Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Journals name baner

Nr 2(07) (2017)

Artykuły

The Rise of Populist Electoral Authoritarianism in Turkey: a Case of Culturally Rooted Recidivism

Opublikowane: 2017-12-30

Abstrakt

The trend in Turkey’s politics toward “electoral authoritarianism” is rooted in the long history of modernization. Tensions between traditional society and modernizing elites (with strong links to the military) resulted in the series of military coups in the 20th century and weak civilian regimes. The originality of the rule of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) since its coming to power in 2002 is that it has been able to consolidate the support of less privileged strata and to establish full control over the state. How durable is this system remains an open question.

Bibliografia

  1. Demirel Tanel (2011), Türkiye’nin Uzun On Yılı: Demokrat Parti İktidarı ve 27 Mayıs Darbesi, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eroğul Cem (1970), Demokrat Parti: Tarihi ve İdeolojisi, Ankara: Siyasal Bilgiler. [Google Scholar]
  3. Frey Frederick W. (1965), The Turkish Political Elite, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hale William (1994), Turkish Military and Politics, London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hale William, Özbudun Ergun (2010), Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the AKP, Milton Park: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kalaycıoğlu Ersin (2017), Turkish Democratization Falters Again, In: Arno Scherzberg, Osman Can, İlyas Doğan (eds.), Regierungsysteme im Lichte vom “Checks and Balances” (p. 10–15), Münster: LIT Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  7. Keyder Çağlar (1987), State and Class in Turkey: A Study in Capitalist Development, London: Verso. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lerner Daniel (1958), The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis Bernard (1961), The Emergence of Modern Turkey, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Loğoğlu Ö. Faruk (1998), İsmet İnönü and the Making of Modern Turkey, Ankara: İnönü Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  11. Niyazi Berkes (1998), The Development of Secularism in Turkey, London: C. Hurst. [Google Scholar]
  12. Özbudun Ergun (1988), The Status of the President of the Republic Under the Turkish Constitution of 1982: Presidentialism or Parliamentarism?, In: Metin Heper, Ahmet Evin (eds.), State, Democracy and the Military: Turkey in the 1980s (p. 37–62), Berlin: Walter [Google Scholar]
  13. de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  14. Özbudun Ergun (2000), Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation, Boulder: Lynne Rienner. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schedler Andreas (2013), Politics of Uncertainty, Oxford; Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tuncer Erol, Tuncer Bülent (2016), Seçim 2015: 1 Kasım 2015 Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri, Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme, Ankara: TESAV. [Google Scholar]
  17. Turan Ilter (2015), Turkey’s Difficult Journey to Democracy: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Turan İlter (2017), Turkey’s Constitutional Debate: Presidentialism Alla Turca or Parliamentary Government, German Marshall Fund of the United States, On Turkey Reports (April 10th). [Google Scholar]
  19. Turan İlter, Gürsoy Yaprak (2014), The Role of the EU in Changing the Role of the Military in Turkish Politics, “European Review of International Studies”, Vol.1, p. 132–140. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yılmaz Hakan (1977), Democratization from Above in Response to International Contexts in Turkey, 1945–1950, “New Perspectives on Turkey” (Fall 1977), p. 1–37. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.