Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)

Articles

Unconstitutional Legislative Omission and the Status of the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2021.14.1-13  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2022-07-21

Abstract

The article deals with a legal problem such as a legal gap, in particular unconstitutional legislative omission. Georgian legislation does not recognize unconstitutional legislative omission, although examples of such shortcomings can be found here. This article focuses on the Article 7(3) of the Constitution of Georgia, which requires the adoption of a constitutional law on the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia, although this requirement has not been fulfilled for almost twenty years. The article shows the large vacuum related to the constitutional regulation of the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia, and negative consequences related to it. The article also reviews the approach of several countries to unconstitutional legislative omission and expresses an opinion on resolving this problem in the Georgian reality.

References

  1. Al–Dulaimi, Ahmed O. 2018. “From Negative to Positive Legislator? Response to Unconstitutional Legislative Omission as a Case Study in the Changing Roles of Constitutional Courts. Thesis (PhD Doctorate). Griffith University, Australia.” https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/381384 [accessed: 07.06.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brewer–Carías, Allan R. 2011. Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994760 [Google Scholar]
  3. Csink, Lóránt, József Petrétei, and Péter Tilk. 2011. “Constitutional Court as Positive Legislator.” In Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study, edited by Allan R. Brewer–Carías, 575–85. Hungary: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994760.024 [Google Scholar]
  4. De Sousa Ribero, Joaquim and Esperança Mealha. 2011. “Portugal. Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators.” In Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study, edited by Allan R. Brewer–Carias, 721–33. Hungary: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994760.031 [Google Scholar]
  5. Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1988. “Interpreting Legislative Inaction.” Michigan Law Review 87, no. 1:67–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1289147 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gegenava, Dimitry. 2017. “Idea-Fixes of Georgian Constitutionalism: When the «Wind of Change» Blows.” In Avtandil Demetrashvili 75, edited by Dimitry Gegenava, and Mariam Jikia, 106–24. Tbilisi: Prince Davit Institute for Law. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gegenava, Dimitry, and Paata Javakhishvili. 2018. “Constitutional Court of Georgia: Attempt and Challenges of Positive Legislation.” In Lado Chanturia 55. Anniversary Edition, edited by Dimitry Gegenava, 117–41. Tbilisi: Prince David Institute for Law. [Google Scholar]
  8. Goradze, George. 2018. “Devolution in the UK: Raised Powers of Scotland in Social-Economic and Tax-Financial Spheres.” In Lado Chanturia 55. Anniversary Edition, edited by Dimitry Gegenava, 101–16. Tbilisi: Prince David Institute for Law. [Google Scholar]
  9. Intskirveli, Givi. 2003. Theory of a State and Law. Tbilisi: Tbilisi University Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  10. Khubua, Giorgi. 2015. Theory of Law. Second completed and revised edition. Tbilisi: Meridiani Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mendes, Gilmar. 2008. “Constitutional Jurisdiction in Brazil: the Problem of Unconstitutional Legislative Omission.” http://www.stf.jus.br/repositorio/cms/portalStfInternacional/portalStfAgenda_pt_br/anexo/Jurisdicao_Constitucional_no_Brasil_Omissao_Legislativa_incostitucional1.pdf [accessed: 07.06.2021], 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nersesiantc, Vladik, ed. 2004. Problems of General Theory of Law and State. Moscow: Norma. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pócza, Kálmán, Gábor Dobos, and Attila Gyulai. 2019. “The Hungarian Constitutional Court: A Constructive Partner in Constitutional Dialogue.” In Constitutional Politics and the Judiciary. Decision-making in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Kálmán Pócza, 96–125. London–New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467097-5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Radziewicz, Piotr. 2019. “Constitutional Reviews of Incomplete Regulations in Poland.” Utrecht Law Review 15, no. 1:38–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.498 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schapiro, Robert A. 1989. “The Legislative Injunction: A Remedy for Unconstitutional Legislative Inaction.” Yale Law Journal 99, no. 1:231–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/796729 [Google Scholar]
  16. Urosa Maggi, Daniela. 2011. “Constitutional Courts as Positive legislators: The Venezuelan Experience.” In Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study, edited by Allan R. Brewer–Carias, 843–87. Hungary: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994760.037 [Google Scholar]
  17. Wacks, Raymond. 2006. Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192806918.001.0001 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.