Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne

Vol. 31 No. 1 (2022)

Artykuły

The process of the emergence of the biblical canon in the light of the Qumran manuscripts

  • Michał Klukowski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/lst.2022.1.23-31  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2022-04-07

Abstract

The article deals with the emergence of the biblical canon in the light of the Qumran manuscripts. In the first part of the article, the author explains the terminology of the literature on the subject. In the second part, it presents the criteria on the basis of which a given book is considered authoritative. In the third part, it presents the issues of data interpretation based on these criteria.

References

  1. Beckwith R.T., “The Significance of the 364-Day Calendar for the Old Testament Canon”, Calendar, Chronology and Worship, red. R.T. Beckwith; Leiden: Brill 2005, 54–66. [Google Scholar]
  2. Berthelot K., “4QMMT et la question du canon de la Bible hébraïque”, From 4QMMT to Resurrection. Mélanges qumrâniens en hommage à Émile Puech, red. F. García Martínez, A. Steudel, E.J.C. Tigchelaar; STDJ 61, Leiden: Brill 2006, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  3. –––, “Authoritative Scriptures: Torah and Related Texts”, T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark 2019, 264‒268. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooke G.J., “The Explicit Presentation of Scripture in 4QMMT”, Legal Texts and Legal Issues; Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies, Cambridge 1995. Published in Honour of Joseph M. Baumgarten, red. J. Kampen, M.J. Bernstein, F. García Martínez, STDJ 23, Leiden: Brill 1997, 67‒88. [Google Scholar]
  5. –––, “Between Authority and Canon: The Significance of Reworking the Bible for Understanding the Canonical Process”, Reworking the Bible. Apocryphal and Related Texts at Qumran. Proceedings of a Joint Symposium by the Orion Center for the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Associated Literature and the Hebrew University Institute for Advanced Studies Research Group on Qumran, 15–17 January, 2002, red. E.G. Chazon, D. Dimant, R. Clements; STDJ 58, Leiden: Brill 2005, 85‒104. [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell J.G., “4QMMTd and the Tripartite Canon”, Journal of Jewish Studies 51 (2000) 181–190. [Google Scholar]
  7. Coblentz Bautch K., Weinbender J., “Authoritative Scriptures: Other Texts”, T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark 2019, 280‒285. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahmen U., “Authoritative Scriptures: Writings and Related Texts”, T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark 2019, 273‒279. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dempster S.G., “Torah, Torah, Torah. The Emergence of the Tripartite Canon”, Exploring the Origins of the Bible: Canon Formation in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective, red. C.A. Evans, [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Tov, Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic 2008, 87‒127. [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans C.A., “The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Canon of Scripture in the Time of Jesus”, The Bible at Qumran: Text, Shape and Interpretation, red. P.W. Flint, SDSSRL, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2001, 67–79. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lim T.H., “The Alleged Reference to the Tripartite Division of the Hebrew Bible”, Revue de Qumrân 20/1 (2001) 23–37. [Google Scholar]
  13. –––, “Authoritative Scriptures and The Dead Sea Scrolls”, The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. J.J. Collins, T.H. Lim, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 303‒322. [Google Scholar]
  14. McDonald M.L, Kanon Biblii. Źródła, przekaz, znaczenie, Prymasowska Seria Biblijna; Warszawa: Vocatio 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. Najman H., Seconding Sinai: The Development of Mosaic Discourses in Second Temple Judaism, SJSJ 77; Leiden: Brill 2003). [Google Scholar]
  16. Pajunen M., “Bible,” T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark, 2019, 369‒377. [Google Scholar]
  17. Puech É., “Quelques observations sur le ‛canon’ des ‛Écrits’,” Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism, red. M. Popović; JSJSup 141, Leiden: Brill 2010, 227‒251. [Google Scholar]
  18. Qimron E., Strugnell J., Qumran Cave 4.V: Miqsat Maʿaśe ha-Torah, DJD X; Oxford: Clarendon 1994. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanecki A., Kanon biblijny w perspektywie historycznej, teologicznej i egzegetycznej, Kraków: Dehon, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  20. Szymik S., “Qumran a Kanon Biblii Hebrajskiej,” Qumran. Pomiędzy Starym a Nowym Testamentem, red. H. Drawnel, A. Piwowar, ABL 2, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL 2009, 77‒91. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tronina A., Biblia w Qumran. Wprowadzenie w lekturę rękopisów znad Morza Martwego, Biblioteka Zwojów. Tło Nowego Testamentu 8, Kraków: The Enigma Press 2001. [Google Scholar]
  22. –––, Komentarze Biblijne z Qumran. Od midraszu do peszeru, Teksty z Pustyni Judzkiej 6, Kraków‒Mogilany: The Enigma Press, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ulrich E., “The Non-attestation of a Tripartite Canon in 4QMMT,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 65 (2003) 202–214. [Google Scholar]
  24. –––, “The Jewish Scriptures: Texts, Versions, Canons,” The Eerdmans Dictionary of Early Judaism, red. J.J. Collins, D.C. Harlow, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2010, 97‒119. [Google Scholar]
  25. ––– “Scriptures at Qumran and the Road Toward Canon,” The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Developmental Composition of the Bible, VTSup 169, Leiden: Brill 2015) 299‒308. [Google Scholar]
  26. VanderKam J.C., “Revealed Literature in the Second Temple Period”, From Revelation to Canon: Studies in Hebrew Bible and Second Temple Literature, red. J.C. VanderKam, JSJSup 62, Leiden: Brill 2000, 1‒30. [Google Scholar]
  27. –––, “Questions of Canon Viewed through the Dead Sea Scrolls”, The Canon Debate, red. L.M. McDonald, J.A. Sanders, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002, 91‒109. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vielhauer R., “Authoritative Scriptures: Prophets and Related Texts”, T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark, 2019, 269‒272. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.