Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024)

Articles

Legislative Materials (Legislative History) and the Derivational Theory of Legal Interpretation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.8606  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2024-06-26

Abstract

The study addresses the issue of using legislative materials (legislative history) to interpret the law. This issue is considered from the point of view of the so-called derivational theory of legal interpretation formulated in Polish legal theory. The derivational theory of legal interpretation is treated as a framework and a starting point for developing an integrated theory of legal interpretation in Polish legal theory. The analyses contained in the article are theoretical in nature and apply a theoretical-legal method. The main thesis of the study is that the use of legislative materials should be included in the derivational model of interpretation, but with the application of the principle of their subsidiarity and the principle of assumed unanimity. The derivational theory is a comprehensive theory that formulates a normative (prescriptive) model of interpretation. The interpretive directives that make up this model refer to factors external to the actual legislator (in particular the rules of language) in order to objectify the interpretation process. It may seem that from the point of view of the derivational theory, the use of legislative history and the intent of the actual legislator for legal interpretation should be rejected. However, a closer analysis reveals that this is a false conclusion. One of the fundamental assumptions of the derivational theory is the postulate of striving for the greatest possible objectivity in the interpretation result. The subsidiary use of legislative materials may contribute to such objectification when reference to factors external to the actual legislator fails – it is inconclusive. However, the subsidiary use of legislative history is only possible if the analysis of legislative materials is conclusive, i.e. if it is possible to determine the clear legislative intent in accordance with the principle of assumed unanimity.

References

  1. Bielska-Brodziak, Agnieszka. 2017. Śladami prawodawcy faktycznego. Materiały legislacyjne jako narzędzie wykładni prawa. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bielska-Brodziak, Agnieszka, and Małgorzata Tyrybon, 2019. “Interpretacyjna wartość materiałów legislacyjnych w opiniach sądów administracyjnych.” Zeszyty Naukowe Sądownictwa Administracyjnego 82, no. 1:27-44. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bogucki, Olgierd. 2023. “Przekraczanie językowej granicy władzy interpretowania prawa.” Horyzonty Polityki 14, no. 48:79-96. https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2388 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogucki, Olgierd. 2020. “The Derivational Theory of Legal Interpretation in Polish Legal Theory.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 33:617-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09628-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09628-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Breyer, Stephen. 1992. “On the uses of legislative history in interpreting statutes.” South California Law Review 65:845-74. [Google Scholar]
  6. Choduń, Agnieszka. 2018. Aspekty językowe derywacyjnej koncepcji wykładni prawa. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cross, Jesse M. 2022. “Disaggregating Legislative Intent.” Fordham Law Review 90, no. 5:2221-268. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubiński, Łukasz. 2023. “Materiały legislacyjne w procesie interpretacyjnym.” Horyzonty Polityki 14, no. 48:59-78. https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2461 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekins, Richard. 2012. The Nature of Legislative Intent. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646999.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646999.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Godek, Andżelika. 2015. “On Legal Situations and the Interpretation of European Union Law.” Studia Prawa Publicznego 10, no. 2:35-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/spp.2015.2.10.2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Helios, Joanna, and Wioletta Jedlecka. 2018. “The Derivative Concept of Legal Interpretation in EU law.” Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, Przegląd Prawa i Administracji 115:131-44. 10.19195/0137-1134.115.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/0137-1134.115.9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Konca, Paulina. 2021. “Servants or Masters? Linguistic Aids in Legal Interpretation.” Ius Humani. Law Journal 10, no. 1:73-102. https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v10i1.237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v10i1.237 [Google Scholar]
  13. Krotoszyński, Michał. 2018. “Legislative History, Ratio Legis, and the Concept of the Rational Legislator.” In Ratio Legis. Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by Verena Klappstein, and Maciej Dybowski, 57-73. Heidelberd: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74271-7_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74271-7_4 [Google Scholar]
  14. Nourse, Victoria. 2012. “A Decision Theory of Statutory Interpretation: Legislative History by the Rules.” Yale Law Journal 122, no. 1:70-152. [Google Scholar]
  15. Raz, Joseph. 1996. “Intention in interpretation.” In The Autonomy of Law. Essays on Legal Positivism, edited by Robert P. George, 248-286. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267904.003.0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267904.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Tobor, Zygmunt. 2013. W poszukiwaniu intencji prawodawcy. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zieliński, Maciej. 1972. Interpretacja jako proces dekodowania tekstu prawnego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zieliński, Maciej. 1987. “Decoding Legal Text.” In Polish Contributions to the Theory and Philosophy of Law, edited by Zygmunt Ziembiński, 165-78. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004457041_013 [Google Scholar]
  19. Zieliński, Maciej, Olgierd Bogucki, Agnieszka Choduń, et al. 2009. “Zintegrowanie polskich koncepcji wykładni prawa.” Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 71, no. 4:23-39. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zieliński, Maciej. 2017. Wykładnia prawa. Zasady, reguły, wskazówki. 7th ed. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zieliński, Maciej. 2020. “The Derivational Theory of Legal Interpretation as an Integrated Theory.” In Poznań School of Legal Theory, edited by Paweł Kwiatkowski, and Marek Smolak, 163-73. Leiden: De Gruyter Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004448445_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004448445_11 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ziembiński, Zygmunt. 1960. “Przepis prawny a norma prawna.” Ruch Prawniczy. Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 22, no. 1:105-22. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.