Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020)

Articles

The Victims and the Sufficiency of their Rights in the Criminal Justice System

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2020.13.2-11  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2020-12-31

Abstract

The question of victims’ rights in the criminal proceedings is one of the most discussed question in the sphere of criminal law in the recent years. According to Howard Zehr the restorative justice system is a system that look in a special way on crime, offender and victim. In this connection it should be also said that also Catholic church encourages models of restorative justice that seek to address crime in terms of the harm done to victims and community, not simply as a violation of law. Based on the key idea of restorative justice formulated by Howard Zehr, according to whom restorative justice is primarily a means of addressing the needs of victims of crime, it is undoubtedly possible to assume the central role of the victim within the restorative concept of criminal justice.

References

  1. Cardenas, Juan. 1986. “The crime victim in the prosecutorial process.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 9:359–71. [Google Scholar]
  2. Daly, Kathleen. 2007. “The limits of restorative justice.” In Handbook of restorative justice, ed. Dennis Sullivan, and Larry Tifft, 134–45. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  3. Herman, Susan. 2004. “Is Restorative Justice Possible Without a Parallel System for Victims?” In Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, ed. Howard Zehr, and Barb Toews, 75–83. Monsey, New York and Cullompton, Devon, UK: Criminal Justice Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnstone, Gerry, and Daniel W. van Ness. 2013. “The meaning of restorative justice.” In A restorative justice reader, ed. Gerry Johnstone, 17. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843926191 [Google Scholar]
  5. Klátik, Jaroslav. 2008. “Koncepcia restoratívneho trestania a systém alternatívneho riešenia trestných vecí v Slovenskej republike.” Justičná revue 60, no. 1:77–85. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liebman, Marian. 2012. Restorative justice – how it works. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  7. Strang, Heather. 2004. “Is Restorative Justice Imposing Its Agenda on Victims?” In Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, ed. Howard Zehr, and Barb Toews, 95–106. Monsey, New York and Cullompton, Devon, UK: Criminal Justice Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Walker, Lorenn. 2013. “Restorative Justice for Victims Without Offenders Participation.” In Restorative Justice Today – practical applications, ed. Katherine S. van Wormer, and Lorenn Walker, 33–42. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452244228.n5 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.