Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

No. 1(12) (2020)

Artykuły

National identification in a democratic society. A view from the psychosocial perspective

Published: 2020-06-26

Abstract

As some researchers note, national identity is probably the only form of identity for which people are ready to give their own lives. Deprived of the experience of personal contact, the strong sense of belonging to the national group must consist of imagining oneself as entwined with crowds of anonymous compatriots in an invisible, but realistically experienced bond. Though, the concepts of national identity and national identification are often treated interchangeably. they are not equivalent. Group identity means the fact of belonging to a specific group, combined with having its cognitive representation. Identification refers to the individual-group personal relationship, and describes the strength of the emotional bond felt with other members and the importance of a given group identity. This paper presents psychological origins of national identification, linking them to the deepest and most basic epistemic, motivational and existential human needs. Awareness of identification with the national group determines the whole range of psychological phenomena from various levels of analysis. From relatively simple manifestations of affect to complex ideological orientations – they all have specific relationships with how people understand democracy and what type of democracy they prefer. The empirical evidence cited in this text proves that the strengthening of the liberal democracy and its cultural values is accompanied by the devaluation of national/patriotic identification in the utilitarian (as a socially dysfunctional phenomenon) as well as in moral sense (as a source of hostility and intolerance). However, other empirical results show national identification as a necessary component of social bonds, and a basis of social mobilization around important collective goals.

References

  1. Adorno Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswick Else, Levinson Daniel J., Sanford Nevitt (1950), The authoritarian personality, New York: Norton. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson Benedict (1997), Wspólnoty wyobrażone. Rozważania o źródłach i rozprzestrzenieniu się nacjonalizmu, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak. [Google Scholar]
  3. Asbrock Frank, Fritsche Immo (2013), Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: Who is being threatened, the Me or the We? „International Journal of Psychology”, 48, p. 35–49. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bar-Tal Daniel (1997), The monopolization of patriotism, in: Daniel Bar-Tal, Ervin Staub (eds.), Patriotism: in the lives of individuals and nations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall, p. 246–270. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bizumic Boris., Duckitt John, Popadic Dragan, Dru Vincent, Krauss Stephen (2009), A cross cultural investigation into a reconceptualization of ethnocentrism, „European Journal of Social Psychology”, 39, p. 871–899. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bizumic Boris, Duckitt John (2012), What Is and Is Not Ethnocentrism? A Conceptual Analysis and Political Implications, „Political Psychology”, 33, p. 887–909. [Google Scholar]
  7. Blank Thomas, Schmidt Peter (2003), National Identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or Patriotism? An Empirical Test With Representative Data, „Political Psychology”, 2, p. 289–312. [Google Scholar]
  8. Błażewicz Marek (2018), Autorytaryzm, niepewność Ja, identyfikacja grupowa i postawy wobec grupy obcej, Unpublished dissertation, Warszawa: Wydział Psychologii UW. [Google Scholar]
  9. Boski Paweł (1992), O byciu Polakiem w ojczyźnie i o zmianach tożsamości kulturowo-narodowej na obczyźnie, in: Paweł Boski, Maria Jarymowicz, Hanna Malewska-Peyre (eds.), Tożsamość a odmienność kulturowa, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brewer Marilynn B. (1999), The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? „Journal of Social Issues”, 55, p. 429–444. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brewer Marilynn B. (2003), Intergroup relations, Buckingham: Open University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cameron James E. (2004), A three factor model of social identity, „Self and Identity”, 3, p. 239–262. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cashdan Elizabeth (2001), Ethnocentrism and xenophobia: A cross-cultural study, „Current Anthropology”, 42, p. 760–765. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cichocka Aleksandra, Golec de Zavala Agnieszka (2011), Kolektywny narcyzm a sprawa polska, in: Mirosław Kofta, Michał Bilewicz (eds.), Wobec obcych. Zagrożenia psychologiczne a stosunki międzygrupowe, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, p. 232–247. [Google Scholar]
  15. Deutsch Max, Gerard Harold B. (1955), A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment, „The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology”, 51, p. 629–636. [Google Scholar]
  16. Greenaway Katharine H., Haslam S. Alexander, Cruwys Tegan, Branscombe Nyla R. (2015), From „we” to „me”: Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 109, p. 53–74. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haidt Jonathan (2012), The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, New York: Pantheon. [Google Scholar]
  18. Haidt Jonathan, Craig Joseph (2007), The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules, in: Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence, Stephen Stich (eds.), The innate mind, New York: Oxford [Google Scholar]
  19. University Press, p. 367–391. [Google Scholar]
  20. Herrmann Richard, Isernia Pierangelo, Segatti Paolo (2009), Attachment to the Nation and International Relations: Dimensions of Identity and Their Relationship to War and Peace, „Political Psychology”, 30, p. 721–753. [Google Scholar]
  21. Inglehart Ronald, Welzel Christian (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Inglehart Ronald, Welzel Christian (2010), Changing Mass Priorities: The Link between Modernization and Democracy, „Perspectives on Politics”, 8, p. 551–567. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kelman Herbert (1969), Patterns on personal involvement in national system: A social-psychological analysis of political legitimacy, in: James Rosenau (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelman Herbert (1997), Nationalism, patriotism and national identity: Social-psychological Dimensions, in: Daniel Bar-Tal, Ervin Staub (eds.), Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall, p. 165–189. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kosterman Rick, Feshbach Seymour (1989), Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes, „Political Psychology”, 10, p. 257–274. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kreuder-Sonnen Christian (2018), An authoritarian turn in Europe and European Studies? „Journal of European Public Policy”, 25 (3), p. 452–464. [Google Scholar]
  27. LeVine Robert A., Campbell Daniel (1972), Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior, New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  28. Levitsky Steven, Ziblatt Daniel (2018), How Democracies Die, New York: Crown. [Google Scholar]
  29. McFarland Samuel, Hackett Justin, Hamer Katarzyna, Katzarska-Miller Iva, Malsch Anna, Reese Gerhard, Reysen Stephen (2019), Global Human Identification and Citizenship: A Review of Psychological Studies, „Advances in Political Psychology”, 40, Suppl. 1. [Google Scholar]
  30. Miller David (1995), On nationality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mounk Yascha (2018), The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It, Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Müller Jan-Werner (2007), Constitutional Patriotism, Princeton–Oxford: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  33. Popper Karl (1987), Społeczeństwo otwarte i jego wrogowie, Niezależna Oficyna Wydawnicza. [Google Scholar]
  34. Radkiewicz Piotr (2019), Patriotyzm, etnocentryzm, nacjonalizm. Perspektywa makropsychologiczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. [Google Scholar]
  35. Reykowski Janusz (1997), Patriotism and the collective system of meanings, in: Daniel Bar-Tal, Ervin Staub (eds.), Patriotism: in the lives of individuals and nations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall, p. 108–128. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rothbart Myron, Taylor Marjorie (1992), Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds, in: Klaus Fiedler, Gun R. Semin (eds.), Language, Interaction and Social Cognition, Newbury Park: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  37. Scheepers Peer, Felling Albert, Peters Jan (1989), Ethnocentrism in the Netherlands: a typological analysis, „Ethnic and Racial Studies”, 12, p. 289–307. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schatz Robert T., Staub Ervin, Lavine Howard (1999), On the Varieties of National Attachment: Blind versus Constructive Patriotism, „Political Psychology”, 20, p. 151–174. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schatz Robert T., Lavine Howard (2007), Waving the flag: National symbolism, social identity, and political engagement, „Political Psychology”, 28, 329–355. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwartz Shalom (2006), Basic human values: theory measurement and applications, „Revue Française de Sociologie”, 47, 929–968. [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwartz Shalom, Cieciuch Jan, Vecchione Michele, Davidov Eldad, Fischer Ronald Beierlein Constanze, Ramos Alice, Verkasalo Markku, Lönnqvist Jan-Erik, Demirutku Kursad, Dirilen-Gumus Ozlem, Konty Mark (2012), Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 103, p. 663–688. [Google Scholar]
  42. Shweder Richard A., Much Nancy C., Mahapatra Manamohan, Park Lawrence (1997), „The Big three” of Morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the „big three” explanations of Suffering, in: Allan Brandt, Paul Rozin (eds.), Morality and Health, New York: Routledge, p. 119–169. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sidanius James, Pratto Felicia (1999), Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression, New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  44. Skarżyńska Krystyna (2005), Człowiek a polityka. Zarys psychologii politycznej, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. [Google Scholar]
  45. Skarżyńska Krystyna, Poppe Edwin (1997), Patriotyzm i nacjonalizm a spostrzeganie cech Polaków i innych narodowości, „Przegląd Psychologiczny”, 3, p. 179–199. [Google Scholar]
  46. Solomon Sheldon, Greenberg Jeff, Pyszczynski Tom (1991), A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews, „Advances in Experimental Social Psychology”, 24, p. 93–159. [Google Scholar]
  47. Staub Ervin (1997), Blind versus constructive patriotism. Moving from embeddedness in the group to critical loyalty and action, in: Daniel Bar-Tal, Ervin Staub (eds.), Patriotism: In the lives of individuals and nations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall, p. 213–228. [Google Scholar]
  48. Staub Ervin (1999), The roots of evil: Social conditions, culture, personality, and basic human needs, „Personality and Social Psychology Review”, 3, p. 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sumner William G. (1906), Folkways, New York: Ginn. [Google Scholar]
  50. Szacki Jerzy (1997), Wstęp. Powrót idei społeczeństwa obywatelskiego, in: Jerzy Szacki (ed.), Ani książę, ani kupiec: obywatel, Warszawa: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego, p. 5–62. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tajfel Henry, Turner John C. (1979), An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, in: William G. Austin, Stephen Worchel (eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations, Monterey: Brookes-Cole, p. 33–47. Tajfel Henry, Turner John C. (1986), The social identity theory of intergroup behavior, in: William G. Austin, Stephen Worchel (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, Chicago: Nelson, p. 7–24. [Google Scholar]
  52. Taylor Charles (1998), The dynamics of democratic exclusion, „Journal of Democracy”, 9, p. 143–156. [Google Scholar]
  53. Theiss-Morse Elizabeth (2009), Who Counts as an American? The Boundaries of National Identity, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  54. Turner John C., Hogg Michael A., Oakes Penelope, Reicher Stephen D., Wetherell Margaret S. (1987), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory, Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wnuk-Lipiński Edmund (2005), Socjologia życia publicznego, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. [Google Scholar]
  56. Worchel Stephen, Coutant Dawna (1997), The tangled web of loyalty: Nationalism, patriotism and ethnocentrism, in: Daniel Bar-Tal, Ervin Staub (eds.), Patriotism: In the lives of individuals and nations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall, p. 190–210. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.