Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 17 No. 19 (1) (2022)

Articles

Academic Employment Relationship. Discourse on Legal Branch-To-Branch Interactions

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/bsawp.4411  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2022-06-14

Abstract

“Academic” employment contract shows a number of distinctions from the “classical” employment contract regulated by the Labour Code. The provisions of the new Act – Law on Higher Education and Science constitute lex specialis in this respect. The specificity of the academic employment relationship manifests itself both in the sphere of employee relations, as well as tax relations (problems related to the manner and scope of application of increased (50%) tax deductible costs), or copyright law. Provision of work includes various activities of the employee. The provisions of the Law on higher education and science, which are located between the interplay of the above mentioned legal external relations, show a particular kind of dualism. They provide for a number of legal solutions of both restrictive and preferential nature (in institutional and employee dimension). The research objective that has been set is to analyse the specific features of the so-called “academic employment relationship” from the point of view of the institution (university), as well as the subject (academic teacher – creator). The above will make it possible to answer the question whether a sui generis legal relationship has been formed, or whether the growing, interdisciplinary interpretation problems are the result of incorrect interpretation or even shortcomings of legislative nature. In order to obtain verifiable research results, a dogmatic-legal and historical method has been used.

References

  1. Baran, Krzysztof. 2020. “Komentarz do wybranych przepisów ustawy – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce.” In Akademickie prawo zatrudnienia. Komentarz, edited by Krzysztof Baran. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  2. Goździewicz, Grzegorz, and Tadeusz Zieliński. 2017. “Komentarz do art. 22 Kodeksu pracy.” In Kodeks pracy. Komentarz, edited by Ludwik Florek. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jackowiak, Urszula. 2009. “Komentarz do art. 22 Kodeksu pracy.” In Urszula Jackowiak, Waldemar Uziak, and Alina Wypych-Żywicka, Prawo pracy. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jaśkowski, Kazimierz. 2021. “Komentarz do art. 22 Kodeksu pracy.” In Eliza Maniewska, and Kazimierz Jaśkowski, Komentarz aktualizowany do Kodeksu pracy. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuczyński, Tadeusz. 2020. “Komentarz do art. 117 ustawy – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce.” In Akademickie prawo zatrudnienia. Komentarz, edited by Krzysztof Baran. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ożegalska-Trybalska, Justyna. 2021. “Komentarz do ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych.” In Ustawy autorskie. Komentarze, vol. I, edited by Ryszard Markiewicz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pomorski, Piotr. 2019. “Podatek dochodowy od osób fizycznych.” In Prawo podatkowe, edited by Paweł Smoleń, and Wanda Wójtowicz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  8. Smoleń, Paweł, and Marzena Świstak. 2019. “Działalność twórcza pracownika badawczo-dydaktycznego. Aspekty prawnoautorskie i podatkowe.” In Prawo podatkowe w systemie prawa. Międzygałęziowe związki norm i instytucji prawnych, edited by Agnieszka Franczak, and Aneta Kaźmierczyk, 337-49. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tomaszewska, Monika. 2020. “Komentarz do art. 22 Kodeksu pracy.” In Kodeks pracy. Komentarz, Vol. I: Art. 1-113, edited by Krzysztof Baran. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zieliński, Jan M. 2019. “Komentarz do art. 112.” In Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Komentarz, edited by Hubert Izdebski. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. Lex el. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.