Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Nr 1/77 (2022)

Artykuły

Propositions of benefits for persons providing care for family members employed in agriculture in Germany – significance, legal basis, and further development

  • Erich Koch
Opublikowane: 28.06.2022

Abstrakt

The share of elderly people in the European population is constantly increasing, which also increases the number of people in constant need of care. In order to meet this challenge, Germany has decided to take action in the field of social security law. For decades – as compulsory social insurance – there has been a separate social care insurance system, which includes, among other things, regulations for the benefit of family members providing care. Even though small in quantitative terms, an increasingly significant part of these statutory provisions is aimed at reducing the psychological, physical, and economic loads on care providers. One of such provisions results from social insurance in terms of the Social Security Institution for Agriculture, Forestry, and Horticulture (German: Sozialversicherung für Landwirtschaft, Forsten und Gartenbau, SVLFG), which offers insured persons solutions that take into account their specific needs. In recent years, the offered solutions have been subject to evaluation and development, and recently – due to the coronavirus pandemic – also modification. This was justified by the fact that in the ecological sector (agriculture, forestry, horticulture, as well as areas related to those sectors of the economy where there is an obligation for agricultural social insurance), home care is much more common than in other sectors. Avoiding physical and mental overloads can also be described as a postulate aimed at undertaking extensive preventive measures in the area of agricultural social insurance. Even though the offered solutions serve an exemplary role and are highly appreciated, they are used by a relatively small number of authorised persons. So far, there is no more detailed information concerning the highly unsatisfactory number of people taking advantage of these solutions. Therefore, there is a need for examining the reasons for the existing situation in a deeper manner.
The article aims to present a special offer of the entity responsible for agricultural social insurance in Germany, aimed at relieving the members of families providing care and including them in health care in the full scope of social care insurance. In order to present the possibilities for further development, legal regulations and practical issues will be presented and evaluated, as well as the obtained results and the existing limitations.
The subject of the discussion will be presented in the form of a descriptive presentation, mainly from a legal and empirical perspective and by comparing it with reference systems present in Germany, taking into account research results obtained in Germany and abroad.

Bibliografia

  1. Angele S., Calero C., Stärkung präventiver Potenziale in der Pflegeberatung, Bundesgesundheitsblatt 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Basche J., Die Zukunft der Pflege, RDG 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Edwards V. et al., Characteristics and Health Status of Informal Unpaid Caregivers – 44 States, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2015–2017, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), February 21, 2020/69(7), https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6907a2-H.pdf, access 5.02.2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. Heger D., Work and Well-Being of Informal Caregivers in Europe, Ruhr Economic Papers #512, https://www.rwi-essen.de/media/content/pages/publikationen/ruhr-economic-papers/REP_14_512.pdf, access 5.02.2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hetzel C. et al., Effekt eines einwöchigen Gesundheitsprogramms auf die psychische Gesundheit von pflegenden Eltern – eine kontrollierte Panelstudie, Das Gesundheitswesen, 2021, Online, https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1386–4029, access 5.02.2022. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hetzel C. et al., Konzept eines einwöchigen Gesundheitsprogramms für pflegende Angehörige gemeinsam mit ihrer pflegebedürftigen Person – “Pflegetandem”, Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung, 2020, Online, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553–020–00821-w, access 5.02.2022. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hetzel C., Häusliche Pflege im grünen Sektor – Daten der Pflegestatistik, SdL 2020, Nr. 25. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hetzel C., Personen in belastenden Situationen (PibS): Evaluation der Trainings- und Erholungswoche für pflegende Angehörige, Auftraggeber: Land- und forstwirtschaftliche Sozialversicherung Hessen, Rheinland-Pfalz und Saarland und der Sozialversicherung für den Gartenbau, Cologne 2011. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hetzel C., Personen in belastenden Situationen (PibS): Evaluation der Trainings- und Erholungswoche für pflegende Angehörige, Auftraggeber: Land- und forstwirtschaftliche Sozialversicherung Niederbayern/Oberpfalz und Schwaben, Cologne 2010. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hetzel C., Evaluation des SVLFG-Gesundheitsangebots “Trainings- und Erholungswoche für pflegende Angehörige”, SdL 2016. [Google Scholar]
  11. Holzer M., Gesundheitsangebote der SVLFG, ASUMed 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. Janda C., Die Entlastung von Angehörigen in der Pflege, VSSAR 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Koch E., The German social security system for farmers, “Ubezpieczenia w Rolnictwie – Materiały i Studia” 2020, nr 2(74). [Google Scholar]
  14. Köhler K.F., Rentenversicherungspflicht und Unfallversicherungsschutz der häuslichen Pflegekraft unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rechtslage in der Landwirtschaft, AUR 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kropp F., Zündel M., Caspari F., Evaluationsbericht Digitale Schulungsangebote für pflegende Angehörige, 2017, https://toechtersoehne.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Evaluationsbericht-Teil-1-Digitale-Schulungsangebote-fu%CC%88r-pflegende-Angeho%CC%88rige.pdf, access 5.02.2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. Richter A.S., Zur Situation pflegender und betreuender Angehöriger in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, NDV 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun X. et al., The influence of social support, care burden, and depression on quality of life among caregivers of patients with severe mental illness: a cross-sectional survey in rural areas of Sichuan, China, “The Lancet”, Vol. 394. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tur-Sinai A. et al., How Many Older Informal Caregivers Are There in Europe? Comparison of Estimates of Their Prevalence from Three European Surveys, “International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health” 2020, Vol. 17, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249531, access 5.02.2022. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolf I., Psychologische Online-Beratung für pflegende Angehörige – das Internetportal pflegen-und-leben.de, “Archiv für Wissenschaft und Praxis der sozialen Arbeit” 2021, Nr. 1 [Google Scholar]
  20. World Health Organization, Integrated care for older people (ICOPE), Guidelines on community-level interventions to manage declines in intrinsic capacity, https://www.who.int/ageing/health-systems/icope/evidence-centre/ICOPE-evidence-profile-caregiver.pdf?ua=1, access 5.02.2022. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zigante V., Informal care in Europe – Exploring Formalisation, Availability, and Quality, file://lsv.de/dfs/usr/hdir/u402028/Benutzerdaten/Downloads/KE-04–18–543-EN-N.pdf, access 5.02.2022. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.