Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Journals name baner

Nr 1(12) (2020)

Artykuły

Populizm jako forma przywództwa politycznego: trzy tradycje teoretyczne i perspektywy badawcze

Opublikowane: 2020-06-26

Abstrakt

In a contemporary political sociology, experiencing a renaissance in political leadership studies, the populism – defined as a specific type of anti-establishment leadership – is quite well known not only from current „rises”, but also from former cyclic „tidal waves”. Even if there are visible parallels to former waves of populist politics, few socio-political analyses of the current „third wave” sweeping across Europe and the US benefit from the theoretical body of researches of previous waves. The current approach focuses on a shallow theoretical-historical approach to populism as a sui generis novum, as a critical backlash to contemporary development trends (ie. globalism, centralized government, neo-liberal politics, etc.). Thus this paper aims at reminding three important analyses relating to three consecutive waves of populism. All three point at populism as a manifestation of democratic trends and focus attention on leadership groups. Alexis de Tocqueville viewed populist campaigns of Louis Napoleon in France as manifestations of a „despotic democracy”. Max Weber judged European populisms he witnessed as manifestations of a „plebiscitary democracy”. Contemporary neo- elitists focus their attention both on leaders and on the structure of leadership groups as well as on relations between leaders and their „electorate”. Such leadershipfocused perspective is a necessary addendum to the research on contemporary populism.

Bibliografia

  1. Best Heinrich, Higley John (red.) (2010), Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives, Leiden–Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
  2. Best Heinrich, Higley John (red.) (2018), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites, London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  3. Canovan Margaret (1981), Populism, New York: Harcourt. [Google Scholar]
  4. Canovan Margaret (2004), Populism for political theorists? „Journal of Political Ideologies”, vol. 9 (3), s. 241–252. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dahl Robert (1971), Polyarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Femia Joseph V., Marshall Alasdair J. (2012), Vilfredo Pareto. Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, Farnham: Ashgate. [Google Scholar]
  7. Field G. Lowell, Higley John (1980), Elitism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, re-issued by Routledge in 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fieschi Catherine (2019), Populocracy, Newcastle: Agenda Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fukuyama Francis (2014), Political Order and Political Decay, New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fukuyama Francis (2018), The Populist Surge, https://www.the-american-interest.com/2018/ the-populist-surge (dostęp 20.01.2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerbaudo Paolo (2014), The Mask and the Flag, London: Hurst. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hartliński Maciej (2012), Przywództwo polityczne – wprowadzenie, Olsztyn: Instytut Nauk Politycznych UWM. [Google Scholar]
  13. Higley John (2016), The Endangered West. Myopic Elites and Fragile Social Orders in a Threatening World, London: Routledge, originally Transaction Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  14. Higley John, Burton Michael (2006), Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy, Lanham, MD: [Google Scholar]
  15. Rowman & Littlefield. Higley John, Kullberg Judith, Pakulski Jan (1996), The Persistence of Postcommunist Elites, „Journal of Democracy”, vol. 7 (2), s. 133–147. [Google Scholar]
  16. Higley John, Pakulski Jan (2007), Elite and Leadership Change in Liberal Democracies, „Comparative Sociology”, vol. 6, 1–2, s. 6–26. [Google Scholar]
  17. Higley John, Pakulski Jan (2011a), Do Ruling Elites Degenerate: American and British Elites Through Pareto’s Lens, „International Journal of Comparative Sociology”, vol. 10, s. 949–967. [Google Scholar]
  18. Higley John, Pakulski Jan (2011b), Elite Degeneration and Power Change, w: John Uhr, Paul t’Hart (red.), How Power Changes Hands, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  19. Higley John, Pakulski Jan (2020), Leaders and Elites in Populist Surges, referat jeszcze nie publikowany, School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hobsbawm Eric (1994), The Age of Extremes, London: Abacus. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ibrahim Vivian, Wunsch Margit (2012), Political Leadership, Nations and Charisma, New York–Abingdon: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ionescu Ghita, Gellner Ernest (red.) (1969), Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kane John, Patapan Haig (2012), The Democratic Leader, Oxford: OUP. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kane John, Patapan Haig, t’Hart Paul (2009), Dispersed Democratic Leadership, Oxford: OUP. [Google Scholar]
  25. Knoke David (2018), Power Networks, w: Heinrich Best, John Higley (red.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites, London: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 539–563. [Google Scholar]
  26. Körösenyi András (2019), The Theory and Practice of Plebiscitary Leadership: Weber and the Orban Regime, „East European Politics and Society”, vol. 33 (2), s. 280–301. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kramnick Isaac (2003), Introduction and Notes to Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America and Two Essays on America, London: Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lengyel György and Ilonszki Gabriella (2016), The Illiberal Turn in Hungary: Institutions and Leadership, w: Jan Pakulski (red.), The Visegrad Countries in Crisis, Warsaw: Collegium Civitas, s. 27–45. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mudde Cas (2015), Populism in Europe: a Primer, Open Democracy website, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/populism-in-europe-primer/ (dostęp 27.08.2020). [Google Scholar]
  30. Mudde Cas (2018), Populism in the Twenty-First Century: An Illiberal Response to Undemocratic Liberalism, https://www.sas.upenn.edu/andrea -mitchell-center/cas-mudde-populismtwenty-first-century. (dostęp 3.04.2019). [Google Scholar]
  31. Müller Jan-Werner (2016), What is Populism? Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Norris Pippa, Inglehart Ronald (2019), Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pakulski Jan (2012), The Weberian Foundations of Modern Elite Theory and Democratic Politics, „Historical Social Research”, issue on „Elite foundations of social theory and politics”, vol. 37 (1), s. 42–63. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pakulski Jan (2016a), Crumbling Elite Consensus and the Illiberal Turn in Poland, w: Jan Pakulski (red.), The Visegrad Countries in Crisis, Warsaw: Collegium Civitas, s. 6–26. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pakulski Jan (2016b), Ruchy populistyczne i degeneracja elit przywódczych – analiza Weberowska, „Zoon Politicon”, 7, s. 57–74. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pakulski Jan (2018), Classical Elite Theory: Pareto and Weber, w: Heinrich Best, John Higley (red.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites, London: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pakulski Jan, Higley John (2008), Towards Leader Democracy? w: Paul t’Hart, John Uhr (red.), Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices, Canberra: ANU Press (E), s. 45–54, [Google Scholar]
  38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24h3bh.8?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. Pakulski Jan, Körösenyi András (2012), Toward Leader Democracy, London–New York: Anthem Press. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pakulski Jan, Wasilewski Jacek (2006), Cyrkulacja elit politycznych: od lisów do lwów, „Studia Socjologiczne”, vol. 181 (2), s. 126–141. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pareto Vilfredo (1935), The Mind and Society. A Treatise on General Sociology, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. [Google Scholar]
  41. Putnam Robert D. (1976), The Comparative Study of Political Elites, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schumpeter Joseph (1943), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy New York: Harper. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tocqueville Alexis de (1840/2003), Democracy in America and Two Essays on America, translated by G. Bevan, London: Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tocqueville Alexis de (1856/1952), De Tocqueville’s L’Ancien Regime, translated by M.W. Patterson, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  45. Weber Max, Economy and Society (1978), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  46. Woodward Bob (2018), Fear: Trump in the White House, New York: Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.