Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie

Tom 12 Nr 2 (2019)

Artykuły

Negocjacje zbiorowe jako forma zaangażowania związków zawodowych w regulację warunków zatrudnienia na platformach internetowych

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2019.12.2-19  [Google Scholar]
Opublikowane: 31.12.2019

Abstrakt

Artykuł podejmuje problematykę zaangażowania związków zawodowych w kwestie zatrudnienia na platformach internetowych. W pierwszej części poruszono zagadnienia ogólne związane ze zbiorowym prawem pracy i zatrudnieniem na platformie. W dalszej części podjęto analizie poszczególne formy zaangażowania związków zawodowych. W artykule zawarto główną hipotezę, że kluczowym warunkiem regulacji sprawiedliwej i godnej pracy na globalnych platformach internetowych jest aktywizacja związków zawodowych w postaci podejmowania działań informacyjnych i podejmowanie dialogu społecznego w postaci rokowań zbiorowych.

Bibliografia

  1. Aneesh, Aneesh. 2009. “Global Labor: Algocratic Modes of Organization.” Sociological Theory 27 (4): 347–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01352.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Arntz, Melan, Terry Gregory, and Zierahn Ulrich. 2016. “How Many Jobs Could Be Replaced?” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 2:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en [Google Scholar]
  3. Avogaro, Matteo. 2017. “Right To Disconnect: French and Italian Proposals for a Global Issue.” Presentation during 5th Conference of the Regulating for Decent Work Network. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg, Janine Marie, Marianne Furrer, Ellie Harmon, Uma Rani, and M. Six Silberman. 2018. Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. International Labour Office. Geneva: International Labour Office. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bughin, Jacques, James Manyika, Jonathan Woetzel, Frank Michael Mattern, Susan Chui, Anu Lund, Sree Madgavkar, et al. 2017. “A Future That Works: Automation, Employment, and Productivity.” http://njit2.mrooms.net/pluginfile.php/688844/mod_resource/content/1/Executive Summary of McKinsey Report on Automation.pdf [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Caroll, John M. 1992. “Human Computer Interaction.” https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/human-computer--interaction-brief-intro [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  7. Change, Jae–Hee, and Phu Huynh. 2016. ASEAN in Transformation. The Future of Jobs at Risk of Automation. Bureau for Employers’ Activities, Working Paper No 9. Bangkok: International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cherry, Miriam. 2016. “Beyond Misclassification: The Digital Transformation of Work.” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 37 (3): 544–77. [Google Scholar]
  9. Danaher, John. 2016. “The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.” Philosophy and Technology 29 (3): 245–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Stefano, Valerio. 2018a. “Negotiating the Algorithmm: Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Labour Protection.” SSRN Electronic Journal, no. 254. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178233 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Stefano, Valerio. 2018b. “Negotiating the Algorithmm: Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Labour Protection.” SSRN Electronic Journal, no. 246. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178233 [Google Scholar]
  12. Finkin, Matthew W. 2016. “Beclouded Work, Beclouded Workers in Historical Perspective.” Journal of Law and Society Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37 (3): 20. [Google Scholar]
  13. Frey, Carl Benedikt, and Michael A. Osborne. 2017. “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114 (January). Elsevier Inc.: 254–80. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gibson, Megan. 2014. “Here’s a Radical Way to End Vacation Email Overload.” https://time.com/3116424/daimler-vacation-email-out-of-office/ [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hale, Julian. 2018. “In Denmark, a Historic Collective Agreement Is Turning the «Bogus Self--Employed» into «Workers with Rights».” https://www.equaltimes.org/in-denmark-a-historic-collective?lang=en#.XZ9PsWYwhPb [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  16. Howe, Jeff. 2006. “The Rise of Crowdsourcing.” Wired Magazine 14 (06): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1086/599595 [Google Scholar]
  17. Howe, Jeff. 2009. Crowdsourcing : Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Three Rivers Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, Nancy. 2014. “The Wrap Contract Morass.” Southwestern University Law Review 44 (2): 309–25. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, Min Kyung, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. “Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers.” https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mklee/materials/Publication/2015-CHI_algorithmic_management.pdf [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lessig, Lawrence. 2000. “Code Is Law. On Liberty in Cyberspace.” https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Hongwei, Bin Yu, and Dengyong Zhou. 2013. “Error Rate Bounds in Crowdsourcing Models.” http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2674 [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ludicone, Feliciano. 2017. “Italy: New Rules to Protect Self-Employed Workers and Regulate ICT-Based Mobile Work.” https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/it/publications/article/2017/italy-new-rules-to-protect-self-employed-workers-and-regulate-ict-based-mobile-work [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pieter de Groen, Willem, Zachary Kilhoffer, Karolien Lenaerts, and Irene Mandl. 2018. “Employment and Working Conditions of Selected Types of Platform Work.” https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2018/employment-and-working-conditions-of--selected-types-of-platform-work [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  24. Prassl, Jeremias. 2018a. “Collective Voice in the Platform Economy: Challenges, Opportunities, Solutions.” Report to the ETUC. https://www.etuc.org/sites/default/files/publication/file/2018-09/Prassl%20report%20maquette.pdf [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]
  25. Prassl, Jeremias. 2018b. Humans as a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Schubert, Claudia, and Marc-Thorsten Hütt. 2019. “Economy-on-Demand and the Fairness of Algorithms.” European Labour Law Journal 10 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519829082 [Google Scholar]
  27. The World Bank. 2016. “World Development Report, 2016: Digital Dividends.” Choice Reviews Online 53 (11): 53‒4889‒53–4889. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.196952 [Google Scholar]
  28. Voss, Eckhard and Hannah Riede. 2018. Cyfryzacja a pratycypacja praowików: jakie są opinie związków zawodowych, pracowników na poziomie przedsiębiorstwa i pracowników wykonujących pracę za pośrednictwem platform cyfrowych w Europie. Raport dla ETUC. https://www.etuc.org/sites/default/files/publication/file/2018-09/Voss%20Report%20PL1.pdf [accessed: 10.10.2019]. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.