Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

No. 3/2024 (2024)

Artykuły

Burden of Proof in the Sexual Harassment Cases in Georgia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/eppism.9268  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2024-11-04

Abstract

Sexual harassment presents a significant global challenge, including in Georgia. While some countries view sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination, others define it separately. This distinction is crucial in legal context, impacting court assessments
and case outcomes. The effectiveness of legal regulations addressing sexual harassment hinges on robust protection mechanism.
In Georgia, the Law on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination brings the burden of proof in line with international standards – requiring defendants to dispel doubts about the allegation of discriminatory actions. However, in practice, the courts here still
face difficult challenges, as the plaintiffs often bear the burden of proving that sexual harassment took place.

References

  1. Dewi M. D., Sexual Harassment in International Law, “International Journal of Social Service and Research” 2023, Vol. 3, 11. [Google Scholar]
  2. Krieger L. J., Fox C., Evidentiary Issues in Sexual Harassment Litigation, “Berkeley Women’s Journal” 1985, Vol. 1, 1. [Google Scholar]
  3. McGinley C. A., Reasonable Men?, “Connecticut Law Review” 2012, Vol. 45, 1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Piefer S. A., Sexual Harassment from the Victim’s Perspective: The need for the seventh circuit to adopt the reasonable woman standard, “Marquette Law Review” 1993, Vol. 77, 1. [Google Scholar]
  5. Radford M. F., By Invitation Only: The proof of welcomeness in sexual harassment cases, “North Carolina Law Review” 1994, Vol. 72, 3. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.