Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019)

Articles

Legal Qualification of Sponsorship in Polish Law

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2019.12.2-10  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2019-12-31

Abstract

This study explores how the concept of sponsorship might be embodied within the.Polish legal order. In an economic and social environment, a sponsorship agreement might be seen as a new means of financing charitable works. It should be recognized that this type ofagreement is not currently recognized by Polish state law. A sponsorship agreement is distinct from a sponsoring agreement or a donation. There is no comparable institution in the Polish legal order. It is crucial for this study to determine how sponsorship can be adapted to conform with Polish civil law. Finally, it asks if the law of Poland could adopt the American solution to financing charity activity.

References

  1. Adamus, Rafał. 2006. “Istota sponsoring.” Rejent 1:35–51. [Google Scholar]
  2. Conlin, Daniel C. 2001. “Sponsorship at the Crossroads.” Health Progress 4:20–23. [Google Scholar]
  3. Grabowski, Mariusz. 2013. Sponsoring. Kwalifikacja prawna. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL. [Google Scholar]
  4. Huger, Bernard. C. 2001. “Canon Law Issues of Sponsorship, Governance Control and Alienation as they Relate to Catholic Church Entities in the United States: A Diocesan Attorney Perspective.” The Catholic Lawyer 1:19–26. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ignaczewski, Jacek. 2004. Umowy nienazwane. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaleta, Paweł, and Francis Morrisey. 2018. “Sponsorship of Catholic Health Care and Other Apostolic Works in the Church.” Studia Canonica 2:509–40. [Google Scholar]
  7. Katner, Wojciech. J., ed. 2010. System Prawa Prywatnego. Vol. 9: Prawo zobowiązań – umowy nienazwane. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kealy, Robert. 1999. “Canonical Aspects of Catholic Identity in the Institutional Setting.” Canon Law Society of America Proceedings 61:195–209. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mahony, Rob. 1999–2000. “Statement on Proposition 22, Same-Sex Marriage Initiative.” Origins 29:465–67. [Google Scholar]
  10. Morrisey, Francis. G. 1999. “Catholic Identity in a Challenging Environment.” Health Progress 6:38–42. [Google Scholar]
  11. Morrisey, Francis. G. 2001. “Toward Juridic Personality.” Health Progress 82:27–31. [Google Scholar]
  12. Morrisey, Francis. G. 2011. “New PJP Model «A Leap of Faith».” Health Progress 2:68–70. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nyrgen, David. J. 2001. “Effective Governance in Complex Systems.” Health Progress 4:41–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Radwański, Zygmunt, ed. 2008. System Prawa Prywatnego. Vol. 2: Prawo cywilne – część ogólna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  15. Roche, James. 2010. Working Together: A Core Document for Sponsorship and Governance in Catholic. Guelph, ON: Catholic Health Corporation of Ontario. [Google Scholar]
  16. Romanowski, Michał. 2009. “Czy należy regulować umowy nienazwane?” Studia Prawa Prywatnego 2:121–31. [Google Scholar]
  17. Stecki, Leopold. 2000. Sponsoring. Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stelmachowski, Andrzej. 1998. Zarys teorii prawa cywilnego. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sznajder, Andrzej. 2000. “Wprowadzenie do sponsoringu.” Brief 6:40–41. [Google Scholar]
  20. Thornber, John. 2009. “A Selected Bibliography on Sponsorship.” In Public Juridic Persons in the Church: Conference Presentations, ed. Maureen Cleary, 121–30. Sydney: Governance & Management Pty Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  21. Załucki, Mariusz, ed. 2019. Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.