Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

No. 6 (2022)

Artykuły

Adapting electronic forms of employment to EU standards

  • Andrzej Marian Świątkowski
Published: 2024-02-04

Abstract

The author, analysing the attempts of EU institutions aimed at developing a uniform definition of the status of people employed on digital platforms, argues that as the law currently stands it is more justifiable to continue the practice of developing precedents in the case law of the CJEU, guaranteeing minimum standards of employment for the current non-employees and self-employed persons working within digital platforms.

References

  1. Bazzani Tania, L’Evolution de la Jurisprudance Espagnole sur la Qualification des Cursier Employé par le Platformes, „Revue de Droit compare du Travail et de la Sécurité sociale” 2021/1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bérastégui Pierre, Exposure to psychosocial risk factors in the gig economy: a systematic review, „European Trade Union Institute” (ETUI) Re- [Google Scholar]
  3. search Paper Series 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3770016 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brockmann Judith, Escande Varniol Marie-Cécelie, Nicod Cécile, Pérez del Prado Daniel, Legal feasibility of the ETUC proposal, 2021. Research project entitled Establishing workers representation and social dialogue in the platform and app economy, grant agreement VP/2018/006/0090 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bucher Eliane Léontine, Schou Peter Kalum, Waldkirch Matthias, Pacifying the algorithm – Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy, „Organization” 2021/1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards Richard, Contested terrain: The transformation of the work place in the twentieth century, London 1979 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerber Cristine, Krzywdzinski Martin, Brave new digital work? New forms of performance control in crowd work (w:) Work and Labour in Digital Age, red. S. Vallas, A. Kovalainen, „Research in Sociology of Work” 2019/33, s. 121, https://doi.org/101108/SO277-283320110000033008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Joys Stuart, Stuart Mark, Digitalized management. Control and resistans in platform (w:) Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism, Cheltenham–Northampton 2021 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kellogg Katherin, Vallentine Melisa, Christin Angèle, Algorithms at work: The new contested rerain of control, „Academy of Management Annals” 2021, https:/doi.org/10.5464/annals.2018.0174 [Google Scholar]
  10. Manthorpe Rowland, Coronavirus: Deliveroo riders say they can’t acess promised hardship fund, Sky news, https://news.skycom/story/coronavirus-deliveroo-riders-say-they-cant-access-promised-hardshio-fund-11959632/ (dostęp: 23.04.2022 r.) [Google Scholar]
  11. Ophir Yaakov, Sisso Itay, Asterhan Crista, Tikochinski Refael, Reichart Roi, The Turker blues: Hidden factors behind increased depression rates among Amazon’s Mechanical Turkes, „Clinical Psychological Science” 2020/1, s. 65, https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619885973 [Google Scholar]
  12. Precarious Work. The Challenge for Labour Law in Europe, red. J. Kenner, [Google Scholar]
  13. I. Florczak, M. Otto, Cheltham–Northampton 2019 [Google Scholar]
  14. Sans de Miguel Pablo, Falsos autónomos y falsos becarios: una aproximación institucional al caso español, „Cuadernos de relaciones laborales” 2019/1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sans de Miguel Pablo, Bazzani Tania, Arasans Juan, The definition of worker in the platform economy: Exploring workers’ risks and regulatory solutions, „Study for European Economic and Social Committee” Bruksela 2021, s. 92, QE-05-21-286-EN-N [Google Scholar]
  16. Schoukens Paul, Bario Alberto, The Changing concept of work: When does typical work become atypical?, „European Labour Law Journal” 2017/4 [Google Scholar]
  17. Stripping back the mast: Working conditions on digital platforms during the COVID-19 Pandemic, „International Labour Review”, https://www.eusc.europa.eu>q-05-21-286-en-n-0doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12222 [Google Scholar]
  18. Świątkowski Andrzej Marian, Autonomiczna definicja pracodawcy w europejskim prawie zabezpieczenia społecznego. Rozważania na tle wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE w sprawie AFMB, „Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne” 2021/3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Świątkowski Andrzej Marian, Autonomiczna definicja pracownika, „Monitor Prawa Pracy” 2014/11 [Google Scholar]
  20. Świątkowski Andrzej Marian, Dyrektywa 2019/1152 – przejrzyste i przewidywalne warunki pracy w Unii Europejskiej (część 1), „Europejski Przegląd Sądowy” 2020/4; (część 2), „Europejski Przegląd Sądowy” 2020/7 [Google Scholar]
  21. Świątkowski Andrzej Marian, Elektroniczne technologie zatrudnienia ery postindustrialnej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Ignatianum w Krakowie, Kraków 2019 [Google Scholar]
  22. Todoli-Signes Adrian, Cambios normativos en la digitalización del trabajo: Commentario de la “Ley Rider” y los derechos de información sobre los algoritmos, „IUSLabor. Revista d’anàlisi de Dret del Treball” 2021/2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Umar Muhammad, Xu Yan, Mirza Sultan Sikandar, The impact of Covid--19 on Gig economy, „Economic Research – Ekonomska Istrażivanja” 2020/1, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1862688 [Google Scholar]
  24. Urzi Brancati Cesira, Pesole Annarosa, Fernandez Matias Enrique, Digital Labour Platforms in Europe: Numbers, profiles and employment status of platform workers, Joint Research Centre, https://publications.jrc.europa.eu/repository.handl/JRC117330 (dostęp: 23.04.2022 r.) [Google Scholar]
  25. Urzi Brancati Cesira, Pesole Annarosa, Fernandez Matias Enrique, New evidence on platform workers in Europe: results from the second COOLLEM survey, Joint Research Centre, https://publications:jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC118570 (dostęp: 23.04.2022 r.) [Google Scholar]
  26. Veen Alex, Barrat Tom, Caleb Goods, Platform-capital’s “app-ettite” for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia, „Work, Employment and Society” 2020/3, https://doi. [Google Scholar]
  27. org/10.1177/0950017019836911 [Google Scholar]
  28. Waas Bernd, The Position of Workers in Collaborative Economy. A view on employment law (w:) European Employment: Current Challenges, [Google Scholar]
  29. red. R. Singer, T. Bazzani, Berlin 2017 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wood Alex, Martindale Nicholas, Lehdonvirta Vill, Dynamics of Contention in the Gig Economy: Rage Against the Platform, Customer, or State?, „New Technology, Work and Employment” 7.09.2021; https://semantic scholar (dostęp: 23.04.2022 r.) [Google Scholar]
  31. Wood Alex, Lehdonvirta Vill, Platform Precarity: Surviving Algorithmic Insecurity in the Gig Economy (9.09.2021), Oxford Internet Institute, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3795375 (dostęp: 23.04.2022 r.), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795375 [Google Scholar]
  32. Woodcock Jamie, The algorithmic panopticom at Deliveroo: Measurement, precarity, and the illusion of control, „Ephemera. Theory and Politics in Organization” 2020/3 [Google Scholar]

Most read articles by the same author(s)