Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Journals name baner

Nr 1(14) (2021)

Artykuły

The US 2020 Election and Learning from History

Opublikowane: 2021-06-30

Abstrakt

The US 2020 presidential election constitutes an anomaly for the general paradigm of learning from history that organizes cross-national research in politics. Was it a unique event that can be ignored or must we consider that history is no longer a reliable guide?

Bibliografia

  1. Alvarez Michael, Cheibub Jose Antonio, Limongi Fernando, Przeworski Adam (1996), Classifying Political Regimes, „Comparative Studies in International Development”, 31, p. 3–36. [Google Scholar]
  2. Benhabib Jess, Przeworski Adam (2006), The political economy of redistribution under democracy, „Economic Theory”, 29, p. 271–290. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen M. Keith, Rohla Ryne (2018), The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties, „Science”, 360 (June 1), p. 1020–1024. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dalton Russell J. (2008), The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems Party Sysem Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences, „Comparative Political Studies”, 41, p. 889–920. [Google Scholar]
  5. Drutman Lee (2021), Why the two-party system is effing up U.S. democracy, 538, June 16. [Google Scholar]
  6. Esteban Joan-Marfa, Debraj Ray (1994), On the Measurement of Polarization, „Econometrica”, 62, p. 819–851. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ginsburg Tom, Huq Aziz Z., (2018), How to lose a constitutional democracy, „UCLA Law Review”, 65 (1), p. 78–169. [Google Scholar]
  8. Inglehart Roman (2018), Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World, New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Iyengar Shanto, Krupenkin Masha (2018), The Strengthening of Partisan Affect, „Advances in Political Psychology”, 39, Suppl. 1, p. 201–218. [Google Scholar]
  10. King Gary, Zheng Langche (2007), When Can History be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference, „International Studies Quarterly”, 51, p. 183–210. [Google Scholar]
  11. Levitsky Steve, Way Lucan A. (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War, New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewandowsky Stephan, Ecker Ullrich K.H., Cook John (2017), Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the „Post-Truth” Era, „Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition”, 6, p. 353–369. [Google Scholar]
  13. Magaloni Beatrice (2017), Thought piece on how democracies fail. Prepared for the conference „How do Democracies Fall Apart (And could it happen here)?” held at Yale University, October 6, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Medina Lucfa (2015), Partisan supply and voters’ positioning on the left-right scale in Europe, „Party Politics”, 21, p. 775–790. [Google Scholar]
  15. Moral Mert, Best Roben E. (2018), On the Reciprocal Relationship between Party Polarization and Citizen Polarization. Paper presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  16. Przeworski Adam (2015), Acquiring the Habit of Changing Governments through Elections, „Comparative Political Studies”, 48, pages: 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  17. Przeworski Adam (2019), Crises of Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Przeworski Adam, Limongi Fernando (1997), Modernization: Theories and Facts, „World Politics”, 49, p. 155–183. [Google Scholar]
  19. Przeworski Adam, Rivero Gonzalo, Xi Tianyang (2015), Elections as a method of processing [Google Scholar]
  20. conflicts, „European Journal of Political Economy”, 39, p. 235–243. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.