Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018)

Articles

Protection of Cultural Identity – Internal Rules of the Employers and Their Anti-discrimination Aspects in the Decision Making Process of the Court of Justice of the EU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2018.11.2-30  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2018-12-31

Abstract

The article deals with the recent judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union that deal with the internal rules of the employers stipulating the neutrality principle of their employees. The neutrality principle prohibits the employee to wear any visible political, philosophical and religious symbols in the workplace. Such prohibition, may, however, be in conflict with the principle of non-discrimination within the meaning of the Directive 2000/78/EC. The article deals with the aspect the employers must take into account when they decide to issue internal rules requiring neutrality of their employees.

References

  1. Balážová, Daniela. 2017. “Do práce bez hidžábu aj kríža? Nie vždy.” Pravda. In https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/423261-do-prace-bez-hidzabu-aj-kriza-nie-vzdy/[accessed: 1.11.2018]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Križan, Viktor. 2013. “Sloboda presvedčenia a výhrada svedomia v pracovnom práve.” In Právna ochrana slobody svedomia, edited by Michaela Moravčíková, and Viktor Križan, 50–67. Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis, spoločné pracovisko Trnavskej univerzity v Trnave a Vedy, vydavateľstva Slovenskej akadémie vied. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moravčíková, Michaela. 2009. “Temptation in the desert. Troubles with state neutrality: or (not) talking about God: debate not only about the case of sister Dalmácia.” In Religion: problem or Promise?, edited by Šimon Marinčák, 153–158. Trnava: Dobrá kniha. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moravčíková, Michaela. 2014. “Náboženská neutralita štátu a svet práce.” In Sloboda jednotlivca a svet práce, edited by Michaela Moravčíková, and Viktor Križan, 183–191. Praha: Leges. [Google Scholar]
  5. Moravčíková, Michaela. 2014. “Sekulárny štát a náboženská sloboda v sociológii a v právnej teórii.” In Constans et perpetua voluntas, edited by Peter Mach, Matej Pekarik, and Vojtech Vladár, 435–450. Trnava: Trnavská univerzita v Trnave. [Google Scholar]
  6. Moravčíková, Michaela. 2014. “The mutual roles of religion and state in Slovakia.” In The mutual roles of religion and state in Europe, edited by Balazs Schanda, 177–191. Trier: European consortium for Church and state research. [Google Scholar]
  7. Moravčíková, Michaela. 2015. “Religion, law, and secular principles in the Slovak Republic.” In Religion and the secular state, edited by Javier Martínez–Torrón, and Cole Durham, 641–655. Madrid: Universidad Complutense. [Google Scholar]
  8. Moravčíková, Michaela. 2015. “Sloboda myslenia, svedomia a náboženského vyznania.” In Verejná správa, edited by Soňa Košičiarová [et al.], 146–150. Krakov: Spolok Slovákov v Poľsku. [Google Scholar]
  9. Moravčíková, Michaela. 2016. “Law and religion in the workplace in the Slovak Republic.” In Law and religion in the workplace, edited by Miguel Rodriguez Blanco, 337–348. Granada: Comares. [Google Scholar]
  10. Moravčíková, Michaela. 2016. “Nekotorye aspekty gosudarstvenno-cerkovnych otnošenij v stranach Evropejskovo Sojuza.” In Novaja Evropa – obšestvo, kultura, riligija i pravo, edited by Michaela Moravčíková, 68–79. Bratislava: Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  11. Olšovská, Andrea. 2017. “«Dress code» zamestnanca a náboženské vyznanie.” In Islam v Európe – právne postavenie a financovanie islamských náboženských organizácií, edited by Michaela Moravčíková, 43–61. Praha: Leges. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.