Abstract
The article deals with the problem of the definition of religion between theology and religious studies. In the twentieth century, theological reflection on religion has gained increasing attention and, in this context, theologians frequently employed ideas drawn from religious studies. However, their field of interest tended to be restricted to certain selected approaches, while other sub‑disciplines, such as anthropology of religion, often remained unnoticed. Hence, the focus of this article is on the issue of the anthropological definition of religion and its implications for theology. The goals of this essay are: to present the conditions under which attitudes to “religion” drawn from anthropology of religion may be acceptable in theological reflection and to present the polythetic attitude as a possible solution to the issue. The main body of the article is based on terms and theories drawn from religious studies, whereas the overall argument is grounded in a theological perspective.
References
Anderwald A., O tożsamości teologii na tle relacji z naukami przyrodniczymi, [in:] Tożsamość teologii, A. Anderwald, T. Dola, M. Rusecki (eds.), Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole 2010, 149-171.
Anderwald A., Teologia a nauki przyrodnicze: Rola wiedzy przyrodniczej w dociekaniach teologicznych, Wydział Teologiczny Uniw. Opolskiego, Opole 2007.
Bambrough R., Universals and Family Resemblances, “Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series)” 61 (1960-1961), 207-222.
Bowie F., The Anthropology of Religion: An Introduction, Blackwell, Malden 2006.
Catechism of the Catholic Church: Revised in Accordance with the Official Latin Text Promulgated by Pope John Paul II, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City, 1997.
Definition, [in:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [accessed at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/definitions/, 12.12.2018].
Eller J.D., Introducing Anthropology of Religion, Routledge, New York/London 2007.
Gaudium et Spes: Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, promulgated by Pope Paul VI, December 7, 1965.
Gesché A., Le Christ, Éd. du Cerf, Paris 2001.
Kamykowski Ł., Teologia religii: Pojęcie - natura - przedmiot, [in:] Teologia religii: Chrześcijański punkt widzenia, G. Dziewulski (ed.), Wydawnictwo Księży Sercanów, Łódź/Kraków 2007, 21-33.
Leuba J.H., A Psychological Study of Religion, AMS Press, [s.l.] 1969.
Saler B., Conceptualizing Religion: The Matter of Boundaries, [in:] Understanding Religion: Selected Essays, B. Saler, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009, 172-180.
Saler B., Family Resemblance and the Definition of Religion, [in:] Understanding Religion: Selected Essays, B. Saler, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009, 159-171.
Saler B., Towards a Realistic and Relevant 'Science of Religion', “Method & Theory in the Study of Religion” 16 (2004), no. 3, 203-225.
Searle J.R., The Rediscovery of the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2005.
Seweryniak H., Teologia religii a teologia fundamentalna: Refleksja metodologiczno pedagogiczna, [in:] Teologia religii: Chrześcijański punkt widzenia, G. Dziewulski (ed.), Wydawnictwo Księży Sercanów, Łódź/Kraków 2007, 183-201.
Smith B.K., Exorcising the Transcendent: Strategies for Defining Hinduism and Religion, “History of Religions” 27 (1987), no. 1, 32-55.
Southwald M., Buddhism and the Definition of Religion, “Man (New Series)” 13 (1978), no. 3, 362-379.
Wiebe D., A Positive Episteme for the Study of Religion, “The Scottish Journal of Religious Studies” 6 (1985), no. 2, 78-95.
Wilson B.C., From the Lexical to the Polythetic: A Brief History of the Definition of Religion, [in:] What Is Religion?, T.A. Idinopulos, B.C. Wilson (eds.), Brill, Leiden/Boston 1998, 142 162.
Wittgenstein L., Philosophical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1958.
Woźniak R., Materialno-biologiczny wymiar obrazu Bożego w człowieku, “Scientia et Fides” 2 (2014), no. 2, 271-288.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
