Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025)

Articles

Italian, European and International Constitutional Views Between the Parliamentary Imperative Mandate, Its Prohibition and the Phenomenon of ‘Transfughismo’

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.9796  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-12-29

Abstract

The age-old issue of the so-called “transfughismo” has sometimes particularly incisive consequences on the dynamics of democracy as well as on opposition-majority relations. “Transfughismo” is the defecting of parliamentarians, once elected in a certain parliamentary group, who then switch to another parliamentary group, usually in support of the Government. The impact of this so-called “change of uniform” undoubtedly concerns aspects of political nature, nevertheless the origin of the problem is purely constitutional. Most of the Charters, both in Europe and outside its borders, provide for the prohibition of the imperative mandate: they consider the parliamentarian to represent the entire nation. The comparative debate is leading constitutionalists and institutions to reflect on the reintroduction of the imperative mandate, that is the obligation of the deputy or senator to strictly comply with the indications of the Party or parliamentary group, under penalty of forfeiture of the positions they hold in the Parliament, including the role of parliamentarian tout court. The elected, with the introduction of the imperative mandate (as is already provided for in some Constitutions, i.e., the Portuguese one), does not represent the nation but the party that nominated him. This paper examines numerous European, American and Asian constitutions, scrutinizing their similarities and differences, thus reflecting on which path could be most consistent with the most recent law amendments, the material constitution’s change and the voters’ actual expectations. Particular attention will be given to the institutions of the Popular recall, the Abberufungsrecht, the Amtsenthebungsrecht and the Impeachment.

References

  1. Arce Jamariz, Alberto. 2004. El Parlamento en los tribunales, prontuario de jurisprudencia parlamentaria. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartolini, Francesco. 1997. Parliamentary representation and government activities. Naples: Scientific editorial. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bastida, Francisco J., Ramón Punset, and Ignacio de Otto. 1980. Lecciones de Derecho Constitucional. Órganos Constitucionales. Vol. I. Guiastur: Departamento de Derecho Político de la Universidadde Oviedo. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bobbio, Norberto. 1976. What Socialism? Discussion of an alternative. Turin: Einaudi. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonacci, Antonio. 1967. “Popular Sovereignty, Political Parties, and Parliament.” Direct democracy 1:194-97. [Google Scholar]
  6. Burke, Edmund. 1996. The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke. Vol. III. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Canotilho, Gomes J.J. 1987. Direito constitutional. Coimbra: Livraria universitária. [Google Scholar]
  8. Curreri, Salvatore. 2004. Democracy and political representation. From the prohibition of mandate to the mandate of the party. Vol. I. Florence: Firenze University press. [Google Scholar]
  9. De Esteban, Jorge. 1990. “El fenómeno español del transfuguismo político y la jurisprudencia constitucional.” Revista de Estudios Politicos 70:7-32. [Google Scholar]
  10. De Vidovich, Lorenzo. 2012-2013. Empty ballot boxes. Electoral abstention in Italy after the Second World War. Milan: University of Milan Bicocca. [Google Scholar]
  11. Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León, Luis. 1991. “Los ‘criterios de representación proporcional’ del artículo 68.3 de la Constitución su alcance y proyección a efectos distintos de la elección para el Congreso de los Diputados.” In Estudios sobre la Constitución Española en homenaje al profesor García de Enterría. Vol. III. Madrid: Editorial Civitas. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fracanzani, Marcello M. 2000. The problem of representation in the doctrine of the State. Padua: CEDAM. [Google Scholar]
  13. Giulimondi, Fabrizio. 2016. Material Constitution, Formal Constitution and Constitutional Reforms. Rome: Eurilink. [Google Scholar]
  14. Giulimondi, Fabrizio. 2020. “The constitutional relevance of parties in the era of ‘webcracy’ and ‘sondocracy’... Waiting for the referendum on the ‘cut of parliamentarians’.” Diritto 24, 5 March. [Google Scholar]
  15. Giupponi, Tommaso F. 2018. “The reform of the Senate’s Rules of Procedure and the troubled start of the XVIII legislature.” The State 10. [Google Scholar]
  16. Heidar, Knut, and Ruud Koole. 2000. Parliamentary party groups in European democracies: Political parties behind closed doors. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelsen, Hans. 1998. “Essence and Value of Democracy.” In Hans Kelsen, Democracy. Bologna: Il MuliNo. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mannino, Armando. 2001. “Parliamentary mobility between democratic principle, national representation and prohibition of mandate.” In Democracy, representation, responsibility, edited by Lorenza Carlassare. Padua: Cedam. [Google Scholar]
  19. Merlini, Stefano. 2004. Political representation, parliamentary groups, parties: the Italian context. Vol. II. Torino: Giappichelli. [Google Scholar]
  20. Miranda, Jorge. 1978. A constitução de 1976. Formaçao, estrutura, principios fundamentais. Lisboa: Livraria Petrony. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ornaghi, Lorenzo. 1998. “Atrophy of an idea. Brief notes on the ‘outdatedness’ of political representation today.” Journal of Constitutional Law 1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Petroni, Angelo M. 2000. “No to transformism, empty democracy.” Corriere della Sera, 7 January. [Google Scholar]
  23. Philipon, Edouard. 1882. Le mandat impératif. étude de droit constitutionnel comparé. Paris: Chevalier-Marescq. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ridola, Paolo. 1988. “Representation and Associationism.” In Representation and democracy, edited by Gianfranco Pasquino. Bari: Laterza. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ronchi, Paolo. 2009. “A Form of Direct Democracy: The Recall Experience in the United States of America.” Quaderni dell’Osservatorio Elettorale 61:1-43. [Google Scholar]
  27. Santoro, Sergio. 2003. “The internal democracy of the parties.” www.giustizia-amministrativa.it. [Google Scholar]
  28. Scarciglia, Roberto. 2005. The prohibition of mandatory mandate, contribution to a study of comparative law. Padua: CEDAM. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zanon, Nicolò. 2001. “Parliamentary defection: be careful in touching what remains of the free mandate.” Constitutional Notebooks 1:137-39. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.