Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 34 No. 37 (2024)

Articles

Disciplinary Procedures in the Early Church

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32077/bskp.8004  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2024-06-11

Abstract

The paper refers to numerous documents from the period of the early Church which give testimony to the fact that the Church was never ruled by a charismatic anarchy or boundless democracy. Nevertheless, the data concerning the arrangement of the Church, which is passed on to us through the Scriptures, specifically the New Testament, and the writings of Apostolic Fathers, is not found in the form of a systematic treatise. Rather, it is found occasionally, mostly in connection with resolving some concrete issue. It is therefore necessary to arrange these various mentions in logical accordance with one another. The text of the paper firstly analyzes the issue of charismatic authority which is, above all, described in the Acts of the Apostles, Pauline letters, and especially in the early Christian treatise, the Didache. This treatise also mentions the hierarchical duties of the bishops and deacons, which can also already be seen in the New Testament alongside the duties of apostles, prophets, teachers, evangelists and presbyters. Some of the Church offices mentioned have primarily a missionary role, others are established for the pastoral care of existing and stable Christian communities. The Church order described in the eighteenth chapter of the Gospel according to St. Matthew is chiefly addressed to these stable communities. The First Epistle of Clement, written still in the first Christian century, gives testimony to the deposing of presbyters in the Church of Corinth and the intervention of the Roman authority in this dispute. Canon Law, which gradually begun to develop in the Church, followed directly in the footsteps of these disciplinary customs, which we know from early Christian literature.

References

  1. Becker, Jürgen. 1998. Paulus. Der Apostel der Völker. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838520148 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger, Klaus. 2011. Kommentar zum Neuen Testament. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14315/9783641311728 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dalla Torre, Giuseppe. 1996. La città sul monte. Contributo ad una teoria canonistica sulle relazioni fra Chiesa e Communità politica. Roma: An Veritas Editrice. [Google Scholar]
  4. Denzinger, Heinrich, and Peter Hünermann. 1999. Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum. Kompendium der Glaubensbekenntnisse und kirchlicher Lehrentscheidungen. Lateinisch-Deutsch. Freiburg in Breisgau: Herder. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fischer, Joseph A. 1964. Die Apostolischen Väter. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gnilka, Joachim. 1996. Paulus von Tarsus – Apostel und Zeuge. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. [Google Scholar]
  7. Harnack, Adolf von. 1929. Einführung in die alte Kirchengeschichte. Das Schreiben der römischen Kirche an die korinthische aus der Zeit Domitians (I. Klemensbrief). Leipzig: J.C. Hinrich. [Google Scholar]
  8. Harnack, Adolf von. 1977. “Die christlichen Missionare: Apostel, Propheten und Lehrer als Einheit.” In Das kirchliche Amt im Neuen Testament, edited by Karl Kertlege, 30-44. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [Google Scholar]
  9. Klausnitzer, Wolfgang. 2004. Der Primat des Bischofs von Rom. Entwicklung – Dogma – Ökumenische Zukunft. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kryštof (arcibiskup). 2000. Pravoslavný svět. Přehledné dějiny patriarchátů a místních církví [The Orthodox World. An Overview of the History of Patriarchates and Local Churches]. Prešov: Pravoslávna bohoslovecká fakulta Prešovskej univerzity v Prešově. [Google Scholar]
  11. Maccarone, Michele. 1976. Apostolicità, episcopato e primato di Pietro. Ricerche e testimonianze dal II al V secolo. Roma: Pontificia Università Lateranense. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mühlsteiger, Johannes. 2001. “Zum Verfassungsrecht der Frühkirche.” In Konrad Breitsching, and Wilhelm Rees. Tradition – Wegweisung in die Zukunft. Festschrift für Johannes Mühlsteiger zum 75. Geburtstag, 741-810. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. [Google Scholar]
  13. Müller, Ulrich B. 2014. “Frühchristliche Prophetie und die Johannesoffenbarung.” Novum Testamentum 56:174-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341464 [Google Scholar]
  14. Rossé, Gérard. 2010. Atti degli Apostoli. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Alba (Cuneo): Società San Paolo. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schnackenburg, Rudolf. 1963. Die Johannesbriefe. Leipzig: St. Benno-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sebott, Reinhold. 1993. Fundamentalkanonistik. Grund und Grenzen des Kirchenrechts. Frankfurt am Main: Knecht Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tanner, Norman P. 1990. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. Vol. I: Nicaea I to Lateran V. Shecd & Ward and Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Trilling, Wolfgang. 1975. Das wahre Israel. Studien zur Theologie des Matthäusevangeliums. Leipzig: St. Benno-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wrede, William. 1891. Untersuchungen zum Ersten Klemensbriefe. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.