Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 3 (2010)

Articles

Philosophy of Law and General Philosophy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.6612  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2010-12-31

Abstract

Philosophy of law from the beginnings of philosophy was treated as the part of the general philosophy. Separateness of philosophy of law from general philosophy arised from the end of the XVIII century. Actually philosophy of law is treated as autonomous academic discipline with many connections with general philosophy and another academic disciplines of philosophy. Inspirations of jurisprudence for philosophy and contrary – philosophy for jurisprudence – are very meanigful in discussions relations philosophy of law with general philosophy. During the newest times, according to postmodernism inspirations, are developing different currents of the philosophy of law, among them – biojurisprudence.

References

  1. K. Amerikas, O. Hoeffe (red.), Kants Moral and Legal Philosophy, Cambridge University Press 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Alexy, The Nature of Legal Philosophy, „Ratio Juris” Vol. 17, nr 2, June 2004, s. 156–167. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Alexy, Die Natur der Rechtsphilosophie [w:] W. Brugger, U. Neumann, S. Kirste (red.), Rechtsphilosophie im 21. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt a. Main 2008, s. 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Brugger, Das antropologische Kreuz der Entscheidung in Politik und Recht, 2nd ed. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Brugger, U. Neumann, S. Kirste (eds.), Rechtsphilosophie im 21. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt a. Main 2008. [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Cackowski, Filozofia a nauki szczegółowe [w:] Filozofia a nauka. Zarys encyklopedyczny, Ossolineum 1987. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Goldmann, Conference Report. Pointed Reasoning on Normativity: Young Researches in Legal Philosophy Meet in Würzburg, „German Law Journal” nr 2, 1 February 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gralf-Peter Calliess, Peter Zumbansen, Law the State and Evolutionary Theory: Interoduction, „German Law Journal” nr 4, 1 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. E. Hergert, Contemporary German Legal Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania Press 1996. [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Hilgendorf, Die Renaissance der Rechtstheorie zwischen 1965 und 1985, Würzburg 2005. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Kaufmann, W. Hassemer, U. Neumann (red.), Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart, Heidelberg 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Matthias, Contemporary Legal Philosophy in Germany, „Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie”, Vol. 93, nr 4, October 2007, s. 519–539. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Opałek, Główne kierunki niemieckiej teorii i filozofii prawa po II wojnie światowej [w:] tenże, Studia z teorii i filozofii prawa, Kraków 1997. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Pattaro, A. Treatise of Legal Philosophy nad General Jurisprudence, „Ratio Juris” vol. 19, Issue 4, November 2006, s. 489–500. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Peters, H. Schwenke, Comparative Law Beyond Post-Modernism, „International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  16. Danny Priel, The Boundaries of Law and the Purpose of Legal Philosophy, „Law and Philosophy”, vol. 27, nr 6, November 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yvonne Sherratt, Continental Philosophy of Social Science, Cambridge University Press 2006. [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Smith, German Philosophy: Language and Style, „Topoi” 1991, nr 10, s. 155–161. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ch. Thornhill, German Political Philosophy. The Metaphysics of Law, Routledge 2006. [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Tokarczyk, Komparatystyka prawnicza, wyd. IX, Warszawa 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Tokarczyk, Filozofia prawa, wyd. 11, Warszawa 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Tokarczyk, Filozofia prawa wobec XXI wieku [w:] Filozofia wobec XXI wieku, pod red. L. Gawora, Lublin 2004. [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Tokarczyk, Główni przedstawiciele niemieckiej filozofii prawa, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2009, nr 1. [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Zajadło (red.), Przyszłość dziedzictwa, jako t. II tryptyku Współczesna niemiecka filozofia prawa, Gdańsk 2008. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.