Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Nr 1/77 (2022)

Artykuły

The possibilities of using social media in selling insurance in the agricultural segment

  • Tomasz Czuba
Opublikowane: 28.06.2022

Abstrakt

Marketing communication on the market in the 21st century is dominated by social media. We can’t imagine functioning in the real world without being constantly present in them. The potential of social media is more and more often recognized by companies, which reach their audience faster with their message in precisely such a manner.
The classic model of marketing communication described, for example, by P. Kotler is still up-to-date. However, it takes on a different character, because the speed of the transmission has an impact on immediate feedback. Therefore, social media constitute a challenge for companies selling their standardized products and services on the market. On the one hand, the message reaches current and potential recipients, on the other hand, we immediately receive feedback sent consciously in response to the message. If the answer is missing, we can – taking advantage of social media – find out what the recipient did with “our” message.
Speaking about social media, we usually don’t go into details, treating the audience almost uniformly (the distance barrier does not exist). From a different point of view, it seems that it is the consumers – local and large-scale recipients – that constitute the base of such activities. Perhaps this is true, as can be proven by effective campaigns and the financial results of companies representing different sectors. However, it seems that omitting other recipients is a mistake. According to the authors, insurers offering their products in the agricultural segment do not fully benefit from the potential of social media.
The article aims to indicate unused possibilities of social media concerning the sale of insurance products in the agricultural segment. To achieve the goal, the authors will explain the essence of social media and how important are social media relations. They will take advantage of their own research carried out in this segment in 2020. In addition to describing insurance, these studies also addressed the use of social media (the extent of using them by farmers).

Bibliografia

  1. Badowski K., Posdorf D., Wiewiórkowski Ł., Wartości: klucz do silnych marek na rynkach rozwiniętych, “Harvard Business Review Polska” 2009, Vol. 71, No. 1. [Google Scholar]
  2. CBOS, Opinie na temat funkcjonowania systemu opieki zdrowotnej, “Komunikat z badań” 2021, nr 125, https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2021/K_125_21.PDF, access 16.06.2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dorenda-Zaborowicz M., Marketing w social media, “Nowe media” 2012, nr 3. [Google Scholar]
  4. Doyle P., Marketing wartości, Warsaw 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D.W., Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model, “MIS Quarterly” 2003, Vol. 27, No. 1. [Google Scholar]
  6. Grębosz M., Siuda D., Szymański G., Social Media Marketing, Monografie Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Grębosz M, E-konsument a portale społecznościowe, “Handel Wewnętrzny” 2011, t. 3. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaplan A.M., Haenlein M., Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media, “Business Horizons” 2010, Vol. 53, No.1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaznowski D, Social media – społeczny wymiar Internetu, E-marketing. Współczesne trendy. Pakiet startowy, Warsaw, PWN, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kotler Ph., Keller K.L., Marketing, Poznań, Dom Wydawniczy REBIS, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Laroche M., Habibi M.R., Richard M. et al., The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty, “Computers in Human Behavior” 2012, Vol. 28, No. 5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Laroche M., Habibi M.R., Richard M., To be or not to be in social media: How brand loyalty is affected by social media?, “International Journal of Information Management” 2013, Vol. 33, No. 1. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mazurek G., Promocja w Internecie – narzędzie, zarządzanie, praktyka, Gdańsk, Ośrodek Doradztwa i Doskonalenia Kadr, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mazurek G., Znaczenie wirtualizacji marketingu w sieciowym kreowaniu wartości, Warsaw, Poltext, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  15. Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń, Private health insurance is already possessed by nearly 3.7 million Poles – results after Q3. 2021, https://piu.org.pl/prywatne-ubezpieczenie-zdrowotne-ma-juz-blisko-37-mln-polakow-wyniki-po-iii-kw-2021-r/, access 16.06.2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. Raacke J., Bonds-Raacke J., MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites, “Cyber Psychology and Behavior” 2008, Vol. 11, No. 2. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rak A., Kreowanie wizerunku marki w mediach społecznościowych, “Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu” 2012, Vol. 260. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rheingold H., The virtual community. Homesteading on the electronic frontier, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA 1993. [Google Scholar]
  19. Seda C., Sprzedaż online, Gliwice, Helion, 2008. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.