Public procurement, as the engine of a developing society, requires a series of jurisdictional procedures. These procedures are not just theoretical but have practical implications, guaranteeing compliance with the principles and rules of conducting the admin-
istrative procedures for awarding contracts and their development in accordance with the legal provisions. Romania has transposed Directive no. 665/89, making a distinction between the jurisdictional procedures in which the documents drawn up in the phase prior to the conclusion of the contract, directly related to the administrative award procedure and those aimed at the execution of contracts, their nullity, resolution, termination, which can be completed after the completion of the award procedure during the contract. Regardless of the situation, however, Romanian law gives concrete effects to the principle of celerity, which it protects through express rules that enshrine short terms for the procedure, for formulating some documents, for attacking the decision, although sometimes the same procedural provisions seem to affect this principle. The paper aims to present these provisions, interpreted especially in the light of celerity and the requirements of the supranational regulation, which are imposed in the internal procedures, including through the jurisprudence of the Court of Luxemburg.
Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.
