Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)


Research Developments on Legal Socialization

DOI:  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2022-07-21


The research approach to the issue of legal socialization changes along with the development of science and the evolution of legal theory. The paper reviews and systematizes the most important approaches and perspectives of research on legal socialization over time, from the first indepth studies up to 2020. It shows the research expansion of the last decade on a global scale, as well as its deficiency in Poland. By analyzing the factors of legal socialization, it is possible to reach a full understanding of the process, and to draw conclusions as to the future directions of research. Undoubtedly, there is a new perspective of research that takes into account the achievements of cognitive sciences, especially neuroscience.


  1. Blazi, Augusto. 1980. “Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature.” Psychological Bulletin 88:1–45. [Google Scholar]
  2. Borucka–Arctowa, Maria, and Grażyna Skąpska. 1993. “Teoretyczne podstawy socjalizacji prawnej.” In Socjalizacja prawna, edited by Maria Borucka–Arctowa, and Chantal Kourilsky, 11– 27. Warsaw: INP PAN. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradford, Ben, Aziz Huq, Jonathan Jackson, et al. 2014. “What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa.” Regulation & Governance 8 (2):246–68. https://doi. org/10.1111/rego.12012 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brożek, Bartosz, Łukasz Kurek, and Jerzy Stelmach, eds. 2018. Prawo i nauki kognitywne. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  5. Burdziel, Stanisław. 2016. “Legitymizacja władzy a sprawiedliwość proceduralna.” Studia Socjologiczne 4 (223):165–99. [Google Scholar]
  6. Buss, Emily. 2011. “Failing Juvenile Courts, and What Lawyers and Judges can Do About It.” Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy 6:317–33. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohn, Ellen S., Donald Bucolo, Cesar J. Rebellon, et al. 2010. “An integrated model of legal and moral reasoning and rule-violating behavior: The role of legal attitudes.” Law and Human Beha-vior 34 (4):295–309. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohn, Ellen S., and Kathryn L. Modecki. 2007. “Gender differences in predicting delinquent behavior: Do individual differences matter?” Social Behavior and Personality 35:359–74. https:// [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn, Ellen S., Rick Trinkner, Cesar J. Rebellon, et al. 2012. “Legal attitudes and legitimacy: Extending the integrated legal socialization model.” Victims & Offenders 7 (4):385–406. https:// [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohn, Ellen S., and Susan O. White. 1986. “Cognitive Development Versus Social Learning Approaches to Studying Legal Socialization.” Basic and Apllied Social Psychology 7 (3):195–209. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohn, Ellen S., and Susan O. White. 1990. Legal socialization. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  12. Corsaro, William A. 2011. The Socjology of Childhood. Los Angeles: Sage/Pine Forge Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fagan, Jefrey, and Tom R. Tyler. 2005. “Legal socialization of children and adolescents.” Social justice research 18 (3):217–41. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fagan, Jefrey, and Alex R. Piquero. 2007. “Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (4):715–48. [Google Scholar]
  15. Finckenauer, James O. 1995. Russian youth: Law, deviance, and the pursuit of freedom. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fine, Adam D., Caitlin Cavanagh, Sachiko Donley, et al. 2017. “Is the effect of justice system attitudes on recidivism stable after youths’ first arrest? Race and legal socialization among first-time youth offenders.” Law and human behavior 41 (2):146–58. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fine, Adam D., and Rick Trinkner. 2020. “Legal socialization.” In Routledge encyclopedia of psychology in the real world, edited by Regan Gurung. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. [accessed: 18.01.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  18. Giaro, Tomasz, ed. 2010. Skuteczność prawa. Warsaw: Liber. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grant, Heath B. 2006. Building a culture of lawfulness: Law enforcement, legal reasoning, and delinquency among Mexican youth. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  20. Grusec, Joan E., and Paul D. Hastings, eds. 2015. Handbook of socialization: Theory and research. 2nd edition. New York: The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. Teoria działania komunikacyjnego. Vol. 1. Translated by Andrzej M. Kaniowski. Warsaw: PWN. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hains, Anthony A., and Dolores J. Miller. 1980. “Moral and cognitive development in delinquent and nondelinquent children and adolescents.” The Journal of Genetic Psychology 137:21–35. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hogan, Robert, and Carol Mills. 1976. “Legal socialization.” Human Development 19 (5):261–76. [Google Scholar]
  24. Justice, Benjamin, and Tracey L. Meares. 2014. “How the criminal justice system educates citizens.” The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science 651:159–77. https:// [Google Scholar]
  25. Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1963/2008. “The development of children’s orientations toward a moral order.” Human Development 51:8–20. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kukołowicz, Paula. 2016. “Przymus zaakceptowany. Legitymizacja władzy policji w społeczeństwach post-komunistycznych.” Doctoral Dissertation. dle/item/1708/Kuko%C5%82owicz_Paula_Doktorat.pdf?sequence=1 [accessed: 18.01.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  27. Martin, Tracey A., and Ellen S. Cohn. 2004. “Attitudes toward the criminal legal system: Scale development and predictors. Psychology.” Crime & Law 10:367–91. 6831603100 01629 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mazerolle, Lorraine, Emma Antrobus, Stephanie M. Cardwell, et al. 2019. “Harmonizing Legal Socialization to Reduce Antisocial Behavior: Results from a Randomized Field Trial of Truanting Young People.” Justice Quarterly 38, no. 1:152–79. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mead, George H. 1975. Umysł, osobowość, społeczeństwo. Warsaw: PWN. [Google Scholar]
  30. Murphy, Kristina. 2015. “Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults’ and youths’ willingness to collaborate with police.” Policing and Society 25 (1):53–86. 1080/10439463.2013.802786 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ornacka, Katarzyna. 2013. Od socjologii do pracy społecznej. Społeczny fenomen dzieciństwa. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pardo, Michael S., and Denis Patterson. 2013. Minds, Brains and the Law. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pawlak, Anna. 2017. “Socjalizacja prawna – różne podejścia.” In Człowiek. Prawo. Państwo. Księga Jubileuszowa dedykowana Stanisławowi Leszkowi Stadniczeńko, edited by Jan Jeżewski, and Anna Pawlak, 773–82. Warsaw: Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Zarządzania w Warszawie. [Google Scholar]
  34. Petrosino, Anthony, Carolyn Turpin–Petrosino, and Sarah Guckenburg. 2010. “Formal System Processing of Juveniles: Effects on Delinquency.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 6:1–88. https:// [Google Scholar]
  35. Piaget, Jean. 1932. The Moral Judgment of the Child. London: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pieniążek, Antoni, and Małgorzata Stefaniuk. 2014. Socjologia prawa. Zarys wykładu. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  37. Piquero, Alex R., Jeffrey Fagan, Edward P. Mulvey, et al. 2005. “Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders.” The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 96 (1):267–98. [Google Scholar]
  38. Scott, Elizabeth, and Laurence Steinberg. 2018. “Adolescent Development and the Regulation of Youth Crime.” The Future of Children 18 (2):15–33. [Google Scholar]
  39. Selznick, Philip, Philippe Nonet, and Howard Vollmer. 1969. Law, Society and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  40. Stadniczeńko, Stanisław L., and Piotr Zamelski. 2016. Pedagogika prawa. Vade mecum! Pójdź ze mną! Warsaw: Wydawnictwo: VIZJA Press&It. [Google Scholar]
  41. Staśkiewicz, Wiesław. 2013. “Socjalizacja prawna.” In Leksykon socjologii prawa, edited by Anna Kociołek–Pęksy, and Mateusz Stępień, 325–32. Warsaw: C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sunshine, Jason, and Tom R. Tyler. 2003. “The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing.” Law & Society Review 37:513–48. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tapp, June L., and Felice J. Levine. 1974. “Legal socialization: Strategies for an ethical legality.” Stanford Law Review 27:1–72. [Google Scholar]
  44. Trinkner, Rick. 2012. “Testing the procedural justice model of legal socialization: Expanding beyond the legal world.” Doctoral Dissertation. [accessed: 10.01.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  45. Trinkner, Rick, and Ellen S. Cohn. 2014. “Putting the «social» back in legal socialization: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and cynicism in legal and nonlegal authorities.” Law and Human Behavior 38 (6):602–17. [Google Scholar]
  46. Trinkner, Rick, and Tom R. Tyler. 2016. “Legal Socialization: Coercion vs Consent in an era of Mistrust.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12:417–39. rev-lawsocsci-110615-085141 [Google Scholar]
  47. Trinkner, Rick, Jonathan Jackson, and Tom R. Tyler. 2018. “Bounded authority: Expanding «appropriate» police behavior beyond procedural justice.” Law and Human Behavior 42 (3):280–93. [Google Scholar]
  48. Trinkner, Rick, Herbert Rodrigues, Debora Piccirillo, et al. 2019. “Legal socialisation in Brazil: examining the generalisability of the procedural justice model.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  49. Turner, Jonathan, and Jan Stets. 2009. Socjologia emocji. Warsaw: PWN. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tyler, Tom R., Jefrey Fagan, and Amanda Geller. 2014. “Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11:751–85. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tyler, Tom R., and Rick Trinkner. 2018. Why children follow rules: Legal socialization and the development of legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 9780190644147.001.0001 [Google Scholar]


Download data is not yet available.