Glosa (aprobująca) do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego  z 7.05.2019 r., sygn. akt V KK 180/18

Tomasz Łodziana

doi:10.54383/0031-0344.2024.06.9

No. 6 (2024)

Glosy

(Approving) commentary on judgment of the Supreme Court of 7 May 2019, V KK 180/18

Tomasz Łodziana

PDF (Język Polski)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54383/0031-0344.2024.06.9 [Google Scholar]
Published: 2024-07-12

Abstract

The subject of the commentary is the judgment of the Supreme Court relating to the basics of operational control management, including in the context of the aspect of information held (by the authorized body/person).

References

Kamil Rogoziński, Wiarygodne informacje o przestępstwie jako przesłanka zarządzenia zakupu kontrolowanego, „Prokuratura i Prawo”, nr 10/2010 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords

operational control
principle of subsidiarity
information
evidence

How to Cite

Łodziana, T. (2024). (Approving) commentary on judgment of the Supreme Court of 7 May 2019, V KK 180/18. Palestra, (6), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.54383/0031-0344.2024.06.9

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Tomasz Łodziana , Operational surveillance and the use of Pegasus system in Poland. A polemic , Palestra: No. 9 (2022)
Tomasz Łodziana, Comments on formal immunity of a prosecutor in the light of admissibility of initiating pre-trial proceedings and conducting a search , Palestra: No. 6 (2023)

Similar Articles

Tomasz Łodziana , Operational surveillance and the use of Pegasus system in Poland. A polemic , Palestra: No. 9 (2022)
Magdalena Matusiak-Frącczak, Surveillance and the use of the Pegasus system in Poland , Palestra: No. 7-8 (2022)
Robert Rynkun-Werner, Operational control without control – some reflections on the canvas to the decision of the Constitutional tribunal of 28 of Jule 2022 in the case SK 60/21 , Palestra: No. 4 (2023)
Monika Agnieszka Paulińska, European arrest warrant under the framework decision , Palestra: No. 4 (2023)
Ewa Plebanek, Some remarks concerning the obligation of preventive vaccination and penalizing violations of sanitary and anti-epidemic regulations , Palestra: No. 9 (2022)
Hanna Kuczyńska, Application of procedural law mechanisms to eliminate unwanted evidence from criminal trial , Palestra: No. 6 (2022)
Dominika Mróz-Krysta, Piotr Artur Olechowski, Jerzy Pisuliński, Review of the case law of the Polish Supreme Court in the area of civil law , Palestra: No. 5 (2022)
Przemysław Krawczyk, Probation period in the context of the principle of effective enforcement of penalties and compensation for wrong conviction, pre-trial detention or arrest , Palestra: No. 7 (2023)
Paweł Śmiałek, Roksana Gawrońska, Death of the applicant and the examination of a constitutional appeal in the light of the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 21 January 2020 (Ts 68/18) , Palestra: No. 6 (2023)
Józef Forystek, Amendments to the administrative nullity procedure and the issue of compensation for the unlawful acts of public authorities , Palestra: No. 5 (2022)

1 2 > >>

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

[1] Kamil Rogoziński, Wiarygodne informacje o przestępstwie jako przesłanka zarządzenia zakupu kontrolowanego, „Prokuratura i Prawo”, nr 10/2010 [Google Scholar]