Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Journals name baner

No. 1(03) (2015)

Artykuły

Friends-and-Neighbors Voting”: Contribution to Research in the Polish Context

Published: 2015-06-30

Abstract

“Friends-and-neighbors voting”, that is, the tendency of voters to support local candidates (even in national elections) is a phenomenon known from a number of democracies. In this short article I focus on three constituencies to analyze it in the context of the Polish Senate election held in 2011. These analyses demonstrate a strong effect of “localness” of the candidates, despite the fact that the election was held in single-member districts, a system theoretically unfavorable to “friends-and-neighbors voting”. At the same time, the above effect is much less pronounced in case of the candidates running on behalf of the two largest political parties. This suggests that some more general aspects of party competition at the national level may contribute to the suppression of the effect of the candidates’ personal traits, including their local roots, on their electoral success.

References

  1. Arter D. (2011), The Michael Marsh question: How do Finns do constituency service?, „Parliamentary Affairs”, 64(1), 129–152. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arzheimer K., & Evans J. (2012), Geolocation and voting: Candidate-voter distance effects on party choice in the 2010 UK general election in England, „Political Geography”, 31(5), 301–310. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arzheimer K., & Evans J. (2014), Candidate geolocation and voter choice in the 2013 English County Council elections, „Research & Politics”, 1(2), 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blais A., Gidengil E., Dobrzynska A., Nevitte N., & Adeau R. (2003), Does the local candidate matter? Candidate effects in the Canadian election of 2000, „Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique”, 36(03), 657–664. [Google Scholar]
  5. Butler D., & Stokes D. (1969), Political change in Britain: Forces shaping electoral choice, London: Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell R., & Cowley P. (2014), What voters want: reactions to candidate characteristics in a survey experiment, „Political Studies, 62(4), 745–765. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunningham R. (1971), The Impact of the Local Candidate in Canadian Federal Elections, „Canadian Journal of Political Science”, 4(02), 287–290. [Google Scholar]
  8. Flis J. (2014), Złudzenia wyboru, Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gimpel J.G., Karnes K.A., McTague J., & Pearson-Merkowitz S. (2008), Distance-decay in the political geography of friends-and-neighbors voting, „Political Geography”, 27(2), 231–252. [Google Scholar]
  10. Górecki M.A., & Marsh M. (2012), Not just ‘friends and neighbours’: canvassing, geographic proximity and voter choice, „European Journal of Political Research”, 51(5), 563–582. [Google Scholar]
  11. Górecki M.A., & Marsh M. (2014), A decline of ‘friends and neighbours’ voting in Ireland? Local candidate effects in the 2011 Irish ‘earthquake election’. „Political Geography”, 41, 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hazan R.Y. (1999), Constituency interests without constituencies:: the geographical impact of candidate selection on party organization and legislative behavior in the 14th Israeli Knesset, 1996–1999, „Political Geography”, 18(7), 791–811. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hessels M. (2013), Nationwide localism, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Johnson N.C. (1989), An analysis of the ‘friends and neighbours’ effect in an Irish urban constituency, „Irish Geography”, 22(2), 93–105. [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnston R.J. (1972), Spatial elements in voting patterns at the 1968 Christchurch City Council election, „Political Science”, 24(1), 49–61. Johnston R., Jones K., Sarker R., Propper C., Burgess S., & Bolster A. (2004), Party support and the neighbourhood effect: spatial polarisation of the British electorate, 1991–2001, „Political Geography”, 23(4), 367–402. [Google Scholar]
  15. Key V.O. (1949), Southern politics in state and nation, New York: Knopf. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kjar S.A., & Laband D.N. (2002), On Home Grown-ness’ in Politics: Evidence from the 1998 Election for Alabama’s Third Congressional District, „Public Choice”, 112(1–2), 143–150. [Google Scholar]
  17. McCarty H.H. (1954), McCarty on McCarthy: The Spatial Distribution of the McCarthy Vote 1952, Department of Geography, University of Iowa. [Google Scholar]
  18. Meredith M. (2013), Exploiting friends-and-neighbors to estimate coattail effects, „American Political Science Review”, 107(04), 742–765. [Google Scholar]
  19. Parker A.J. (1982), The ‘friends and neighbours’ voting effect in the Galway West constituency, „Political Geography Quarterly”, 1(3), 243–262. [Google Scholar]
  20. Parker A.J. (1984), An ecological analysis of voting patterns in Galway West, 1977, „Irish Geography”, 17(1), 42–64. [Google Scholar]
  21. Parker A.J. (1986), Geography and the Irish Electoral System: The Presidential Address of 1984–1985, „Irish Geography”, 19(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rabe-Hesketh S., & Skrondal A. (2005), Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata, College Station: STATA Press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rice T.W., & Macht A.A. (1987), The hometown advantage: Mobilization or conversion?, „Political Behavior”, 9(3), 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  24. Richardson B.M. (1988), Constituency candidates versus parties in Japanese voting behavior, „American Political Science Review”, 82(03), 695–718. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sacks P.M. (1976), The Donegal Mafia: An Irish Political Machine, New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tatalovich R. (1975), ‘Friends and Neighbors’ Voting: Mississippi, 1943–1973, „The Journal of Politics”, 37(03), 807–814. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.