Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie

Tom 19 Nr 1 (2026)

Artykuły

Between Automation and Regulatory Chaos: Artificial Intelligence in Contemporary Public Administration and the Media Space

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.10359  [Google Scholar]
Opublikowane: 30.06.2026

Abstrakt

This article analyses the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on administration, public management, and the media. It demonstrates that AI is becoming a key factor in transforming these areas, while institutional and regulatory frameworks are not keeping pace with its development. The authors emphasise that AI can support data analysis and accelerate decision-making, but it also entails risks: misinformation, polarisation, dependence on technology, and the erosion of cognitive skills. The presented study employed a mixed approach (expert interviews, content analysis, and case studies). The results indicate that AI is perceived as a technology with great potential, but its systemic implementation in Poland is lacking, especially in public administration. In diplomacy, AI can support analysis and automation, but it cannot replace human relationships. Experts call for the development of digital skills, transparency of algorithms, and international cooperation on AI regulations.

Bibliografia

  1. Bano, Muneera, et al. 2025. “Mapping the Scholarly Landscape on AI and Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 20(2):171-206. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bullock, Justin B. 2019. “Artificial intelligence, discretion, and bureaucracy.” American Review of Public Administration 49(7):751-61. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chesney, Robert, and Danielle Citron. 2019a. “Deepfakes and the New Disinformation War.” Foreign Affairs 98(1):147-55. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chesney, Robert, and Danielle Citron. 2019b. “Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security.” California Law Review 107:1753-819. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cinelli, Matteo, et al. 2021. “The echo chamber effect on social media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(9):e2023301118. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eubanks, Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality. St. Martin’s Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Floridi, Luciano. 2021. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gillespie, Tarleton. 2018. Custodians of the Internet. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hasselbalch, Gry. 2021. Data Ethics of Power. Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hocking, Brian, et al. 2012. Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Clingendael Institute. [Google Scholar]
  12. Katzenbach, Christian, and Lena Ulbricht. 2019. “Algorithmic governance.” Internet Policy Review 8(4). [Google Scholar]
  13. Kreps, Sarah, and Doug Kriner. 2023. “How AI Threatens Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 34(4):122-31. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuziemski, Maciej, and Gianluca Misuraca. 2020. “AI governance in the public sector.” Telecommunications Policy 44(6):101976. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee, Kai-Fu. 2018. AI Superpowers. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [Google Scholar]
  16. Margetts, Helen, and Cosmina Dorobantu. 2019. “Rethinking government with AI.” Nature 568:163-65. [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown. [Google Scholar]
  18. Omand, David, and Mark Phythian. 2018. Principled Spying: The Ethics of Secret Intelligence. Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble. Penguin Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rana, Kishan S. 2020. 21st Century Diplomacy. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sunstein, Cass R. 2017. Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Taddeo, Mariarosaria, and Luciano Floridi. 2018. “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in International Affairs.” Chatham House Research Paper. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wirtz, Bernd W. et al. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector – Applications and Challenges.” International Journal of Public Administration 42(7):596-615. [Google Scholar]
  24. Woolley, Samuel C., and Phil N. Howard. 2018. Computational Propaganda. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wyatt, Sally. 2008. “Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism”. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward Hackett et al., 3rd ed. 165080. MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zuboff, Shosana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. PublicAffairs. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.