Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Journals name baner

Nr 1(16) (2022)

Blok tematyczny: Niektóre problemy nowego porządku międzynarodowego

Perspektywy przywództwa międzynarodowego Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej w nowym ładzie międzynarodowym

Opublikowane: 2022-06-30

Abstrakt

The years 2018–2022 witnessed an acceleration of processes leading to an important transformation of the post-Cold War international order. The most important phenomena are: growing great power tensions (visible in the open Sino-American rivalry and, above all, in the Russian invasion of Ukraine), global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and (connected to the previous ones) weakening of the world economy’s growth dynamic. In such a turning point in international order’s evolution, the issue of international leadership acquires an outstanding importance. The declarations of PRC’s party-state leadership leave little doubt as to their aspirations to international leadership. The main aim of this article is to assess the perspectives for PRC to play a role of an international leader in the face of the aforementioned trends in the international order’s evolution. The main axis of the text is formed around three research questions: To what degree PRC meets the requirements of effective international leadership: power resources, vision of international order and other actors’ support? Do main processes transforming the current international order (great powers’ conflicts, transnational threats and economic difficulties) support or degrade China’s ability to exercise international leadership? What are the possible future scenarios concerning PRC’s international leadership?

Bibliografia

  1. Baker Dean (2020), China Has the World’s Largest Economy: Get Over It, Center for Economic and Policy Research, https://cepr.net/china-has-the-worlds-largest-economy-get-over-it/ (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldwin David A. (2016), Power and International Relations. A Conceptual Approach, Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brands Hal (2022), The Twilight Struggle: What the Cold War Teaches Us about Great-Power Rivalry Today, New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooks Stephen G., Wohlforth William C. (2016), The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China’s Rise and the Fate of America’s Global Position, „International Security”, 40 (3), s. 7–53, doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00225. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brzeziński Zbigniew (1997), The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives, New York: Perseus-Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan Gerald (2008), China joins global governance. The 10 conundrums, w: Wang Gungwu, Zheng Yongnian (red.), China and the New International Order, London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan Steve i in. (2021), Contesting Revisionism China, the United States, and the Transformation of International Order, New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Charap Samuel, Drennan John, Noël Pierre (2017), Russia and China: A New Model of Great-Power Relations, „Survival”, 59 (1), s. 25–42. [Google Scholar]
  9. Choo Jaewoo (2021), South Koreans’ Negative View of China is Nothing New, but is Getting Worse, PaCNet Pacific Forum, https://pacforum.org/publication/pacnet-1-south-koreans-negativeview-of-china-is-nothing-new-but-is-getting-worse (dostęp 8.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  10. Chor Davin, Li Bingjing (2021), Illuminating the Effects of the US-China Tariff War on China's Economy, NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES, 29349, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3940035. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chubb Andrew (2022), The Securitization of „Chinese Influence” in Australia, „Journal of Contemporary China”, Routledge, s. 1–18, doi: 10.1080/10670564.2022.2052437. [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng Yong (2008), China’s Struggle for Status The Realignment of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dittmer Lowell (2018), China’s Asia: Triangular Dynamics since the Cold War, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  14. Economy Elizabeth (2022) Xi Jinping’s New World Order: Can China Remake the International System? „Foreign Affairs”, 101 (1), s. 52–67. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fajgelbaum Pablo, Khandelwal Amit K. (2021), The Economic Impacts of the US-China Trade War, NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES, 29315, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3931838. [Google Scholar]
  16. Feng Zhang (2009), Rethinking the „Tribute System”: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics, „Chinese Journal of International Politics”, 2 (4), s. 545–574. [Google Scholar]
  17. Flaaen, Aaron, Pierce Justin (2019), Disentangling the Effects of the 2018–2019 Tariffs on a Globally Connected U.S. Manufacturing Sector, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 86, doi: 10.17016/feds.2019.086. [Google Scholar]
  18. Friedberg Aaron L. (2018), Globalisation and Chinese Grand Strategy, „Survival”, 60 (1), s. 7–40. [Google Scholar]
  19. Friis Karsten, Lysne Olav (2021), Huawei, 5G and Security: Technological Limitations and Political Responses, „Development and Change”, 52 (5), s. 1174–1195. [Google Scholar]
  20. Garcia-Herrero Alicia (2021), What is Behind China’s Dual Circulation Strategy, China Leadership Monitor, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3927117. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gartzke Erik (2007), Capitalist Peace, „American Journal of Political Science”, 51 (1). [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldstein Avery (2020), China’s Grand Strategy Under Xi Jinping Reassurance, Reform, and Resistance, „International Security”, 45 (1), s. 164–201, doi: 10.4324/9781003111047. [Google Scholar]
  23. He Chuan, Mau Karsten, Xu Mingzhi (2021), Trade Shocks and Firms Hiring Decisions: Evidence from Vacancy Postings of Chinese Firms in the Trade War, „Labour Economics”, 71. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoang Vu Le Thai, Nguyen Huy (2021), The Modern China-Russia-US Triangle, „The Diplomat”, https://thediplomat.com/2021/06/the-modern-china-russia-us-triangle/ (dostęp 8.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ikenberry Gilford J. (1998), Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order, „International Security”, 23 (3), s. 43–78. [Google Scholar]
  26. ‘Interim National Security Guidance’ (2021), https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  27. Jointly Shoulder Responsibility of Our Times, Promote Global Growth, Keynote Speech by H.E. Xi Jinping President of the People’s Republic of China At the Opening Session Of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2017 Davos, 17 January 2017 (2017) Xinhua, http://www.china.org.cn/node_7247529/content_40569136.htm (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaczmarski Marcin (2020), The Sino-Russian Relationship and the West, „Survival”, 62 (6), s. 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kang Dake (2020), China’s Diplomats Show Teeth in Defending Virus Response, „The Diplomat”, https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/chinas-diplomats-show-teeth-in-defending-virusresponse/ (dostęp 9.02.2021). [Google Scholar]
  30. Kang David C. (2007), China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia, New York: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Karp Paul, Davidson Helen (2020), China bristles at Australia’s call for investigation into coronavirus origin, „The Guardian”, 29 April, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/29/australiadefends-plan-to-investigate-china-over-covid-19-outbreak-as-row-deepens (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  32. Kurtzer Jacob (2020), China’s Humanitarian Aid: Cooperation amidst Competition, Center for Strategic and International Studies, https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-humanitarian-aidcooperation-amidst-competition (dostęp 9.02.2021). [Google Scholar]
  33. Leonard Mark (2009), Zrozumieć Chiny, Warszawa: Media Lazar/Nadir. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu Tao, Woo Wing Thye (2018), Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War, „China Economic Journal”, Routledge, 11 (3), s. 319–340, doi: 10.1080/17538963.2018.1516256. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lukin Alexander (2019), The US–China Trade War and China’s Strategic Future, „Survival”, 61 (1), s. 23–50. [Google Scholar]
  36. Malik Ammar. A. i in. (2021), Banking on the Belt and Road: Insights from a new global dataset of 13,427 Chinese development projects, https://docs.aiddata.org/ad4/pdfs/Banking_on_the_Belt_and_Road__Insights_from_a_new_global_dataset_of_13427_Chinese_development_projects.pdf (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  37. Maull Hanns W. (2019), The Once and Future Liberal Order, „Survival”, 61 (2). [Google Scholar]
  38. National Security Strategy of United States of America (2017), https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/new-national-security-strategy-new-era/ (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  39. Patrick Stewart (2020), When the System Fails, „Foreign Affairs”, 99 (4). [Google Scholar]
  40. Rai Ashok (2018), Quadrilateral Security Dialogue 2 (Quad 2.0)–a credible strategic construct or mere „foam in the ocean”? „Maritime Affairs”, 14 (2), s. 138–148, doi: 10.1080/09733159.2019.1572260. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rajah Roland (2021), The big bark but small bite of China’s trade coercion, theinterpreter, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/big-bark-small-bite-china-s-trade-coercion (dostęp 30.06.2021). [Google Scholar]
  42. Rudolf Peter (2021), The Sino-American World Conflict, „Survival”, 63 (2), s. 87–114. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schrader Matt (2020), Analyzing China’s Coronavirus Propaganda Messaging in Europe, GMF Alliance for Securing Democracies, https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/analyzing-chinascoronavirus-propaganda-messaging-in-europe/ (dostęp 9.02.2021). [Google Scholar]
  44. Shin Gi-Wook, Gordon Haley, Kim Hannah June (2022), South Koreans Are Rethinking What China Means to Their Nation, Stanford Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, https://fsi.stanford.edu/news/south-koreans-are-rethinking-what-china-means-their-nation (dostęp 8.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  45. Silva Diego Lopes da, Tian Nan, Beraud-Sudreau Lucie, Marksteiner Alexandra, Liang Xiao (2022), Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2021, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, https://www.sipri.org/publications/2022/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-world-militaryexpenditure-2021 (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  46. Sukadis Beni (2021), Protecting Indonesia’s Sovereignty in the North Natuna Sea, The Diplomat, https://thediplomat.com/2021/09/protecting-indonesias-sovereignty-in-the-north-natunasea/ (dostęp 8.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  47. Sułek Mirosław (2017), Transformacja globalnego układu sił po zimnej wojnie, w: Rocznik Strategiczny 2016/17, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. [Google Scholar]
  48. Swaine Michael D. (2018), Chinese Views of Foreign Policy in the 19th Party Congress, „China Leadership Monitor”, 55. [Google Scholar]
  49. „The Economist” (2019), The global list, 24 January, https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/01/24/globalisation-has-faltered (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  50. „The Economist”(2021), Closing argument, 8 May, https://www.economist.com/asia/2021/05/08/australias-debate-about-china-is-becoming-hot-angry-and-shrill (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  51. „The Economist” (2022a), Asia’s Ukraine dilemma, 23 April, https://www.economist.com/asia/2022/04/23/interests-not-values-underpin-asias-ambivalence-about-russia (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  52. „The Economist” (2022b), Disagree to agree, 13 April, https://www.economist.com/asia/2022/04/13/australian-politicians-need-to-think-harder-about-defence (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  53. „The Economist” (2022c), Game of chiplomacy, 29 January, https://www.economist.com/international/2022/01/29/will-china-dominate-the-world-of-semiconductors (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  54. „The Economist” (2022d), Nostalgia and Kalashnikovs, 12 March, https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2022/03/12/why-russia-wins-some-sympathy-in-africa-and-themiddle-east (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  55. „The Economist” (2022e), What Chinese public anger means, 30 April, https://www.economist.com/china/2022/04/30/why-some-chinese-are-angry-about-covid (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  56. The Elements of the China Challenge (2020), Office of Secretary of State, https://www.state.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/20-02832-Elements-of-China-Challenge-508.pdf (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  57. Thomas Christopher A. (2021) Lagging but motivated: The state of China’s semiconductor industry, Brookings, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/lagging-but-motivated-thestate-of-chinas-semiconductor-industry/ (dostęp 8.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  58. Titievskaia Jana, Stamegna Carla, Kononenko Vadim, Navarra Cecilia, Zumer Klemen (2020), Slowing down or changing track? Understanding the dynamics of ‘Slowbalisation’, PE 659.383, doi: 10.2861/914072. [Google Scholar]
  59. Top Exporters and Importers by country and region 2019 (no date), World Integrated Trade Solution, https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/WLD/Year/2019/TradeFlow/EXPIMP (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  60. U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council (TTC) (no date), US State Department, https://www.state.gov/u-s-eu-trade-and-technology-council-ttc/ (dostęp 9.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  61. United States Strategic Approach to The People’s Republic of China (2020), https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/united-states-strategic-approach-to-the-peoples-republic-of-china/ (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  62. Views of China and the Global Balance of Power (2015), https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/06/23/2-views-of-china-and-the-global-balance-of-power/ (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]
  63. Wiśniewski Rafał (2019), Chiny a alternatywna wizja ładu międzynarodowego, w: Kamil Smogorzewski, Bartłomiej E. Nowak, Wojciech Kostecki (red.), Przyszłość międzynarodowego ładu liberalnego i rola Europy, Warszawa: Akademia Finansów i Biznesu Vistula. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wiśniewski Rafał (2020) Wpływ współpracy i rywalizacji mocarstw na bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe w Azji Północno-Wschodniej w latach 1989–2014, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Politycznych i Dziennikarstwa UAM. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wiśniewski Rafał (2021), International leadership, great power competition, and the COVID-19 Pandemic – the case of Sino-American relations, w: Radoslaw A. Fiedler, Pohl Artur, Sang-Chul Park (red.), Cooperation versus rivalry in times of pandemic. Which will be the shape of international politics? Berlin: Logos, s. 36–54. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wiśniewski Rafał, Hensarling Brian (2015), Power in 2025: A Global Ranking, „R/evolutions Global Trends & Regional Issues”, 3 (1), s. 122–157. [Google Scholar]
  67. Yongjin Zhang, Buzan Barry (2012), The Tributary System as International Society in Theory and Practice, „The Chinese Journal of International Politics”, 5 (1), s. 3–36. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zoellick Robert B. (2005), Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility? New York: US State Department, https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/d/former/zoellick/rem/53682.htm (dostęp 7.05.2022). [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.