Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Journals name baner

Nr 2(19) (2023)

Artykuły

Polityka ekonomiczna jako przedmiot konfliktu – perspektywa psychologiczna

  • Janusz Reykowski
Opublikowane: 2023-12-30

Abstrakt

The text discusses the theoretical and political conflict between laissez-faire and interventionism in economic policy. The dispute centers on which policy fosters economic development and which hinders it, as well as on the socially desirable nature of these policies. The argumentation in this dispute refers to certain facts, with participants asserting that their radical free-market stance are objective economic truths. The paper argues that the theoretical conflict engages psychological and ideological justifications, tying radical individualism to neoliberal market ideology, a prosocial, humanistic individualism to left-democratic economic policy, and nativist collectivism to a welfare state ideology. Despite these ideological conflicts, the author hints at integrative strategies, identifying positive aspects in each position for effective application. Additionally, the article explores two mentalities – collectivist and individualist – tracing their historical development and contemporary manifestations.

Bibliografia

  1. Balcerowicz Leszek (2012), Odkrywając wolność. Przeciw zniewoleniu umysłów, wybór tekstów, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bar-Tal Daniel (2013), Intractable conflicts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baumeister Roy F. (red.) (1999), The Self in Social Psychology, Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
  4. Feldman Stanley, Steenbergen Marco R. (2001), The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare, „American Journal of Political Science”, 45 (3), s. 658–677. [Google Scholar]
  5. Inglehart Ronald, Welzel Christian (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jost John T. (2017), Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology, „Political Psychology”, 38, s. 167–208. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kołodko Grzegorz W. (2013), Dokąd zmierza świat-ekonomia polityczna przyszłości, Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka. [Google Scholar]
  8. Krys Kuba, Park Joonha, Kocimska-Zych Agata, Kosiarczyk Aleksandra, Selim Heyla A., Wojtczuk-Turek Agnieszka (2021), Personal Life Satisfaction as a Measure of Societal Happiness is an [Google Scholar]
  9. Individualistic Presumption: Evidence from Fifty Countries, „Journal of Happiness Studies”, 22, s. 2197–2214. [Google Scholar]
  10. Latham Robert (2001), Liberalism and war, w: Neil J. Smelser, Paul B. Baltes (red.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier, s. 8787–8792. [Google Scholar]
  11. Markus Hazel R., Conner Alana (2013), Clash!: 8 cultural conflicts that make us who we are, New York: Hudson Street Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. McFarland Sam, Hackett Justin, Hamer Katarzyna, Katzarska-Miller Iva, Malsch Anna, Reese Gerhard, Reysen Stephen (2019), Global Human Identification and Citizenship: A Review of Psychological Studies, „Political Psychology”, 40, s. 141–171. [Google Scholar]
  13. Radkiewicz Piotr (2019), Patriotyzm, etnocentryzm, nacjonalizm: perspektywa makropsychologiczna, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rand Ayn (2020), Textbook of Americanism 2.0., „Journal of Ayn Rand Studies”, 20 (1). [Google Scholar]
  15. Triandis Harry C. (1994), Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Study of Collectivismand Individualism, w: Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Çiğdem Kâğitçibaşi, Sang-Chin Choi, [Google Scholar]
  16. Gene Yoon (red.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, s. 41–51. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.