Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 7 (2014)

Articles

Brief Sketch about Metaphor in Legal Discourse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.6261  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2014-12-31

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is not to present a concept of metaphor in legal discourse, which belongs to the theory and philosophy of law, but only to draw attention to the spread of metaphor in the legal language and the law and the need for more systematic approach to the analytical structure and function of the legal metaphor in the legal system understood as consisting of legal norms, judicial decisions and legal doctrine.

References

  1. I.C. Bartrum, Metaphors and Modalities: Meditations on Bobbitt's Theory of the Constitution William & Mary Bill, Rights Journal 2008, vol. 17. [Google Scholar]
  2. L.L. Berger, What is the sound of a corporation speaking? How the cognitive theory of metaphor can help lawyers shape the law, The Association of Legal Writing Directors 2004, vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Bielik-Ronson, Marks tańczący, w: M. Berman, Przygody z marksizmem, Warszawa 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Giuliani, La «nuova retorica» e la logica del linguaggio normativo, Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto 1970, No 47. [Google Scholar]
  5. B.J. Hibbitts, Making sense of metaphors: visuality, aurality, and the reconfiguration of american legal discourse, Cardozo Law Review 1994, vol. 16. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Johnson, G. Lakoff, Metafory w naszym życiu, Warszawa 2010. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Karwat, O statusie poznawczym i zaletach metafor, w: Metafory w polityce, B. Kaczmarek (red.), Warszawa 2003. [Google Scholar]
  8. T.T. Koncewicz, Aksjologia unijnego kodeksu proceduralnego, Rozdział XV Koncepcja „cienia proceduralnego. Warszawa 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. Z. Kovecses, Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling, Cambridge 2004. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Lakoff, The contemporary theory of metaphor, Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortony (ed.), Cambridge 1993. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Letsas, The ECHR as a living instrument: its meaning and legitimacy, w: Constituting Europe. The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, A. Føllesdal, B. Peters, G. Ulfstein, (eds), Cambridge 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Maliszewski, Metafora i aksjologia Wzorzec człowieka w renesansowej literaturze parenetycznej, Lublin 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Ricoeur, Metafora e ermeneutica, w: G. Conte (red.), Metafora, Milan 1981. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Ricoeur, The Rule of Metaphor. The Creation of Meaning in Language. London and New York 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Ricoeur, The Rule of Metaphor, London, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Ross, Metaphor and paradox, Georgia Law Review 1989, s. 1076–77 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  18. M.R. Smith, Levels of metaphor in persuasive legal writing, Mercer Law Review 2007, vol. 50. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Urry, Socjologia mobilności, Warszawa 2009. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.