Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023)

Articles

Digital Transformation and Its Social and Administrative-Legal Implications. From Homo Sapiens to Homo Digitalis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.8105  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-12-29

Abstract

The ongoing digital transformation that we are experiencing as humanity requires in-depth analysis at many levels of research. In the field of law and administrative procedure, the issue of automated administrative decision-making in individual cases is of particular importance. That is, the making and issuing of decisions in the process of applying the law. Against this background, a number of concerns and questions arise, not only of a legal nature, but also of a social nature, related to the perception of the human being in an intensely digitally changing reality. As can be surmised, never before in the development of administrative law has the consideration of ethical issues in the context of administrative procedure been so frequently addressed. One of the fundamental questions is whether this act of applying the law, hitherto performed by a human being, can be performed by a device/algorithm?

References

  1. Bathaee, Yavar. 2018. “Introduction. The artificial intelligence black box and the failure of intent and causation.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 31, no. 2:890-96. [Google Scholar]
  2. Campo, Enrico. 2022. Attention and its Crisis in Digital Society. https://www.routledge.com/Attention-and-its-Crisis-in-Digital-Society/Campo/p/book/9781032126401# [accessed: 03.04.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  3. Coglianese, Cary, and David Lehr. 2017. “Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era.” https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1734/ [accessed: 03.04.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Etscheid, Ian. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration, in Electronic Government.” Springer LNCS 11685. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_19 [accessed: 26.11.2022]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaim, Karolina. 2020. “Sztuczna inteligencja właścicielem praw do utworu bądź wynalazku?” https://www.parp.gov.pl/component/content/article/63599:sztuczna-inteligencja-wlascicielem-praw-do-utworu-badz-wynalazku [accessed: 06.04.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mökander, Jacob, Jessica Morley, Mariarosaria Taddeo, et al. 2021. “Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature, Scope, and Limitations.” https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-021-00319-4 [accessed: 10.02.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  7. Oksanowicz, Paweł, and Aleksandra Przegalińska. 2023. Sztuczna inteligencja. Nieludzka, arcyludzka, https://books.google.pl/books?id=f73TDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT34&hl=pl&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false [accessed: 10.02.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  8. Piecha, Jacek. 2021. “Zastosowanie algorytmów sztucznej inteligencji a kontrola administracji publicznej.” In Maksymilian Cherka, Piotr Gołaszewski, Jacek Piecha, et al., Kryzys, stagnacja, renesans? Prawo administracyjne przyszłości. Księga Jubileuszowa profesora Jacka Jagielskiego, 786-87. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]
  9. Skrabacz, Aleksandra, and Monika Lewińska-Krzak. 2022. “Wpływ rewolucji cyfrowej na rozwój społeczeństwa informacyjnego oraz społeczną wartość informacji.” Roczniki Nauk Społecznych XIV, no. 1:119-36. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tischner, Józef. 1982. “Etyka wartości nadziei.” In Wobec wartości, edited by Dietrich von Hildebrand, Jan Kłoczowski, et al. Poznań: W Drodze. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zalewski, Tomasz. 2020. “Definicja sztucznej inteligencji.” In Prawo sztucznej inteligencji, edited by Luigi Lai, and Marek Świerczyński. Warszawa: C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.