Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

No. 1 (2024)

Artykuły

Preventive measures to secure claims in cases relating to Swiss franc loans after the judgment of the Court of Justice in case C-287/22, YQ and RJ v. Getin Noble Bank S.A.

  • Magdalena Matusiak-Frącczak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54383/0031-0344.2024.01.4  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2024-09-13

Abstract

On 15 June 2023, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in case C-287/22, YQ i RJ v. Getin Noble Bank S.A. The deliberation in the judgment focuses on the issue of preventive measures in cases involving Swiss franc loan agreements. Although EU Member States are free to determine the procedures for pursuing such claims, the relevant procedural provisions should respect the principle of effectiveness. Suspension of the payment of the monthly loan instalments for the duration of the proceedings in a case in which declaration of invalidity of the loan agreement is sought constitute an implementation of this principle.

References

  1. Dziurda Marcin (w:) M. Dziurda, Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Praktyczny komentarz do nowelizacji z 2023 roku, LEX/el. 2023, komentarz do art. 7301 k.p.c. [Google Scholar]
  2. Halberstam Daniel, Understanding national remedies and the principle of national procedural autonomy: a constitutional approach, „Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies” 2021/23, s. 128–158 [Google Scholar]
  3. Partyk, Tomasz (w:) Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Postępowanie nieprocesowe. Postępowanie w razie zaginięcia lub zniszczenia akt. Postępowanie zabezpieczające. Komentarz aktualizowany, red. O.M. Piaskowska, LEX/el. 2023, komentarz do art. 7301 k.p.c. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stefańska Ewa (w:) Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, t. 2, Art. 478–1217, red. M. Manowska, Warszawa 2021, komentarz do art. 7301 k.p.c. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stehlík Václav, Interim measures before national courts in the context of EU and Czech law, „International and Comparative Law Review” 2012/12(2), s. 7–42 [Google Scholar]
  6. Taborowski Maciej, Case C-432/05 Unibet – Some practical remarks on effective judicial protection, „Columbia Journal of European Law” 2008/14(3), s. 621–647 [Google Scholar]
  7. Widdershoven Rob, National procedural autonomy and general EU law limits, „Review of European Administrative Law” 2019/12(2), s. 5–34 [Google Scholar]
  8. Zawistowski Dariusz (w:) Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, t. 4, Artykuły 730–1088, red. T. Wiśniewski, LEX/el. 2023, komentarz do art. 7301 k.p.c. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.