Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego

Vol. 21 No. 23 (1) (2026)

Articles

The Incompatibility of Offices and Its Value in the Canonical Order (Canon 152 CIC/83; Canon 942 CCEO)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/bsawp.10713  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2026-05-26

Abstract

The differing provisions of Canons 152 CIC/83 and 942 CCEO regarding the incompatibility of offices became the subject of the author’s attention in this study. Therefore, he posed three research questions: first, about the ratio legis of these regulations; second, about the canonical concept of incompatibility of offices in the canonical order; and third, about the value of the provisions of canons 152 CIC/83 and 942 CCEO. Using a dogmatic-legal and comparative method, he demonstrated that the basis for such solutions is an ethical-juridical foundation expressed in the relationship between public administration and the titular of the office by virtue of canonical provision. The concept functioning in the system refers to the characteristics of offices, not the attributes of the person. The regulations existing in both the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (Canon 152 CIC/83; Canon 942 CCEO) do not have the character of invalidating laws (Canon 10 CIC/83; Canon 1495 CCEO).

References

  1. Abbas, Jobe. 2020. „Commentary of the can. 942 CCEO.” W A Guide to the Eastern Code. A Commentary on the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, red. Georges Ruyssen, 783-804. Rome: Edizioni Orientalia Christiana. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrieta, Juan I. 1996. „Comento al can. 152 CIC.” W Comentario exegético al Código de Derecho Canónico. T. 1, red. Angel Marzoa, Jorge Miras, i Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña, 934-36. Pamplona: EUNSA. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carrion, José M. 1985. La ley de la Iglesia. T. 1. Madrid: Sociedad de Educación Atenas. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiappetta, Luigi. 1996. ll Codice di Diritto Canonico. Commento giuridco- pastorale. T. 1. Roma: Edizioni Dehoniane. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cleve, Jürgen. 1999. Inkompatibilität und Kumulationsvrobot. Eine Untersuchung zu can. 152 CIC1983. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cortéz Dieguéz, Miriam. 2023. „Comento al can. 152 CIC.” W Código de Derecho Canónico. Edición bilingüe, 101. Salamanca: Biblioteca de Autores Cristanos. [Google Scholar]
  7. de Jesús Hernández, Luiz. 2012. „Oficios eclasiásticos incomapatibiles en Iglesia particular.” Revista Mexicana de Derecho Canónico 18:23-24. [Google Scholar]
  8. D’Ostilio, Francesco. 1977. „La incompatibilità degli offici nell’Ordinamento giuridico canonico.” Apollinaris 50, nr 3-4:346-77. [Google Scholar]
  9. Erdö, Peter. 1991. „De incompatibilitate officiorum, specialiter paroeciarum. Adnotationes ad Cann. 152 et 526.” Periodica 80:499-522. [Google Scholar]
  10. Erdö, Peter. 1989. „Ministerium, munus et officium in Codice Iuris Canonici.” Periodica 78:411-36. [Google Scholar]
  11. García Martín, Julio. 1999. Le norme generali del Codex Iuris Canonici. Roma: EDIURCLA. [Google Scholar]
  12. Huels, John M. 2019. „Commentary of the can. 942 CCEO.” W A Practical Commentary to the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches. T. 2, red. John. D. Paris, i Jobe Abbas, 1779-780. Montreal: Lebraire Wilson & Lafleur int. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lauhead, Sarah L. 2021. Canon 149 of the Code of Canon Law: Determining the Suitability of a Candidate for an Ecclesiastical Office. Pamplona: EUNSA. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pinto, Pio V. 2001. „Commento al can. 942 CCEO.” W Commento al Codice dei Canoni delle Chiese Orientali, red. Pio V. Pinto, 807. Città del Vaitcano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Google Scholar]
  15. Regatillo, Eduardus. 1961. Institutiones iuris canonici. Santander: Editorial «Sal Terrae». [Google Scholar]
  16. Socha, Heribert. 1983. „Allgemeine Normen.” W Münsterischer Kommentar zum Codex Iuris Canonici. T. 1, red. Klaus Lüdicke, ad 152. Essen: Ludgerus Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sobański, Remigiusz. 2003. „Komentarz do kan. 152 KPK/83.” W Komentarz do Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego. T. 1, red. Józef Krukowski, 243-44. Poznań: Pallotinum. [Google Scholar]
  18. Urrutia, Francisco J. 1983. De normis generalibus. Adnotationes in Codicem: Liber I. Romae: Typografia P.U.G. [Google Scholar]
  19. Viana, Antonio. 2020. „Officium” según derecho canónico. Pamplona: EUNSA. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wernz, Francisus, i Petrus Vidal. 1923. Ius canonicum Codicis normam exactum. T. 2. Romae: Apud Aedes Univeristatis Gregorianum. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.