Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Kanonistów Polskich

Vol. 33 No. 36 bis (2023)

Articles

Baptism of a Child with One of the Spouses (Parents) Objecting

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32077/bskp.7265  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-11-21

Abstract

The opposition of one of the parents to the child’s baptism is a specific situation in which the conflict within the family concerns the space characteristic of the Church’s mission. Therefore, this requires a deeper analysis of the Church’s teaching and a combination of several issues.

The Author presents some legal norms regarding baptism from the perspective of the Church’s concern for conditions favouring the growth of sacramental grace in the life of the baptised. Baptism, as the gate to the sacraments, includes man in Christ’s salvific work gives him access to the fullness of the means of salvation in the Church. Performing baptism means accepting its purpose, consenting to direct the baptised toward the fullness of life of faith. This approach justifies the necessity of pastoral involvement and the requirements for candidates for baptism who have reached the age of seven, as well as for parents asking for baptism for their children.

In connection with the dispute concerning the beliefs of the parents, the Author refers to the regulations for the Catholic upbringing of offspring in mixed marriages. These norms, specifying the duties of the Catholic party, leave room for dialogue with the spouse. The author also presents the condition of a person who, although not baptised, can open herself to God’s saving action.

Finally, the topic is approached from the perspective of a child. Her relationship with the parents is reflected in the way she builds a relationship with God. Disruptions in these references can affect both the child’s psychological condition and the maturity of her faith in later years. Therefore, in the case of a serious conflict arising from world view differences, it seems reasonable to suggest to the believing party to postpone baptism until the situation improves or the child is enrolled in catechumenate around the age of discretion. It is also necessary to offer appropriate pastoral assistance. Deepening the parent’s faith also has a beneficial effect on the child’s attitude.

References

  1. Brzemia-Bonarek, Aleksandra, and Szymon Drzyżdżyk. 2015. “Chrzest dziecka wbrew woli rodziców. Analiza teologiczno-prawna.” In Rozwój dogmatu trynitarnego. Perspektywa historiozbawcza, edited by Arkadiusz Baron, Jarosław Kupczak, and Jan D. Szczurek, 175-99. Kraków: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie. Wydawnictwo naukowe. http://dx.doi.org/10.15633/9788374384162.07 [Google Scholar]
  2. Coccopalmerio, Francesco. 2011. “Die kirchliche communio: was das Konzil sagt und worüber die Codices schweigen.” In Der Kirchenaustritt im staatlichen und kirchlichen Recht, edited by Elmar Güthoff, Stephan Haering, and Helmuth Pree, 90-123. Freiburg–Basel–Wien: Verlag Herber GmbH. [Google Scholar]
  3. Composta. Dario. 2001. “Commento al can. 868.” In Commento al Codice di Diritto Canonico, edited by Pio Vito Pinto, 540. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gänswein, Georg. 1997. “Baptismo homo Ecclesiae Christi incorporatur. Zur Rezeption und Interpretation der rechtlichen Bestimmungen über die Kirchenzugehörigkeit im Codex Iuris Canonici von 1983.” Ius Ecclesiae 9, no. 1:47-79. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jaworski, Marian. 2020. “Wprowadzenie do deklaracji o wolności religijnej.” In Sobór Watykański II, Konstytucje. Dekrety. Deklaracje, tekst polski, nowe tłumaczenie, 405-409. Poznań: Pallottinum. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kiessling, Florian, and Josef Perner. 2014. “God–mother–baby: What children think they know.” Child development 85, no. 4:1601-616. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lewicka, Monika. 2010. “Wpływ relacji małżeńskich na dziecko.” Studia Bydgoskie 4:131-41. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mistò, Luigi. 2011. “La „Dignitatis humanae”. Nuovo modello per la libertà religiosa.” Ephemerides Iuris Canonici 5, no. 1:13-38. [Google Scholar]
  9. Molenda, Andrzej. 2017. “Indywidualna religijność narzędziem wykluczenia. Przezwyciężanie projekcji celem religijnej edukacji.” In Między ekskluzją a inkluzją w edukacji religijnej, edited by Monika Humeniuk-Walczak, and Iwona Paszenda, 208-16. Wrocław: Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mucha, Marta. 2019. Władza rodzicielska a prawo małoletniego do samodzielnej decyzji o przyjęciu chrztu. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Scriptum. [Google Scholar]
  11. Petts, Richard J., and Chris Knoester. 2007. “Parents’ Religious Heterogamy and Children’s Well‐Being.” Journal for the Scientific study of Religion 46, no. 3:373-89. [Google Scholar]
  12. Podczasik, Monika. 2014. “Rodzina i religijność jej dzieci a stosunek do wiary.” Family Forum. Roczniki Instytutu Nauk o Rodzinie 4:163-81. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ratzinger, Joseph. 2016. “Kwestie teologiczne na Soborze Watykańskim II.” In Joseph Ratzinger. Opera omnia. O nauczaniu II Soboru Watykańskiego. Formułowanie, przekaz, interpretacja. Vol. 7/1, translated by Wiesław Szymula, edited by Krzysztof Góźdź, and Marzena Górecka, 288-303. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL. [Google Scholar]
  14. Richert, Rebekah A., and Justin L. Barrett. 2005. “Do you see what I see? Young children’s assumptions about God’s perceptual abilities.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 15, no. 4:283-95. [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith, Christian. 2003. “Theorizing Religious Effects Among American Adolescents.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42, no. 1:17-30. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tejero, Eloy. 2011. “Przyjmujący chrzest.” In Codex Iuris Canonici. Kodeks Prawa Kanonicznego. Komentarz. Powszechne i partykularne ustawodawstwo Kościoła katolickiego. Podstawowe akty polskiego prawa wyznaniowego. Edycja polska na podstawie wydania hiszpańskiego, edited by Piotr Majer, 665-69. Kraków: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]
  17. Trempała, Janusz. 2011. Psychologia rozwoju człowieka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zubert, Bronisław. 1996. “Chrzest dziecka wbrew woli rodziców: próba krytycznej wykładni kan. 868 § 2 KPK 1983.” Prawo Kanoniczne 39, no. 3-4:43-64. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.