The subject of this study is a problem concerning ineffectiveness of applicable penal law regulations protecting the freedom of religious worship i.e. Art.195 and Art.196 of the C.C. The author states that an existing protection model of these values is insufficient, and it is necessary and justified to make appropriate changes which should contribute to the increase of protection of this value. She suggests– in the form of de lege ferenda postulate–‘transferring’ some norms protecting the freedom of religious worship(guaranteed by Art. 195 C.C.) to the law of petty offences, where the rules of taking responsibility give an opportunity for more effective reaction to violation of this law by judiciary authorities. She also emphasizes that in the law of petty offences it is possible to apply different reactionary measures than punishments e.g. the application of social or educational impact measures and it is possible to submit the case to proceedings by police penal orders, which gives a chance of effective reaction to violation of particular values. The author also suggests covering with legal protection different forms of worshipping than public(private worship).
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.