, analyses two examples of such activities, including the outright questioning of the so-called “neo-judges” and the removal and appointments of the National Prosecutor’s office holders in 2024. In both situations, a more formalist reading of positive law would prevent dangerous consequences these situations are likely to produce for the legal system, the state and its citizens.

References

  1. Afer, Publius Terentius. 1891. Heauton Timorumenos, edited by John C. Rolfe. Boston: Ginn & Company. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1928. De Officiis. Translated by Walter Miller. London–New York: William Heinemann, G. P. Putnam’s Sons. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gizbert-Studnicki, Tomasz. 2013. “Pozytywistyczny park jurajski.” Forum Prawnicze 1:50-59. [Google Scholar]
  4. Husa, Jaakko. 2023. “Critical Approaches to Comparative Legal Linguistics.” In Research Handbook on Jurilinguistics, edited by Anne Wagner, and Aleksandra Matulewska, 52-69. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jałoszewski, Mariusz. 2024. “Sąd w Warszawie: Wyroki wydane przez neo-sędziów SN są nieistniejące. Nie trzeba ich stosować.” https://oko.press/neo-sedziowie-sn-wyroki-wydane-przez-sa-nieistniejace [accessed: 29.10.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Klimaszewska, Anna, Anna Machnikowska, and Sören Koch. 2023. “An Introduction to Polish Legal Culture.” In Handbook on Legal Cultures. A Selection of the World’s Legal Cultures, edited by Marius Mikkel Kjølstad, and Sören Koch, 273-331. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kusik, Przemysław. 2024. “International Media Coverage of Domestic Legal News: The Case of the Dispute over the Presidential Pardon Power in Poland.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law–Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37:2433-463. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lanius, David. 2019. Strategic Indeterminacy in the Law. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Legrand, Pierre. 1996. “European Legal Systems Are Not Converging.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45, no. 1:52-81. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mańko, Rafał. 2013a. “Survival of the Socialist Legal Tradition? A Polish Perspective.” Comparative Law Review 4, no. 2:1-28. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mańko, Rafał. 2013b. “Weeds in the Gardens of Justice? The Survival of Hyperpositivism in Polish Legal Culture as a Symptom/Sinthome.” Pólemos 7, no. 2:207-33. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mańko, Rafał. 2015. “Legal Survivals: A Conceptual Tool for Analysing Post-Transformation Continuity of Legal Culture.” In Tiesību Efektivitāte Postmodernā Sabiedrībā, edited by Jānis Rozenfelds, 16-27. Riga: Latvijas Universitāte. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mańko, Rafał. 2016. “Transformacja ustrojowa a ciągłość instytucji prawnych – uwagi teoretyczne.” Zeszyty Prawnicze 16, no. 2:5-35. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mańko, Rafał. 2023. “Legal Survivals and the Resilience of Juridical Form.” Law and Critique, 1-23. [Google Scholar]
  15. Markiewicz, Krystian. 2018. “Czy w Polsce są wolne sądy? Ocena z perspektywy trzech lat walki o praworządność.” IUSTITIA Kwartalnik Stowarzyszenia Sędziów Polskich 4. [Google Scholar]
  16. Matczak, Marcin. 2007. Summa iniuria. O błędzie formalizmu w stosowaniu prawa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR. [Google Scholar]
  17. Muszyński, Mariusz. 2023. “O alternatywnej praworządności.” Consilium Iuridicum 72:20-50. [Google Scholar]
  18. Niesiłowski, Jarosław. 2017. “Formalizm prawniczy.” In Leksykon współczesnej teorii i filozofii prawa. 100 podstawowych pojęć, edited by Jerzy Zajadło. Warszawa: C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nowacki, Józef. 1969. “The Material and Formal Conceptions of the Rule of Law.” Polish Round Table 3:81-88. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nowicki, Maciej. 2023. “Stanowisko Helsińskiej Fundacji Praw Człowieka w sprawie zmian w mediach publicznych.” https://hfhr.pl/aktualnosci/stanowisko-hfpc-ws-zmian-w-mediach-publicznych [accessed: 25.01.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pilarek, Jakub. 2024. “Sędzia sympatyzujący z Iustitią podważył status bodnarowskiego prokuratora.” https://wnet.fm/2024/09/30/sedzia-sympatyzujacy-z-iustitia-podwazyl-status-bodnarowskiego-prokuratora/ [accessed: 29.10.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  22. Przybył, Sebastian. 2024. “Szymon Hołownia ogłasza ‘bojkot’ TK. ‘Nie wchodzić do zatrutego źródła’.” https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/kraj/news-szymon-holownia-oglaszabojkot-tk-nie-wchodzic-do-zatrutego-,nId,7778542 [accessed: 31.10.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rojek-Socha, Patrycja. 2024. “Kolegium NSA: Nie ma podstaw do kwestionowania statusu asesorów.” https://www.prawo.pl/prawnicy-sady/neo-krs-a-asesorzy-w-sadach-administracyjnych-stanowisko-kolegium-nsa,528632.html [accessed: 30.10.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tobor, Zygmunt. 2013. W Poszukiwaniu intencji prawodawcy. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tobor, Zygmunt. 2020. “Wykładnia prawa.” In Wstęp do prawoznawstwa, edited by Józef Nowacki, and Zygmunt Tobor. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tomza, Anna. 2011. “Monografia Marcina Matczaka ‘Summa iniuria. O błędzie formalizmu w stosowaniu prawa’.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 1:86-102. [Google Scholar]
  27. VandenBos, Gary R. (ed.). 2015. APA Dictionary of Psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wyjadłowski, Piotr. 2024. “Herkules jest nieposłuszny! Istota sędziowskiego oporu oczami Ronalda Dworkina.” Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego 1:123-36. [Google Scholar]
  29. Žižek, Slavoj. 2008. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.